<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Peak Performance from the 2011 Ford Mustang V6</title> <atom:link href="http://www.stangnet.com/2010/03/04/peak-performance-from-the-2011-ford-mustang-v6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.stangnet.com/2010/03/04/peak-performance-from-the-2011-ford-mustang-v6/</link> <description>Ford Mustang Blog and Forums, including 2011 and 2010 Mustang reviews, photos and forums.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Bud</title><link>http://www.stangnet.com/2010/03/04/peak-performance-from-the-2011-ford-mustang-v6/#comment-10142</link> <dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:04:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stangnet.com/?p=2194#comment-10142</guid> <description>Just bought a 2011 v6 manual trans. I think they have under estimated the car! Way more fun to drive than my 08 4.0 ltr. 5 speed. I am real impressed with throttle response, especially after looking underneath and seeing 2.76 tail gears. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just bought a 2011 v6 manual trans. I think they have under estimated the car! Way more fun to drive than my 08 4.0 ltr. 5 speed. I am real impressed with throttle response, especially after looking underneath and seeing 2.76 tail gears.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Al</title><link>http://www.stangnet.com/2010/03/04/peak-performance-from-the-2011-ford-mustang-v6/#comment-6314</link> <dc:creator>Al</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:24:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stangnet.com/?p=2194#comment-6314</guid> <description>this is great. so hard to buy a new mustang these days because they get better and better each yr.89 LX 5.0 Hatch</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is great. so hard to buy a new mustang these days because they get better and better each yr.</p><p>89 LX 5.0 Hatch</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh</title><link>http://www.stangnet.com/2010/03/04/peak-performance-from-the-2011-ford-mustang-v6/#comment-5724</link> <dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:39:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stangnet.com/?p=2194#comment-5724</guid> <description>Had a 95 5.o auto and swaped everything over to amsoil. Over a 200 mile shot with combined city town driving and highway with speed at 70 was 28 mpg..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a 95 5.o auto and swaped everything over to amsoil. Over a 200 mile shot with combined city town driving and highway with speed at 70 was 28 mpg..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.stangnet.com/2010/03/04/peak-performance-from-the-2011-ford-mustang-v6/#comment-5696</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:53:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stangnet.com/?p=2194#comment-5696</guid> <description>No Joke!  My old 1990 Mustang 5.0 LX with a five speed has had a best of 32mpg.  And it still gets almost that on the highway with almost 150,000 miles.  Gotta Love those Stangs!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Joke!  My old 1990 Mustang 5.0 LX with a five speed has had a best of 32mpg.  And it still gets almost that on the highway with almost 150,000 miles.  Gotta Love those Stangs!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob white</title><link>http://www.stangnet.com/2010/03/04/peak-performance-from-the-2011-ford-mustang-v6/#comment-5658</link> <dc:creator>Bob white</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:36:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stangnet.com/?p=2194#comment-5658</guid> <description>recently i took a road trip in my 07 sgt from ny to texas and back again . i averaged 26.5 mph with a high of 32.5 and a low of 23.3 ,and the low was running at 150. i had to pay a 1000.00 gas guzzler tax on the car what gives ? the v8 is no gas eater itself if treated right.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>recently i took a road trip in my 07 sgt from ny to texas and back again . i averaged 26.5 mph with a high of 32.5 and a low of 23.3 ,and the low was running at 150. i had to pay a 1000.00 gas guzzler tax on the car what gives ? the v8 is no gas eater itself if treated right.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Database Caching 26/30 queries in 0.002 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 352/356 objects using xcache

Served from: www.stangnet.com @ 2012-02-12 23:26:24 -->
