Mustang Forums at StangNet

I just installed Mach 1 springs

This is a discussion on I just installed Mach 1 springs within the 4.6 Tech forums, part of the 4.6L Mustang category; I did it during the weekend, I got the springs from a guy that took them off from his Mach ...

Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > 4.6L Mustang > 4.6 Tech

Over 151,000 Members!!

Register Vendors Garage FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-03, 11:40 AM
vrpirata's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: July 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 274
I just installed Mach 1 springs

I did it during the weekend, I got the springs from a guy that took them off from his Mach 1, side by side they are actually shorter than the factory GT ones, before I did it I check how low the car was and I wrote down the numbers in a piece of paper, then after the change I measure it again and my surprice was that the drop was basically zero

When I was doing the spring change I was also going to install the Tokico struts/shocks from the Mach 1 (yes they have the tokico label on them), but when I took the GT ones off I notice that they were as hard to compress as the tokico from the Mach 1, so I decided to reinstall the stock struts/shocks, at least this way I'll have the tokico ready when the stock ones goes bad.

So what is the parameter that tells the difference between struts/shocks, I know the stock struts are "32 mm piston, valve shocks" and the rear are "30 mm piston", versus the tokico "35 mm piston" for the front and "30 mm piston" for the rear, is that a good parameter for comparison?, does it means that the stock ones perform similar than the tokico?, I believe the tokico are should be better quality anyways.

For the rear swaybar, the tickness is the same between the GT swaybar and the Mach 1, however few websites claim that the rear GT swaybar is tubular and the Mach 1 is solid, I went to check to the Ford dealer and the computer showed the same swaybars for both GT and Mach 1 , so I'm keeping the one I already have I guess.

Last edited by vrpirata; 11-03-03 at 11:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-03, 12:06 PM
mrvax's Avatar
Stay thirsty my friends
 
Join Date: December 2001
Location: SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Posts: 5,888
We learn something new each day.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-03, 12:47 PM
blkgt714's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA/Orange County
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrvax
We learn something new each day.
Damn, your post is an overview on how Stangnet has become.. Even the mods are sarcastic and won't miss a chance to try to make someone look like an idiot.. Save it.

I don't care what anyone says.. The Mach does not have a noticeable lowered stance, especially the front. Just as high as my 02 GT was pre steeda springs. I think the back sits slightly lower. Ford should have lowered it to at least bullitt levels, but probably were afraid of too many scuffs on that all so important piece of plastic on the bottom of the bumper...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-03, 12:50 PM
ttown's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 819
Here a head to head comparison of the Mach/GT/Bullett. Go to the bottom of the page and you'll see all the differences........


http://www.mach1registry.com/Specs/Specs.htm
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-03, 12:54 PM
Official Member
 
Join Date: June 2003
Posts: 348
I don't think the mach 1 springs drop is much more than 3/4" compared to gt's. I put the eibach pro kit springs on my gt and I've had my car sitting next to the mach 1 and my stance is noticeably lower. I did have to replace my stock shocks. They weren't valved right for the new springs. I went with mach 1 tokicos and I am very happy with the results.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-13-03, 10:00 PM
351CJ's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: December 2002
Posts: 1,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttown
Here a head to head comparison of the Mach/GT/Bullett. Go to the bottom of the page and you'll see all the differences........


http://www.mach1registry.com/Specs/Specs.htm
There are some errors in that chart.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-13-03, 10:26 PM
Wills Black 98's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: December 2002
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 2,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by blkgt714
Damn, your post is an overview on how Stangnet has become.. Even the mods are sarcastic and won't miss a chance to try to make someone look like an idiot.. Save it.
how can you detect sarcasm on the internet through someones typing? you cant... He wasent be sarcastic at all... just my .02
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 PM.