 | | 
11-30-03, 09:59 PM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: March 1999 Location: Indianapolis, IN USA
Posts: 486
| | | 99 Cobra VS 2001 Cobra Ok...I've somewhat narrowed my choice down to two cars...that I am considering trading my 99 GT in for. One is a white 99 Cobra with 29K miles for $17K, and the other is a silver 2001 Cobra with 19K for $20900. I've driven the white cobra, and it is very nice. I haven't driven the 2001...since it IS out of town...but the pics of the car are very nice. Besides the front headlight tint, the polishing of the wheels, the interior and the rear fascia 'Cobra' stamp, what...if any...other differences are there between the two cars? The 99 sat at the dealer for over a year...but it is in excellent shape. Are the 99 Cobras hard to sell because of the recall situation? I hate it that the 99 Cobras don't have the word COBRA stamped on the rear fascia, but I can get over that. The main thing is: I don't want to have a problem selling the car...when the time comes. | 
12-01-03, 12:30 AM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: April 2003 Location: Portage, IN
Posts: 130
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Kane Ok...I've somewhat narrowed my choice down to two cars...that I am considering trading my 99 GT in for. One is a white 99 Cobra with 29K miles for $17K, and the other is a silver 2001 Cobra with 19K for $20900. I've driven the white cobra, and it is very nice. I haven't driven the 2001...since it IS out of town...but the pics of the car are very nice. Besides the front headlight tint, the polishing of the wheels, the interior and the rear fascia 'Cobra' stamp, what...if any...other differences are there between the two cars? The 99 sat at the dealer for over a year...but it is in excellent shape. Are the 99 Cobras hard to sell because of the recall situation? I hate it that the 99 Cobras don't have the word COBRA stamped on the rear fascia, but I can get over that. The main thing is: I don't want to have a problem selling the car...when the time comes. |
Either car is nice, but I would get the 01! Just simply for the fact that you don't have to worry if the car had the recall performed on it! And you get the Cobra rear bumper like you want and the polished wheels! Go with the 01 and don't look back!!  | 
12-01-03, 01:38 AM
|  | Banned | | Join Date: November 2002 Location: GA
Posts: 961
| | Get the 01  | 
12-01-03, 04:36 AM
| | Founding Member | | Join Date: January 2002 Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 257
| | I just bought a silver 2001 for 20,100 with 23k miles on it....so your prices are good.
I would go with the 01...couple years newer, typically known as a better year for the cobra...even if they are equal.
I like mine just need to learn to drive better. Its my first stick car  | 
12-01-03, 09:53 AM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: September 2001 Location: SoCal
Posts: 888
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Morpheusgpr I just bought a silver 2001 for 20,100 with 23k miles on it....so your prices are good.
I would go with the 01...couple years newer, typically known as a better year for the cobra...even if they are equal.
I like mine just need to learn to drive better. Its my first stick car  | Wow! What a first stick car!
Get the '01!  | 
12-01-03, 10:00 AM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: November 2001
Posts: 532
| | Like you've already mentioned, the differences are minor and the power levels should be nearly the same if the car has had the fix. I would advice you to at least try the seats in the 2001 before you decide, since they are generally considered more comfortable. The only other thing I can think of is with the 01 you get the 6 CD in-dash changer as opposed to a single player.
Either way, I doubt you'll be disappointed.
Last edited by Traveler; 12-01-03 at 10:03 AM.
| 
12-01-03, 11:12 AM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: September 2001 Location: Austin
Posts: 1,566
| | Both are great cars. Go with the best financial deal and condition of the car. And which one you like the best. You got to drive it and like it that is very important.
I like the option of the 99 (cheaper) since that gives you about 4K for MODS!!!!!!!
John | 
12-01-03, 11:33 AM
|  | Official Member | | Join Date: June 2003 Location: Hudson Valley
Posts: 1,575
| | I traded my 97GT in for an 01 Cobra back in April (2k miles for 24k) and i havn't looked back i love it. my 01 was also my first stick car. I love the seats BTW
I did drive my dads cars and trucks all of which were a stick so it wasn't like i learned on my Cobra. my previous cars were a 91 Olds cutlass, 94Tbird, 97GT and then my Cobra.
My wife hates stick cars but once i talked her into letting me get a Cobra life has been all down hill and she won't drive the Cobra just because of the stick, and thats fine with me she has a Brand new Jetta 1.8T Tiptronic. | 
12-01-03, 12:10 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Clinton Twp, MI
Posts: 643
| | Both are great cars....although the 99's got more bad press because of the little issue. Still, I would go with the 01. Better seats, radio, a "Cobra" rear bumper, smoked headlights, and polished wheels.
If you were to buy these mods for the 99 Cobra to get it up to par, it would cost you at LEAST $2,000....
EDIT: Oh, they also have 31 spline axles instead of 28 spline. So add another $800 to get the 99 Cobra up to 01 specs.
As for transmissions...the 99's came with the T45 and the 01's got the T3650. Both have their own "weaknesses" so it's kind of a wash in my opinion.
Last edited by 99SVTAddict; 12-01-03 at 12:13 PM.
| 
12-01-03, 02:43 PM
|  | GoldMember | | Join Date: April 2000 Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,097
| | Either one will work!
Ensure that you check them both real good.
Naz | 
12-03-03, 01:28 AM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: March 2001 Location: Citrus Springs, FL
Posts: 1,023
| | I say go with the '01, just because you'd be happy with the stuff you said you didnt like missing on the '99 | 
12-03-03, 01:59 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: December 2002 Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 245
| | Other than the axles, everything is cosmetic. If you want to go aftermarket with the radio, the '99 is way easier. The big double din box of the '01 is a pain. Very few adapters and aftermarket stuff that is decent without modifications. You will need a schematic to get the Mach 460 hooked up right with the non-factory stuff to work properly. There is plenty of aftermarket stuff to plug right into the '99 with no issues.
As for the seats, you can go out and get Sparco or Recaro for a good price.
No Cobra on the bumper? Big deal. In my own opinion, I would rather see no letters at all as it looks cleaner. Every time I see those highlighted letters, it reminds me of those Cutlass SX's with the big letters across the bumper.
Smoked headlights? It depends on the color of the car. Vibrant colors, like Rio Red, look better with the clears. If you buy the '99 and want smoked, go to a junk yard and take them off a late model 'Stang.
Looking at it from my perspective, I would get the '01. Ten K less miles, two years younger, depending on the build date, and it probably has some factory warranty left. I like the '99s myself due to the fact that I drove one (Rio Red 'vert #3684. I wish I had it back.) until I got my '03. Dollar for dollar, though, the '01 is a better buy unless you intend to do a lot of mods right away.
Good luck!  | 
12-04-03, 04:44 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: August 2003 Location: Maryland
Posts: 102
| | I love my 01, I looked at some 99's and wasn't impressed. I don't like the spoiler, rear bumper, interior, etc. the list goes on and on. | 
12-06-03, 08:48 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: October 2003
Posts: 26
| | My 99 smokes 01
i have just about every bolt on beside headers
Ime not sure what was in his car but i had stock rims n he had 18 inch cobra rs | 
12-06-03, 10:26 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: December 2002 Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 245
| | Just one question, SVT Chic, how does the list go on and on? The only true differences between the two is the seats. The rest is cosmetic and/or basically inconsequential. 3650 or T45? You wouldn't know the difference unless you were told. 31 spline to 28 spline axles? You may want the beefier axles if you are really going to crank up the power, otherwise, who cares? The radio? The '99s is much better with way more aftermarket stuff available. There is no difference mechanically in the cars. The same motor with the same power.
I am sure that you like your '01, but there is no difference in driveablity. The seats are the '01s only advantage. You can get aftermarket seats that are truely fine for a good price. If it wasn't for the smoked headlights, you couldn't tell the difference until you get close.  | 
12-07-03, 12:13 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: August 2003 Location: Maryland
Posts: 102
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by CobraCruiser Just one question, SVT Chic, how does the list go on and on? The only true differences between the two is the seats. The rest is cosmetic and/or basically inconsequential. 3650 or T45? You wouldn't know the difference unless you were told. 31 spline to 28 spline axles? You may want the beefier axles if you are really going to crank up the power, otherwise, who cares? The radio? The '99s is much better with way more aftermarket stuff available. There is no difference mechanically in the cars. The same motor with the same power.
I am sure that you like your '01, but there is no difference in driveablity. The seats are the '01s only advantage. You can get aftermarket seats that are truely fine for a good price. If it wasn't for the smoked headlights, you couldn't tell the difference until you get close.  | The 99 did not have as much power as the 01 by far, I've seen both cars dynoed with a stock set up and the 99 had nothing compared to what they advertised. This is a known fact not an assumption.
Would you like me to research this more  | 
12-07-03, 12:46 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: September 2001 Location: HOCKEYTOWN ® , MI
Posts: 6,311
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by SVT Chic The 99 did not have as much power as the 01 by far, I've seen both cars dynoed with a stock set up and the 99 had nothing compared to what they advertised. This is a known fact not an assumption.
Would you like me to research this more  |
SVT Chic,
I think CobraCruiser was talking about a "fixed" 1999 Vs a 2001. In other words:
A stock (read: "fixed") '99 will dyno similar to an '01 (stock trim), with all other factors being equal.
Just ask anyone on the BON Cobra board..
Ok, and now my opinion on the matter (because Kane wanted our input):
I think both the '99 and the '01 are great snakes. Of course, each one comes with its own nuances and specific features (which have already been mentioned), but for the most part, they are very similar vehicles.
The '01s will typically hold a higher resale value than the '99s simply because they are newer - that is the bottom line IMHO. Look into nada.com or kbb.com and it's easy to see that the biggest price factor is "model year."
Most people (once educated about "the fix") are able to look past the "horsepower recall" that the 1999 cobras suffered from. If I was deciding between a '99 and an '01 I would choose the one that met my goals (i.e. Will this be a daily driver or perhaps one geared more towards racing?).
Example: Let's say you have a " $23K" (this is a made up number!) budget.
You purchase (which we will say costs significantly less when compared to an '01; giving you a few thousand leftover to play with) and you then put that extra money into a plethora of bolt-on modifications. In other words, your car is now a force to be reckoned with at the track. Got it? 
Ok good. OR you can choose a second scenario. You purchase an '01 for roughly $23K (your entire budget). You drive the car and enjoy it (ideal for those who have very little interest in modding their cobras).
And, finally: To everybody
/moderator hat "on"
Let's continue to keep this thread civil while engaging in friendly discussion and debate about these vehicles we all love. Thanks. 
Last edited by COBRA90GT; 12-07-03 at 12:50 PM.
| 
12-07-03, 02:10 PM
|  | GoldMember | | Join Date: April 2000 Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,097
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by SVT Chic The 99 did not have as much power as the 01 by far, I've seen both cars dynoed with a stock set up and the 99 had nothing compared to what they advertised. This is a known fact not an assumption.
Would you like me to research this more  | Ok,
Here goes again the 99 vs 01 debate
Yeah, why dont you researche it. Here is a quick dyno sheet of my 99 after the fix with no mods other than a K&N.
It has been posted 100 times, so one more will not hurt.
How many 01 stock have you seen with 290+RWHP?
They are the same cars....quit it.
Naz | 
12-07-03, 04:20 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: August 2003 Location: Maryland
Posts: 102
| | Your dyno sheet has totally swayed everything I said! riiiight | 
12-07-03, 05:12 PM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: June 2002 Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 1,357
| | If it were me, I'd get the '01. You'll have more of a warranty with it, less miles, better comfort and looks in my opinion. I recently traded my GT in for my snake and got a 6 year/70,000 mile warranty with it. Not bad for a '01 with 9700 miles for $22K. Keep shopping around. There are alot of '01 Cobras popping up here of late. People are trading them in for the '03+ snakes. | 
12-07-03, 06:42 PM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: December 2000 Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 598
| | Only two big differences, really. The 01 has 31 spline axles (as opposed to 28) and the TR3650 tranny (versus the T-45). The 31 splines are better, obviously, but the T-45 will last longer than a 3650 racing. And, for the record, there are obvious differences in the feel of a shift between the two trannies. | 
12-08-03, 05:08 PM
| | Founding Member | | Join Date: December 2001 Location: Michigan
Posts: 453
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Nazman Ok,
Here goes again the 99 vs 01 debate
Yeah, why dont you researche it. Here is a quick dyno sheet of my 99 after the fix with no mods other than a K&N.
It has been posted 100 times, so one more will not hurt.
How many 01 stock have you seen with 290+RWHP?
They are the same cars....quit it.
Naz |
Naz is correct.
OT: Naz, but your snake is a bit of a factory freak IMHO...  | 
12-08-03, 06:37 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: March 2002
Posts: 44
| | TECHNICAL
Shifting Evolution
TTC-Tremec’s new TR3650 5-speed combines the shift-ability of the production T45 with the durability of the legendary TR3550
By Donald Farr
When the Bullitt Mustang hit the streets in 2001, there's no arguing that the car had all the right elements for a specialty Mustang – more horsepower, muscular looks, and a lot of neat trim to differentiate it from the regular Mustang GTs. Less obvious, and just barely mentioned in Ford press release literature, is the fact that the Bullitt models were the first Mustangs equipped with TTC-Tremec’s new TR3650 5-speed transmission.
Designed to replace the T45, the TR3650 was the first production-based 5-speed to come out of the merger between Borg-Warner, manufacturer of the T45, and Tremec, a company best known in the Mustang world for its aftermarket Tremec 3350 (including the legendary TKO version) 5-speeds. "In general, the TR3650 represents an evolution of design from several sources," explained TTC’s Kevin Ryan. "With the T45’s T5-similar heritage from Borg-Warner and the Tremec TR3550’s track-proven durability, the design philosophies were combined in the TR3650 to provide extended durability with refined shift-ability and quiet operation." After the TR3650 5-speed’s production debut in the Bullitt Mustang at mid-year 2001, the new transmission also became the standard gearbox in all Mustang GTs and Cobras. It’s also a tremendous upgrade for owners of 1996 to early 2001 Mustangs, especially for the older cars that may be in need of a new transmission and, of course, for performance enthusiasts who require a stouter 5-speed for drag racing or spirited driving.
The TR3650 was designed as a drop-in replacement for the T45, requiring only minor modification to the back-up lamp switch pigtail in electronic speedometer 1999-to-present models because there is no gear-drive speedo in the TR3650.
The new TR3650 incorporates a number of design improvements, including its 360 lb/ft. torque capacity compared to the T45’s 325 lb./ft. This was accomplished primarily by the increase in the center distance from 81mm to 85mm. The TR3650 also provides an increase in synchronizer capacity, with a fully synchronized, constant-mesh , reverse gear train that produces a much more durable and smoother shifting operation over the double-disconnect T45 design, which produced in-consistent shift loads and block-outs. The TR3650s new multi-rail shift linkage, while retaining the track durability of the TR3550, has been refined to provide the enhanced shiftability delivered in the T45. Utilizing state-of-the-art materials, the overall TR3650 package provides increased durability and smoother shifting with lower effort operation.
Adopting TTC’s "Fill for Life" philosophy, the TR3650 uses premium synthetic ATF ( Mobil1 ) as the factory oil fill, as opposed to the Dexron III used in the T45. This change is an improvement that demonstrates TTC’s long-term durability focus for its products.
By taking the best of Borg-Warner’s T45 and the strength of the TR3550, TTC-Tremec has created a production 5-speed that offers both smooth shifting on the street and speed-shifting durability for the track. It’s a great upgrade, not only for 2002 4.6 Mustangs but also as a T45 replacement in earlier models. –MP
Not all '01 Mustangs got the new TR3650 tranny. The easy way to find out if a Mustang is fortified with 3650 goodness is to kneel down and look for the drain plug on the bottom of the tranny. The plug on a T45 is located on the side.
hot news / tech / subscribe / events / home | 
12-08-03, 06:45 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: March 2002
Posts: 44
| | Please, if you don't know what your talking about with regard to the difference between the T45 and the 3650 don't confuse the issue. No way the T45 was/is more durable. It is clearly inferior to the 3560 and the 31 spline setup.
Get the '01. | 
12-09-03, 01:20 AM
|  | GoldMember | | Join Date: April 2000 Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,097
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by lafear01 Naz is correct.
OT: Naz, but your snake is a bit of a factory freak IMHO...  | Lafear,
You may be right. I just hate to see these 99 vs. 01 deals. Yes, is true they have a few diferences here and there, the intake may be a tad better, the splines count, the seats, the CD player and the bumper....dont let me forget the polished rims option but they are the same. Then it came the coment about "power" and is not completly correct. Yes, we have some weak 99s but I have seen a bunch of "weak" 01s as well.
They are great cars, if the 01 still has some warranty and less milleage, if the $$ vs. $$ makes sense then the 01 is the better purchase.
and by the way......I dont think mine is a freak  Just abnormal!
Naz | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | | | |