Mustang Forums at StangNet

?Please Help?: Late 67 Mustang ID & Axle Plate Conundrum + Brake ??

This is a discussion on ?Please Help?: Late 67 Mustang ID & Axle Plate Conundrum + Brake ?? within the Classic Tech forums, part of the Classic Mustangs category; Greetings! I have read & done a lot, know a little but hardly enough and still have doubts and questions. ...

Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustangs > Classic Tech

Over 151,000 Members!!

Register Vendors Garage FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



View Poll Results: Group Purchase - would you buy a best-quality fit Mandrel-Bent Exhaust System?

STOCK mandrel-bent ALUMINIZED system at a 10% discount? 0 0%
STOCK mandrel-bent STAINLESS system at a 10% discount? 0 0%
CUSTOMIZED (to your specs) mandrel-bent ALUMINIZED or STAINLESS system? 0 0%
SHOW-POLISHED mandrel-bent STAINLESS system? 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-05, 09:21 PM
Member
 
Join Date: October 2004
Posts: 1
?Please Help?: Late 67 Mustang ID & Axle Plate Conundrum + Brake ??

Greetings!
I have read & done a lot, know a little but hardly enough and still have doubts and questions.

Here’s today’s conundrum…

BACKGROUND: 1967 Mustang convertible (late build; June 1967)
ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT: 289 2bbl, AT (C4), factory AC, PS, PDB (4-piston iron calipers), motorized top and what I think 8” axle (see below to explain that one). The engine is being replaced with a 1969 351-W that has a Stage I rebuild (probably less than 350 HP) and a 1989 AOD from a Mustang GT.

ANOMOLY: Both the Body Style and Axle Tag Numbers do not match the 1967 factory Ford shop manual concerning:
Color: “D” is on the tag; the book lists no such letter.
Axle: “0” is on the tag; the book lists no such number.
Axle Tag: “WCZ V1” [top line] “2 79 FA 930” [bottom line]
The shop manual skips this series, going from “WCZ-V” (conventional 8” 2.79:1 ratio) to “WDY-C1”(conventional 8” 3.50:1 ratio). The axle ends have the flattened oval depression in the center, so I assume it is an 8”. If there was any reference to the bottom line of the axle tag, I have not found it [yet]. The bottom line is that I cannot be sure what is under there until I get some concrete references.
The real reason for all of this information is that I want to square away my brakes for the last time. I have an opportunity to purchase a complete rear end from a Lincoln Mark VII LSC and need to know if this is the smart way to go.
I purchased a Grenada/Monarch/Versailles rear disc axle but sold it because of the useless unsprung weight issue. I know about the UltraStang bracket approach to adapting Lincoln Mark VII rear disc brakes and that seems to be the best bet; however, I have also read about using Explorer brakes in a similar manner. There is also a Ford Motorsport kit using late model (SN95) Mustang rear brakes.
Does anyone out there have any objective experience based on my requirements of achieving a reasonable balance of economy with safety & performance?

FRONT BRAKES: I converted the front spindles, brakes & tie-rod ends to Grenada/Monarch/Versailles for extra strength & cheaper maintenance; although I have questioned this “sidegrade” as in my experience, 4 pistons from both sides of a caliper perform better than one single-sided caliper.
Did I screw up a good thing by fixing something that wasn’t broken? Should I keep this setup or go to something better? I am at a point where I have to decide how to proceed NOW and having some words of wisdom would really be a comfort.

Thank you in advance for sharing your experience, my friends!

Mark from Maine
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-05, 05:45 AM
Founding Member
 
Join Date: September 2000
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 10,216
Yea, you've got an 8" rear. 9" didn't come with a 2.79 ratio. Explorer rear brakes will not fit ( not a bolt on deal), Another possibility for rear discs are the ones found on 90's Crown Vics and Marquis.I've heard they will bolt onto the early Stangs. Just because some book doesn't list an option doesn't mean your's isn't original. There were cars special ordered with stuff the books don't always list, and the books have been known to be wrong, many times.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-05, 02:46 PM
My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
 
Join Date: February 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,978
The "D" code for the exterior paint is Acapulco Blue. What did I win?!
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Here's the New Mustang Lineup Ford should build! 351CJ 2005 - 2009 Talk 68 06-19-06 08:40 PM
Why a dissapointment - I say the new Mustang is a winner! sondesign 2005 - 2009 Talk 29 01-05-04 04:11 PM
1965 mustang brake / clutch pedal support compatibility. rufusbooth Classic Tech 4 12-29-03 02:32 PM
67 Mustang disk brake conversion question mje Classic Tech 4 12-15-03 03:22 AM

 




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 AM.