View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-06, 02:09 AM
JJ95GTID's Avatar
JJ95GTID JJ95GTID is offline
Official Member
 
Join Date: September 2003
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 965
The article was okay. A little too short and not technical enough to really get its point across. The article made it seem like modding a 94-95 just wasn't worth the headache because of the EEC-IV in our cars. Well, we all know you can mod a 94-95 if you use the right parts. There is no shortage of exhaust choices for our cars. And, there are OTS cams designed to work with the vacuum needs of the 94-95 ECU. There is more but I don't want to ramble too much here because you already know what I am getting at with this.

I will admit that mod for mod a Fox will be quicker than a 94-95
I would still rather own and drive my 95 over a Fox anyday


I too am a fan of the horizontal tail lights. Just seems like one of the only ways to tell if a Mustang is a 94-95 from a quick glance. And, I believe our cars are unique in a good way.


No offense to 5.0 Mustang & SF or its authors. I have had a subscription since I bought my Mustang in April 2002 and enjoy the magazine throughly.
Reply With Quote