Mustang Forums at StangNet

Alignment specs with C/C plates

This is a discussion on Alignment specs with C/C plates within the 5.0 Tech forums, part of the 5.0 Mustang category; I just finished up the install of my MM caster camber plates. Everything went smoothly and i have it "Roughly" ...

Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustang > 5.0 Tech

Over 153,000 Members!!

Register Vendors Garage FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-06, 05:19 PM
ninety15.0's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: March 2004
Posts: 1,341
Question Alignment specs with C/C plates

I just finished up the install of my MM caster camber plates. Everything went smoothly and i have it "Roughly" aligned right now. (Framing square and a level) I have an appointment for wednesday to get the front end aligned but i wanted to double check on the specs. Maximum motorsports suggests about 3.0 degrees positive caster for high speed stability and 0.5 deg of negative camber. These numbers seem to make good sense to me....what is everyone else running on their lowered stangs?! thanks in advace!
-Nick
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-06, 09:06 PM
Founding Member
 
Join Date: September 2002
Location: Napa, California
Posts: 937
Not meaning to threadjack but i am about to order these, how did the install go? good quality? and i also would like to know what everyone else is running
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-06, 10:55 PM
ninety15.0's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: March 2004
Posts: 1,341
I would definately reccomend them. The quality is top notch and the kit is very complete it comes with everything you need and an awesome set of instructions. The first side took us about 1.5 hours b/c i had to change out the sway bar end links at the same time. The second side probly only took like 1 hour. Could have done everything faster im sure but we were taking our time...(and drinkin some beers). The hardest part was getting the dust boot over the bump stop. The alignment adjustment seems real easy to make. I used a 3 foot level and a framing square and aligned it pretty good for now so im sure they will be able to dial it in at the shop.

Last edited by ninety15.0; 08-19-06 at 10:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-06, 09:58 AM
ninety15.0's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: March 2004
Posts: 1,341
Anyone have their alignment specs with c/c plates?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-06, 10:12 AM
PoopDawg's Avatar
Autozone Junkie
 
Join Date: June 2002
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,405
There's no need to change from the stock settings unless you are going for a lot better handling. I have mine set up with -1.0 camber both sides for better contact patch around turns, and just a tad more positive caster. Toe is the same. Works good.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-06, 10:37 AM
ALMOST STOCK's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: September 2000
Location: CA.
Posts: 1,192
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoopDawg
There's no need to change from the stock settings unless you are going for a lot better handling. I have mine set up with -1.0 camber both sides for better contact patch around turns, and just a tad more positive caster. Toe is the same. Works good.
Exactly the same setting I have on my alignment.. Works great.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-06, 12:30 PM
ninety15.0's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: March 2004
Posts: 1,341
As per MM instructions for street cars and what i have heard elsewhere; Positive caster can be increased as much as possible. There effects of 1 degree change in caster is negligable so 3+ degrees is fine. Increased positive caster with increase the amount of negative camber on the outside wheel when turning hard. That is why positive caster is more desireable. Apparently -0.5 degree of toe (toe-in) is normal and desired for stability. Every adjustment to the toe will drastically effect the camber. So Camber should be adjusted last to about -0.5 degrees +/- 0.25 degrees. I dont want my tires to be wearing out any faster than they already do!? So i want to keep the camber in check, as too much neg. camber will really wear tires out quickly. Anyone else have any input? Road racers?
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Front Alignment with C/C plates. abusedstang 94-95 Tech 2 08-05-05 01:18 PM
specs for c/c plates? mijo_latino 4.6 Tech 4 04-08-05 09:01 PM
Pro3i C/C Plates installed...still wont go to spec! HELP!! ScortLX 4.6 Tech 4 02-29-04 08:16 AM
Urethane bushing or steel bushing C/C plates? SmockDoiley 5.0 Tech 4 02-25-04 02:42 AM
Report: Mach1 struts/shocks, MM C/C plates Rootus 94-95 Tech 10 01-07-04 02:03 AM

 




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 AM.