Mustang Forums at StangNet

K&N Air Intake System

This is a discussion on K&N Air Intake System within the Mach 1 forums, part of the Special Production category; Is this a good system? I was thinking of buying this intake for my 04 mach and wanted to check ...

Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > Special Production > Mach 1

Over 151,000 Members!!

Register Vendors Garage FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-07, 01:10 PM
Member
 
Join Date: April 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8
K&N Air Intake System

Is this a good system? I was thinking of buying this intake for my 04 mach and wanted to check to see if anyone had any opinions on it. I did a search but didn't come up with anything about the system on the mach 1.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-07, 02:39 PM
Crzyhrse's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: December 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 955
Alot of people had problems with the K@N CAI causing stalling. Supposedly the culprit was people took the screen out of the inside of the CAI. Leave it in. I had the K@N CAI but the screeen being left in was'nt my problem. It stalled no matter what. I ditched it and bought the C@L Tru-Flo Intake. Never had a problem since. JLT is suppose to be a good one. MRT is a good one also.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-07, 03:48 PM
Member
 
Join Date: April 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crzyhrse View Post
Alot of people had problems with the K@N CAI causing stalling. Supposedly the culprit was people took the screen out of the inside of the CAI. Leave it in. I had the K@N CAI but the screeen being left in was'nt my problem. It stalled no matter what. I ditched it and bought the C@L Tru-Flo Intake. Never had a problem since. JLT is suppose to be a good one. MRT is a good one also.
Good to know. Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-07, 10:23 AM
TR03Mach1's Avatar
GoldMember
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Castle, Delaware USA
Posts: 455
I went with the C&L intake setup for reasons other than the performance gains of the intake alone. It's a good, solid intake, and when used in conjunction with their 85mm MAF and Mach 1 air box, performs great with no stalling or surging issues.

Click the image to open in full size.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-07, 01:03 PM
Member
 
Join Date: April 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by TR03Mach1 View Post
I went with the C&L intake setup for reasons other than the performance gains of the intake alone. It's a good, solid intake, and when used in conjunction with their 85mm MAF and Mach 1 air box, performs great with no stalling or surging issues.

Click the image to open in full size.
That kit looks really nice. Hows the nitrous in these cars? I Had nitrous in my camaro ss and that car just loved the juice.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-07, 10:42 AM
TR03Mach1's Avatar
GoldMember
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Castle, Delaware USA
Posts: 455
These cars seem to really love any type of FI, nitrous, sc, or turbo. Just as long as you don't go nuts with it on the stock bottom end.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-07, 01:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: April 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 42
I'm looking at teh C&L myslef, why would we really need a 85mm MAF? What size is the stock TB?

Also wouldnt you need a retune for the MAF to work right?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-07, 02:36 PM
Give Me TP's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: June 2004
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 984
Quote:
Originally Posted by 32valves View Post
I'm looking at teh C&L myslef, why would we really need a 85mm MAF? What size is the stock TB?

Also wouldnt you need a retune for the MAF to work right?
The C&L system doesn't use a new MAF per se, it uses a 85mm MAF housing with the stock sensors. A tune is almost a guaranteed requirement, as the C&L tends to significantly lean out the A/F ratio.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-07, 05:15 PM
TR03Mach1's Avatar
GoldMember
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Castle, Delaware USA
Posts: 455
He's right, it's kind of a misnomer to say MAF, when it's actually the stock MAF electronics in a 85mm MAF housing. I never had the leaning out issue with the C&L unit, even with nitrous. It was so on the money, I went back to the stock tune while running a 100 shot of nitrous!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-07, 03:07 PM
Mach1man22's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: October 2006
Location: Charlottesville, Va.
Posts: 48
Ah who needs C&L when you can run with JLT, eh? I know I do.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-07, 04:05 PM
Crzyhrse's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: December 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 955
When I went to get a dynotune a couple years back, I was actually running rich with my C@L, X-pipe, and Catback. They leaned it out to get it back up to 12.8-13.2 range. Never had a problem with C@L on my Mach, nor my '93 GT that I had a C@L 73mm Mass Air meter on. People that knock them don't know what their talking about.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-07, 07:09 AM
sabrooks's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: October 2002
Location: Phenix City. Alabama
Posts: 229
no problems with my K&N filter but maybe thats because I have a tune
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-07, 09:06 PM
trav_19's Avatar
Super Stanger
 
Join Date: October 2006
Location: Jackson, MI
Posts: 844
Quote:
Originally Posted by TR03Mach1 View Post
I went with the C&L intake setup for reasons other than the performance gains of the intake alone. It's a good, solid intake, and when used in conjunction with their 85mm MAF and Mach 1 air box, performs great with no stalling or surging issues.

Click the image to open in full size.
i have a c&l on my 94 and it does seem to be a really good brand i know its not a mach but i figured i would throw that in there... we are in the market for a mach and i always see the c&l for that tube but what about the other one in the front is there some replacement for that one?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-07, 09:34 PM
Crzyhrse's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: December 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by trav_19 View Post
i have a c&l on my 94 and it does seem to be a really good brand i know its not a mach but i figured i would throw that in there... we are in the market for a mach and i always see the c&l for that tube but what about the other one in the front is there some replacement for that one?
If you buy the C@L Tru-Flow Intake for the Mach 1, you'll get the Intake tube, the 85mm housing and a 9" K@N conical filter. They also sell just the Intake tube all by itself.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-07, 10:52 PM
trav_19's Avatar
Super Stanger
 
Join Date: October 2006
Location: Jackson, MI
Posts: 844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crzyhrse View Post
If you buy the C@L Tru-Flow Intake for the Mach 1, you'll get the Intake tube, the 85mm housing and a 9" K@N conical filter. They also sell just the Intake tube all by itself.
oh so the kit comes with both tubes thats cool
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-07, 07:18 PM
Member
 
Join Date: April 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 42
no..no shaker tube
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-07, 09:02 PM
bullitt784's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: October 2001
Location: coral gables, fl
Posts: 751
i think i'm gonna go with the c&l eventually
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-07, 10:12 PM
Crzyhrse's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: December 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by trav_19 View Post
oh so the kit comes with both tubes thats cool
Like 32valves said, not the shaker tube in front. I thought you were talking about the housing in front of the mass air meter. But you can get your shaker tube chromed if you want. That's what I did to mine. Expensive though , unless you do it yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-07, 01:22 PM
Founding Member
 
Join Date: April 2002
Location: Houston(Clear Lake)
Posts: 192
I have the K&N and it does stall every great once in a while.

I have debated going to the JLT, it seems to give great power.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-07, 02:08 PM
Crzyhrse's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: December 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by KeithCobraUH View Post
I have debated going to the JLT, it seems to give great power.
I've read more than afew times on M1R of guys getting the JLT and saying it's a very tight fit or does'nt fit correctly.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-07, 09:37 PM
jdoug's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: September 2005
Location: SoFla
Posts: 11
Just for the record since it hasn't been mentioned yet, you don't HAVE to get the C&L intake with the 85mm MAF housing. I'm using it with the stock MAF housing but with their conical filter and filter cover. You do have to use their filter cover because the intake pipe won't fit otherwise (I tried).
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-07, 09:38 PM
JOEGTS's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: July 2005
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL
Posts: 154
I have the K&N and have had know problems whatsoever. My car put down 324/341 with a Diablosport tune.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-07, 10:21 PM
Crzyhrse's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: December 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEGTS View Post
I have the K&N and have had know problems whatsoever. My car put down 324/341 with a Diablosport tune.
I hope that's with more than a K@N and a tune, or that shop is blowing some serious smoke up your ass.

*Edit* I saw your Long Tube post, so you have more than that.

Last edited by Crzyhrse; 06-10-07 at 10:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:17 AM.