Mustang Forums at StangNet

Are factory 3.73's common........

This is a discussion on Are factory 3.73's common........ within the 2.3L Mustang Talk forums, part of the 2.3L Mustang category; ............in a 4-cylinder automatic? Being the giant melvin I am, I decoded the door tag (with my handy dandy "Catalog ...

Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > 2.3L Mustang > 2.3L Mustang Talk

Over 151,000 Members!!

Register Vendors Garage FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-08, 07:35 AM
bonestock87's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: December 2001
Location: East TN
Posts: 531
Are factory 3.73's common........

............in a 4-cylinder automatic? Being the giant melvin I am, I decoded the door tag (with my handy dandy "Catalog of Mustang ID Numbers 1964-1/2 - 1993") on this '93 hatch I just picked up. I found that the axle code is "6" meaning a non-locking 3.73. Just curious if this gear is common from the factory.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-08, 08:25 AM
Red_LX's Avatar
Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need porn pics!!
 
Join Date: August 1998
Location: Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Posts: 9,386
If you consider every 2.3 auto car from '87-93 "common", then yes

As far as I know, in that year range, every 2.3 automatic had 3.73 gears behind it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-08, 09:47 AM
bonestock87's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: December 2001
Location: East TN
Posts: 531
Well, that makes sense. I know the automatic cars need quite a bit of help getting up from a dig. I had assumed that 3.45's were the gear of choice from Ford though, don't know why I assumed, but I did. Thanks for the info! Any day that I learn something new about a Mustang I didn't know previously is a good day.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-08, 04:51 PM
85_SS_302_Coupe's Avatar
it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
 
Join Date: November 2003
Location: Near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 3,084
I'm pretty sure just about all the Tbirds had 3.73...or suffice to say every rear end i've seen come out of a Tbird had them.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-08, 10:03 AM
Red_LX's Avatar
Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need porn pics!!
 
Join Date: August 1998
Location: Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Posts: 9,386
In '87-88, 5 speed cars had a 3.55 trak-lok, autos had a 3.73 trak-lok (and an 8.8 rear, of course)

Prior to that ('83-86) everything had a 7.5 and I THINK they were all 3.45's.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-08, 12:13 PM
04YELLOWGT's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: June 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red_LX View Post
In '87-88, 5 speed cars had a 3.55 trak-lok, autos had a 3.73 trak-lok (and an 8.8 rear, of course)

Prior to that ('83-86) everything had a 7.5 and I THINK they were all 3.45's.
Wait so 87-88 2.3 had an 8.8?

What about an 89 5spd?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-08, 12:49 PM
bonestock87's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: December 2001
Location: East TN
Posts: 531
Never did a 2.3 have an 8.8-inch rear ('cept the SVO's). And unless it was special orderable (is that a word) 7.5's did not have trak-lok.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-08, 02:25 PM
Red_LX's Avatar
Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need porn pics!!
 
Join Date: August 1998
Location: Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Posts: 9,386
Sorry about that, my post was referring to turbo coupes, not Mustangs.

And the SVO did not have an 8.8, it had a 7.5.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-08, 10:20 PM
04YELLOWGT's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: June 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonestock87 View Post
Never did a 2.3 have an 8.8-inch rear ('cept the SVO's). And unless it was special orderable (is that a word) 7.5's did not have trak-lok.
I didn't think they did that why I was asking. LOL

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-08, 09:00 PM
white 89 GT's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: April 2003
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonestock87 View Post
Never did a 2.3 have an 8.8-inch rear ('cept the SVO's). And unless it was special orderable (is that a word) 7.5's did not have trak-lok.
My 85 gt had 7.5 posi and it looked like my 8.8 trak lok.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-08, 01:01 PM
bonestock87's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: December 2001
Location: East TN
Posts: 531
Quote:
My 85 gt had 7.5 posi and it looked like my 8.8 trak lok
Sorry, I was only referring to 2.3 litre cars, I'm sure the pre-'86 V8 cars had the 7.5 locker.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-08, 02:01 PM
Red_LX's Avatar
Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need porn pics!!
 
Join Date: August 1998
Location: Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Posts: 9,386
The 7.5 came standard with a trak-lok in early GT's (up to '85 I think? Maybe '86 also), and in early turbo coupes, '83-86. Oh yeah, and in early Rangers, although the axle housing itself was set up for leaf springs (and I've also been told that's a cheap way to get 4.10's).

I don't even think the trak-lok was available in the 2.3L Mustang, but I could be wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:31 PM.