Mustang Forums at StangNet

302 EFI

This is a discussion on 302 EFI within the MII Discussion forums, part of the Mustang II category; I have a question about the 302 EFI. I was told not to mod up a 302 form 1986 and ...

Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > Mustang II > MII Discussion

Over 151,000 Members!!

Register Vendors Garage FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-09, 10:09 PM
KH! KH! is offline
Member
 
Join Date: November 2006
Posts: 43
302 EFI

I have a question about the 302 EFI. I was told not to mod up a 302 form 1986 and 1987, to use the one from 88 and up becuase the mod changes would hurt the engines performance and driveability. Does it really matter or did the guy I talk to blow smoke up my ass?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-09, 05:10 PM
Wart's Avatar
I'm Mad as HELL and I'M not Gonna Take it ANYMORE!
 
Join Date: September 1998
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 2,560
I'm just a puppy with EFI, so I may be wrong,

I believe '88 was the first year for Mass Air, but only in a few applications. I believe most applications continued using Speed Density.

I believe Mass Air adjusts to modifications (because it's an actual measurement of the mass of air being ingested) where Speed Density pretty much follows a "map" and is limited in compensating for mods, if it compensates at all.

What I've learned (I believe) is changing from SD to MA is not very difficult involving little more than the changing of the computer and valve body.

If I'm wrong I hope someone tells us about it.

fordfuelinjection.com/ seems to have a bit of info on this.

{link}Link to a table{link}

Last edited by Wart; 03-27-09 at 05:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-09, 08:45 PM
Project 77's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: June 2002
Location: Bernville PA
Posts: 501
Your very close Mark...88 was the first year for mass air in CA, all others were converted to mass air in 89. I converted an 87 Saleen to mass air with a kit from FMS. It's not very hard, kit includes a pigtail that plugs into the computer, a MAF meter with all the p[roper plastic and rubber pieces, and plugs to plug off the MAP sensor I believe.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-09, 08:47 PM
Project 77's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: June 2002
Location: Bernville PA
Posts: 501
I forget which year it is, I believe 86 used flat top pistons, NFG when trying to use any kind of performance heads. I think it's 92 that used forged pistons, excellent for mods. Someone correct me if I am wrong
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-09, 02:14 AM
KH! KH! is offline
Member
 
Join Date: November 2006
Posts: 43
So 86 and 87 stinks without MAF, convert to MAF and then mod, that's the rule of thumb?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-09, 02:24 AM
KH! KH! is offline
Member
 
Join Date: November 2006
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Project 77 View Post
I forget which year it is, I believe 86 used flat top pistons, NFG when trying to use any kind of performance heads. I think it's 92 that used forged pistons, excellent for mods. Someone correct me if I am wrong
Well Alcino used a 86 block and trick flow twisted wedge cylinder heads on his mustang II.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-09, 09:42 AM
Project 77's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Join Date: June 2002
Location: Bernville PA
Posts: 501
that is correct if you try to mod a EFI car with speed density it can get sticky, SD does NOT do well with cam changes. As far as motors, you could use an 86 motor if the pistons are fly cut for the heads, and I know from experience you have to fly cut the pistons with TFS heads if you use a cam with a large profile.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-09, 11:15 AM
Member
 
Join Date: April 2005
Posts: 7
EFI

It is better to use a mass air setup as it responds better to mods. The speed density can be converted with a harness and computer if you already have one. But if you plan to do the GT 40 intake/Vortech route, the mass air flow works much better. You may have minor hood issues depending on spacers, but the rest pretty much fits. We recently installed one with a Tremec TKO in a car for my daughter. With less weight than a Fox 5.0 it runs well.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:08 PM.