Mustang Forums at StangNet

Write up for: spark_min_for_tip-in_retard

This is a discussion on Write up for: spark_min_for_tip-in_retard within the 94-95 5.0 Tuning forums, part of the 94-95 Tech category; Is there a write up for the scalar "spark_min_for_tip-in_retard" or how it is no longer one the scalars for the ...

Go Back   Mustang Forums at StangNet > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustang > 94-95 Tech > 94-95 5.0 Tuning

Over 151,000 Members!!

Register Vendors Garage FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-09, 10:57 AM
cobramanphil's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: April 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 37
Write up for: spark_min_for_tip-in_retard

Is there a write up for the scalar "spark_min_for_tip-in_retard" or how it is no longer one the scalars for the cbza/j4j1

Sorry it has been a while for me (have not self tuned for years as the car has been a garage queen for so long). How is timing between shift controlled now as my new tweecer software download seems to have eliminated that scalar for me.

Phil

Last edited by cobramanphil; 09-21-09 at 06:04 PM. Reason: mental breakdown
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-09, 07:12 PM
qikgts's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: November 2001
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobramanphil View Post
my new tweecer software download seems to have eliminated that scalar for me.

Phil
That's the issue right there... Sorry I can't be of more help, but...

Have you thought about making the switch over to Binary Editor and EEC Analyzer? It's way better than the "Cal-Crap" duo... I can attest to BE being well supported and easy to use...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-09, 06:23 AM
cobramanphil's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: April 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 37
I do have EA, but I have not payed for a license for BE.

Anyone else? I imagine the controlling factor have moved somewhere else in the software (perhaps on a x/y table somewhere)? I just have not found in my current searches
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-09, 08:43 AM
final5-0's Avatar
Official Member
 
Join Date: April 2003
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 6,513
I understand your frustration

Being a long time Tweecer user using the original V of software

After seeing how things changed with the 1st & 2nd upgrades

I made what I believe was a wise decision to stay with the 3rd V

I saw how many peeps couldn't find things (just as you speak of here)
and
The many complaints about things got more complicated in datalogging

I'd help you if I could
as
I have a basic grasp of the pcm and what is needed for various mods
but
I just don't know anything about the later software

I'd bet you can find your answer with a search at eectuning.org
or on the site Wes put together

Grady
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-09, 12:46 PM
cobramanphil's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: April 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 37
Thanks Grady. If all turns up well I will post my findings. This particular scalar is probably one of the first changes a newbie would make for the 94/95 cars. I felt is made a big difference especially when your working with different timing settings (especially with the power adder crowd)

I'll post it up for everyone once I get all the details..should help

You still have the original version of the software Smart move. I should have known better, but in this "always upgrade, latest software is better" attitude I fell into the trap
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:31 AM.