 | | 
11-04-09, 08:42 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: September 2003 Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 114
| | Poor CL behavior, WOT = OK, help ???
The wife has a 2001 GT SOHC stock engine.
This 80K car recently has began to stumble upon acceleration...and you can hear what sounds like a "mild" miss when idling. The only time this car seems to be doing it's job is at WOT.
- I've used throttle body cleaner on the TB
- Electrical cleaner on the MAF
- Cleaned/reoiled the K&N air filter
- Replaced plugs and plug cap wires
Several months back and for regular maintenance reasons only, I replaced the rear O2 sensors. I had intended on replacing the more important front sensors, but did not have the special socket to make that job easy.
In short, it seems the car is having issues when idling and/or under load. I would presume this is under Closed Loop operation. At WOT (Open Loop), I cannot discern any problems...she (the car) screams.
Would disconnecting the battery (ie. resetting the PCM) and reconnecting 30 minutes later provide any more valuable information to this forum ?
Any ideas or suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
-D | 
11-04-09, 09:09 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: August 2009 Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 266
| |
Do you have access to an ODB2 scanner? If so, post the long term fuel trim at idle and part load. Fuel pressure, IAC percent, evap purge valve, MAF, injector pulse width, and O2.
Even better is to data log this through a take off.
The 4.6 is bad about water pooling in the spark plug holes. Try removing the COP's and blowing out with compressed air.
Some ODB2 scanners can activate the Ford cylinder power balance test. This helpful trying to locate a misfiring COP.
Might try disconnecting the battery. Not really sure it will make any difference in this case.
Note, my 2003 has a slight bump in the low part throttle take off. Usually happens around 2k. Goes away at heavy throttle. It's not bad enough to make me try to find it (lazy learned to live with). | 
11-04-09, 10:01 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: September 2003 Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 114
| |
As mentioned, we are planning to keep this car for some time... So I have thought about scanners for diagnostic purposes. I've just been avoiding the subject as I didn't want to drop 100's of dollars on a tool I did not yet need.
I'm working with Tweecer and other software components for my 5.0 projects, so I'm not adverse to spending money on tools and equipment.
I obviously need to do some homework for this 4.6 engine as I know the PCM is much more advanced than my EEC.
Any suggestions on make/model scanner ? Do they all provide datalogging functionality ?
Point me in the right direction...I'll do the homework.
TIA | 
11-05-09, 01:26 AM
|  | Official Member | | Join Date: April 2006 Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 216
| | | | 
11-05-09, 03:49 AM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: September 2003 Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 114
| |
It appears that these TPS units cannot be adjusted as they could on 5.0s.
Are you recommending I replace the TPS ??
Is there a means to confirm (with voltmeter) that the unit is not working correctly -OR- is the expectation that these units begin to fail with higher mileage/time ???
I twice attempted a search in the 4.6 forum for "TPS" and got nothing. That can't be right.
Last edited by DonMaximo; 11-05-09 at 04:17 AM.
| 
11-05-09, 04:51 AM
|  | Official Member | | Join Date: November 2004 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 437
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DonMaximo It appears that these TPS units cannot be adjusted as they could on 5.0s.
Are you recommending I replace the TPS ??
Is there a means to confirm (with voltmeter) that the unit is not working correctly -OR- is the expectation that these units begin to fail with higher mileage/time ???
I twice attempted a search in the 4.6 forum for "TPS" and got nothing. That can't be right. | Look in here for answers about you TPS 4.6 Tech Important Threads (NEWBIES, HERE FIRST) . Also I have a Equus Innova 3130 scan tool. It's does datalogging much easier than that xcal along with other things. I paid 135 for mine on ebay. You can also check out their web page. When you pull up the thread look under "Engine" heading. Pearl02 | 
11-05-09, 07:42 AM
|  | Official Member | | Join Date: January 2003 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,354
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DonMaximo The wife has a 2001 GT SOHC stock engine.
This 80K car recently has began to stumble upon acceleration...and you can hear what sounds like a "mild" miss when idling. The only time this car seems to be doing it's job is at WOT.
- I've used throttle body cleaner on the TB
- Electrical cleaner on the MAF
- Cleaned/reoiled the K&N air filter - Replaced plugs and plug cap wires
| 2001s don't have wires or a "cap": They have individual COPs (coil-on-plug), one for each cylinder and thus no wires and no need for a distributor or its cap or rotor. What did you actually replace?
Also, do not clean the TB with solvents or sprays. You can remove a special factory coating and that can lead to idling problems.
Do you see an MIL (check engine light)? | 
11-05-09, 08:34 AM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: September 2003 Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 114
| |
Sorry... didn't have the specific technical term... I replaced the COPs & plugs.
As for cleaning the MAF, there is a product called Mass Air Flow Sensor cleaner and it's made by CRC. And it is a good idea to use for a higher mileage vehicle such as ours. Particularly when you're having problems and want to rule out the simpler/cheapest solutions first.
No MIL light.
I went to the NEWBIES site listed above and found no reference to how to test the existing TPS.
There are 3 wires on the TPS. If I knew which to test for "+" and "-", I could determine what the default voltage is at idle and could determine if voltages bounce around as I smoothly open TB. In all honesty, I just learned that the TPS will cost $40, so I'm just going to replace it.
Will keep the old one if this provides no fix.
**********************************************
I'll be doing some reading about scanners today. Already got a thumbs-up for the EQUUS, but in good conscience I need to understand all options before opening wallet.
Thanks for the reply | 
11-05-09, 12:36 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: September 2003 Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 114
| |
It's NOT the TPS
Cleaned MAF again... I've heard about K&N oil messing these up sometimes = No Help
Disconnected battery, allow KAMs to zero out. Will restart in 1 hour.
Will replace fuel filter, but I seriously doubt that's the issue as I can here gargling at idle.
It's a cheap part.
Unless any one else has some idea, no matter how crazy, I'm planning to purchase a OBD2 scanner. | 
11-05-09, 12:53 PM
|  | Official Member | | Join Date: April 2006 Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 216
| |
There are only 3 things that will give you your symptoms.
1. bad TPS
2. vacuum leak
3. fouled plugs.
I just changed my TPS the other day because I had a stumble during acceleration, surging idle, and hard starts so I knew what it was right away. Tested the TPS first and it tested fine but still replaced it and all problems were fixed.
Since you changed your plugs I doubt its that.
Check for vacuum leaks, if you have a vacuum leak it is more then likely the evap vacuum source. | 
11-05-09, 12:57 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: Lancaster PA
Posts: 104
| |
did you try cleaning or replacing the IAC? has it ever shut off on you randomly? | 
11-05-09, 02:53 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: September 2003 Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 114
| |
Good points...
I just cleared the KAM (ie. disconnected battery for 2 hours)... now it's running worse.
Even WOT is worse. Almost like the Keep Alive Memory was helping the car prior to clearing KAM...
Really starting to wonder if O2 sensors have had better days. They are original on this 80K car.
It's my understanding that KAM set a baseline for WOT. At WOT the PCM would go into Open Loop and check on O2 sensors for modifications. Anyone disagree ?
Definitely gotta get scanner on this before I dump $100 on a pair of O2 sensors. | 
11-05-09, 03:20 PM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: June 2002 Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 1,817
| |
Nope, computer ignores the O2 sensors in open loop.
It's unlikely that the O2s are so far gone at 80K that the car won't run OK with them. Sounds to me that whatever the problem is, clearing the computer wiped out whatever adjustments it made to work around the issue and so it will take a while for the car to readapt. You may be on to something with your vacuum leak idea but your original description sounds like a run of the mill misfire except that you should notice some loss of power and a some vibration at WOT too, although they do smooth out some at higher RPMs if it's not so bad that you can't rev under a load at all. If it's an auto, maybe the torque converter is helping to smooth things out too
Go through everything again thoroughly. Make sure all COPs are seated firmly and connectors are secure, check the plugs holes for fluids and debris, make sure no plugs have backed out, check gap on plugs and inspect for fouling or other symptoms, inspect COPs for any sign of damage. | 
11-05-09, 04:06 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: September 2003 Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 114
| |
Patman,
I did find 2 minor vacuum leaks and repaired them, but that provided nominal improvement.
I started checking plug wells...2 from each side...they're dry and clean as a whistle.
I agree with you on the O2 sensors... I was reaching...If they failed to work altogether, I would have expected a MIL.
Not intending to get off course, but we did have to replace the fuel pump 2-3 years back...and that makes me wonder.
Our intent is to keep this car so I was going to shop for OBD2 scanners/tuners. I already received a recommendation for Equus...but I'm also curious about these Predators. There's a hefty price difference between the two and I expect we'll always keep this car stock.
Any recommendations on a OBD2 scanner would be appreciated.
-D | 
11-05-09, 04:07 PM
|  | Official Member | | Join Date: April 2006 Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 216
| |
It's the damn TPS. The computer ignores the o2 sensors during open loop, hence the reason it is called open loop. The computer only reads ect,iat,maf and tps to determin fuel tables at wot. Change out your tps. | 
11-05-09, 04:09 PM
|  | Official Member | | Join Date: April 2006 Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 216
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DonMaximo Patman,
I did find 2 minor vacuum leaks and repaired them, but that provided nominal improvement.
I started checking plug wells...2 from each side...they're dry and clean as a whistle.
I agree with you on the O2 sensors... I was reaching...If they failed to work altogether, I would have expected a MIL.
Not intending to get off course, but we did have to replace the fuel pump 2-3 years back...and that makes me wonder.
Our intent is to keep this car so I was going to shop for OBD2 scanners/tuners. I already received a recommendation for Equus...but I'm also curious about these Predators. There's a hefty price difference between the two and I expect we'll always keep this car stock. Any recommendations on a OBD2 scanner would be appreciated.
-D | Yeah go to auto zone and have them scan it for free. | 
11-05-09, 07:24 PM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: March 2002 Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,639
| |
Do a search on "AC Ripple". Seems most times people forget to check that when they are having this sort of problem. Could be bad diodes in your alternator that's affecting your computer. | 
11-05-09, 08:07 PM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: June 2002 Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 1,817
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by GDawg Do a search on "AC Ripple". Seems most times people forget to check that when they are having this sort of problem. Could be bad diodes in your alternator that's affecting your computer. | What is the procedure for testing for this at home - I did a search a while back and couldn't find anything other than "do a search for 'AC Ripple'"
I was getting odd behavior on the dash voltage gauge so I tested mine - it seemed to check out by the book procedure for DC but I still suspected something was wrong so I tested for AC with first a digital multimeter at both the battery and at the alternator and I was getting 30V AC. That sounded unlikely so I tested again with an analog meter in case the digital one was getting freaked out by non-sine wave AC but it also showed 30V AC which would have to be pretty much fully unrectified AC coming out of there. Then I took it to Autozone and had them test it and they confirmed a bad diode in the alternator. I didn't have any driveability problems (unless it was contributing to the poor mileage I've been having lately) but, like I said, the gauge was not showing the usual charging patterns and I'd just replaced a battery and I didn't want a bad alternator killing the new one too. | 
11-06-09, 09:13 AM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: September 2003 Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 114
| |
Was thinking...
8-9 months ago, I replaced the stock throttle body & upper plenum and a C&L unit. Now I'm wondering if that resulted in minor changes to my PCM KAM since that time.
I'm going to put my original unit back on, disconnect battery for a while, and see if this mitigates the stumbling. | 
11-06-09, 11:28 AM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: August 2009 Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 266
| |
Hasn't it run OK for 6 months? Haven't you allready disconnected the battery with the aftermarket intake?
IMO, you are reaching to think this is a PCM KAM problem from an intake swapped out 6 months ago.
The PCM KAM is erased each time the battery is removed. | 
11-06-09, 12:04 PM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: September 2003 Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 114
| | Problem Solved
8+ months back I replaced the stock TB and upper plenum with a combination from C&L. Pretty much a plug and play "WITHOUT" resetting KAM by disconnecting the battery.
I just reinstalled the original TB/plenum, flushed the KAM, built the KAM and now the car is working properly again. Very refreshing to say the lease.
I can only suspect that over time the KAM settings being captured by the PCM and C&L combo may have resulted in bad data for the PCM. I don't feel particularly confident about this hypothesis yet as I would have expected the PCM to adapt to this slight improvement in air flow and take LAMBSEs & HEGO into consideration when calculating injector pulse width.
I ordered an SCT flash device yesterday. Once I come up to speed on it's functionality, I'll reinstall the C&L setup and will tune accordingly. MANY MANY thanks again to all who participated in this thread. Without this forum, this problem resolution would have taken much longer
Sincerely,
Darryl | 
11-06-09, 01:26 PM
|  | Official Member | | Join Date: April 2006 Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 216
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DonMaximo 8+ months back I replaced the stock TB and upper plenum with a combination from C&L. Pretty much a plug and play "WITHOUT" resetting KAM by disconnecting the battery.
I just reinstalled the original TB/plenum, flushed the KAM, built the KAM and now the car is working properly again. Very refreshing to say the lease. I can only suspect that over time the KAM settings being captured by the PCM and C&L combo may have resulted in bad data for the PCM. I don't feel particularly confident about this hypothesis yet as I would have expected the PCM to adapt to this slight improvement in air flow and take LAMBSEs & HEGO into consideration when calculating injector pulse width.
I ordered an SCT flash device yesterday. Once I come up to speed on it's functionality, I'll reinstall the C&L setup and will tune accordingly. MANY MANY thanks again to all who participated in this thread. Without this forum, this problem resolution would have taken much longer
Sincerely,
Darryl | That is in no way how the ECU works. After 3 run cycles the ECU would have relearned the settings after changes.
What all did you swap (TB, Plenum, IAC, TPS,)? | 
11-07-09, 08:16 AM
| | Official Member | | Join Date: September 2003 Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 114
| |
Only the TB & Upper plenum were replaced 8 months back.
When the problem originally began to surface, I replaced plugs, COPs, and cleaned the air filter, MAF meter, and TB. Then I replaced the TPS. None of these relatively cheap solutions fixed the problem.
Then I purged the KAM...and the problem was more pronounced.
It's that simple...
Then I reinstalled the original TB & plunum, took the car for a 15 minute drive around town and it's like new again.
As for rebuilding KAM, how do you define a cycle ? | 
11-07-09, 10:10 AM
|  | Official Member | | Join Date: April 2006 Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 216
| | | | 
11-08-09, 02:29 PM
|  | Founding Member | | Join Date: March 2002 Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,639
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by patman0911 What is the procedure for testing for this at home - I did a search a while back and couldn't find anything other than "do a search for 'AC Ripple'"
I was getting odd behavior on the dash voltage gauge so I tested mine - it seemed to check out by the book procedure for DC but I still suspected something was wrong so I tested for AC with first a digital multimeter at both the battery and at the alternator and I was getting 30V AC. That sounded unlikely so I tested again with an analog meter in case the digital one was getting freaked out by non-sine wave AC but it also showed 30V AC which would have to be pretty much fully unrectified AC coming out of there. Then I took it to Autozone and had them test it and they confirmed a bad diode in the alternator. I didn't have any driveability problems (unless it was contributing to the poor mileage I've been having lately) but, like I said, the gauge was not showing the usual charging patterns and I'd just replaced a battery and I didn't want a bad alternator killing the new one too. | Never test with anything but a DMM (Digital Multi-Meter). Don't use an Analog. You were probably getting 0.30vAC and just reading it wrong. 0.30vAC is okay. Anything higher than 0.40vAC is too high. Hence, if it was 30vAC you are looking at major computer screw ups...! | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |