403hp at rear wheels no super or turbo

Status
Not open for further replies.

geneos5546

New Member
Feb 11, 2006
44
0
0
wisconsin
"]thats right no supercharger no turbo ]2007 gt/cs 5 speed 410 gears steeda cai sct tuner under drive pulleys short throw shifter fast intake comp cams denso plugs 103 octane tune (using experimental fast intake is not in production yet but theres one on my car thanks to my brother in law )car dynoed at 403rwhp 420 torq:lol: :nice: :nice: :nice: :nice: :nice: :nice: :jaw: :jaw: :jaw: :jaw: :jaw:
 
  • Sponsors (?)


That's around 130 HP more than stock(manual trans)at the rear wheels. The intake and 103 tune would have to account for about half of that! I would want to believe that being that I would love that kind of power while staying N/A, BUT only time will tell.
 
like i said guys, a computer will let you type anything you want on it...i don't think you would see that kind of improvement at the crank...hell, on the old 5.0's you had to have a trick cam, heads, intake and some other stuff just to get 300-350 at the crank, so i highly doubt the new mustangs will do it with that little bit of mods, even with a tune for 103 octane...i'll believe it when i see it first hand...
 
Lets see how his mods add up: cai & tune-30hp
cams-35hp
pulleys- 10hp
manifold+cmds-20hp
So the total is 395 crank hp, which is pretty close to the guy's numbers if he really means at the crank.



Also I heard that people are not happy with the FAST intake manifold, so FAST is redesigning it. It took them until the 2007 model year to even release news about it,but it is not even selling yet. Now that they are redesigning it,who knows how long it will be before they finally release it for sale. Anyone is better off just porting their intake at a performance shop since the FAST intake isn't coming out anytime soon.
 
like i said, i have to see it first hand to believe the fairy tell you are telling...sorry man, but unless you have a prototype intake with direct port nitrous injection, there is just no way...

i figured it out guys, he has a direct port nitrous injection and stand alone fuel management system, not a bad way to spend $10,000...
 
Lets see how his mods add up: cai & tune-30hp
cams-35hp
pulleys- 10hp
manifold+cmds-20hp
So the total is 395 crank hp, which is pretty close to the guy's numbers if he really means at the crank.

the title to this thread reads at rear wheels! not crank! and to the wheels, i don't believe it...he don't even have any exhaust mods, not only do you have to get more air fuel in to the engine, you have to get the exhaust out of it...
 
interesting...

still... a few bolt on's and a $600 125hp NO2 set up would yield similar numbers, more miles/gallon, make a better daily driver, and et's may even be lower... wonder which is a better choice??

:p :p :p

Let me guess, you will soon be selling them thru brother in law;)

Good luck with set up.
 
I was saying that the mods he had would only be able to make 400hp max at the crank. I dont believe at the wheels either. He needs LT headers,high flow mid pipe with high flow cats, and cylinder heads. The closest I have heard is someone who had 367rwhp WITH cylinder heads,cams, shorty headers,o/r x with flowmasters,cai,93 tune, and cmd's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.