BBK Longtubes here. They have dragged on occasion.
Just because one person with longtubes does not drag, does not mean everyone will not.
It depends on where you live, drive, and how often.
There is a time, place, engine, etc. for a short tubed header.
I would concentrate more on increasing the o.d. diameter and collector length. The longtube will take care of the collector length, and the diameter is based on you.
You will gain a solid amount, just off the o.d. change alone, not short and long tubes.
For a longtube comparison, here is my
real world situation:
I had a 162k bottomend (1993). This was topped off with AFR 165, OTB Performer Intake, and a custom camshaft, rusted out Mac 1.625" headers (pinched).
I decided to make a few changes, after a couple circumstances. The local track (that I frequent most) is a 1000 ft. track. Best run, off the street was a 10.65 @ 97.98 MPH with the combination above.
Okay, the changes I made were, rebuilding the bottomend (306). I used Probe's 030-10682 pistons (9.6:1 now), with more swept volume that will increase compression. KC did the bottomend.
I also replaced the old rusted short headers, with new BBK Longtubes and a new Offroad H (no dents like my last pipe). I then had Tom Moss port the lower to match the AFR 165cc heads, and he matched them great. Looking down the port, it matched the flange nicely. I even trimmed the gaskets (not done before), cleaned everything as clean as possible as well.
So these three changes were made:
- 306 (slightly more compression)
- Longtubes with H-pipe
- Ported lower to match AFR 165
- RP synthetic tranny fluid
After several runs throughout the next year, the best run I could get was 10.56 @ 99.31 MPH.
I kept the same exact timing, fuel pressure, driver weight, tire pressure, etc. I noticed a little more pull about 5300+ RPM, which I attribute to the lower porting by Tom.
A total gain of 1.33 MPH and .09 seconds. So roughly 13.30 HP.
I feel if you are going to get headers from scratch, go for longtubes, but do not believe the hype on how much better they are.
By the way, the "302 parts make 302 power" is a total fluke. It is based off some truth and some exaggeration.
Just look at Paul's ride. There are literally thousands of cars like his. If you increase the cubes, you increase the power (same top-end).
A 302+ style rotating assembly is lighter than a 351+ rotating assembly. That is more power, cube per cube.