TRICK FLOW HEAD INFO!!!

  • Sponsors (?)


Now my car originally made 294 RWHP, 320 RWTQ un-corrected on a Mustang Dyno in Orange, Texas with little run time on the engine. The SAE correction factor for that time in Orange was 1.027, manual calculating it with the weather data from the time the car was on the Dyno.

TSS:nice: Heard nothing but praise when it comes to tuning the modulars
 
Still crying about my engine, Bill?:shrug:

Are you sure MD has said that about my car? Close friends of KenB have been known to call you an idiot/moron when you first started crying about my engine out performing your 5.4 3V...

Now my car originally made 294 RWHP, 320 RWTQ un-corrected on a Mustang Dyno in Orange, Texas with little run time on the engine. The SAE correction factor for that time in Orange was 1.027, manual calculating it with the weather data from the time the car was on the Dyno.

SAE Corrected on the Mustang Dyno, the car made 302 RWHP, 329 RWTQ.

It is a well known fact that a properly calibrated Mustang Dyno will show 8 - 12% less RWHP/RWTQ than the same corrected/uncorrected Dyno-Jet in Inertia mode will.

My Uncorrected numbers for a Dyno-Jet would be ranging from 318 - 330 RWHP and 346 - 358 RWTQ.

SAE Corrected, they would range from 326 - 338 RWHP and 355 - 368 RWTQ.

You were told that by very close friends of KenB's who know a thing or two way back when you first started crying about my car.

Are you are telling me that an engine that made between 326 - 338 RWHP with next to nothing for run time and a restrictive dual exhaust system can not achieve 10 - 22 RWHP with about 10,000 - 12,000 miles on it and a non-restrictive exhaust system? If you are, well... I will leave it at that.

It is well known that when my car had it's Big-Bore installed, the car ate an accessory belt on the drive down to Texas and that it started to eat the brand new one on the way home and I have had problems with accessory belts. It took almost 2 years to find that the Power Steering pump was the problem. That PS Pump may have played a factor in the original numbers as well.


settle down. i dont care what you make. you will not compare to these heads no matter what SVO this or that you do. that was the point. and i could also care less that you make more power. with a good intake (which doesnt exist) i would murder your numbers.
 
settle down. i dont care what you make. you will not compare to these heads no matter what SVO this or that you do. that was the point. and i could also care less that you make more power. with a good intake (which doesnt exist) i would murder your numbers.

You flat out questioned my cars current numbers saying that it wasn't possible and tried using KenB and Tim Barth to help you out. I addressed your concerns.

Who said I was not going to these new heads? I have not ruled that out and I am on the list to get these new heads...

As for you murdering my numbers, you said that over 2 years ago and you still are not even close...
 
The other thing that guys have to realize, is that even with the newer stangs out, people still mod 2v's. Did you see the 5.0 market shut down when the mod motors came out? No. All this is going to do is not only offer us one more option, but also have other manufacturers look to us as a potential for profit when this head sells. So this will kick start other gusy to start kicking out heads for us. Remeber the days when nobody could find any manifold besides a Bullit? Now a year and change later we have 4 or 5 options.