ablaz11 said:I wonder if the leather in the 05 will be of better quality than the current mustang. Because I'm not sure if I'm alone on this but I think right now, the quality sucks. Also looking at some pictues I think we'll finally see leather in the back.
vrpirata said:If it is the same then I'll get cloth
1of3901SpringGT said:Yeah the current leather sucks. No matter how much I conditioned it you could still see some small cracks. I guess it is just normal wear because I have seen most mustangs with much worse wear then mine.
ablaz11 said:I wonder if the leather in the 05 will be of better quality than the current mustang. Because I'm not sure if I'm alone on this but I think right now, the quality sucks. Also looking at some pictues I think we'll finally see leather in the back.
USAF-Sergeant said:I'm very disappointed in what I'm reading. I have never owned a vehicle with leather seats and was HIGHLY looking forward to getting the red-accent trim that's going to be offered as an option in the new Stang. Now, I'm not so sure.
Could someone post some pics of how there leather has faded/torn or whatever so I can see what I might be getting into. I currently have cloth in my '91 T-Bird and '93 Grand Marquis. Was looking forward to a nice change of pace. What do you all suggest?
Thanks
The Germans and the British know how to do leather. Real hides, real thick, real durable. It's the only way to go in those upscale cars. But the cheap-o leather that's been in Mustangs for the last couple decades? I think it's more akin to "pleather" than real leather, and it's cheesy in comparison. If I was buying a Porsche or a Jag or a Bimmer, she'd be leather. But my Mustang would be cloth unless Ford steps it up a notch with their cowskin. I'm keeping an open mind for the '05, I don't think any of us have plopped our fanny in one yet.Good or bad quality, leather is aways a better choice than cloth.
RICKS said:The leather that all 3 of the U.S. automakers use blows