Im not talking about drive train here,,how does the ride quality,braking,and handling compare with these 2 models!! I never drove a 94,,95 stang.Is there a big difference here??
willys1 said:Im not talking about drive train here,,how does the ride quality,braking,and handling compare with these 2 models!! I never drove a 94,,95 stang.Is there a big difference here??
Im gonna go on record here,it concerns exhaust tone.I never liked the 4.6 exhaust sound because it was always too quiet,and different from 5.0's.But until recently Ive been hearing some 4.6's with after market exhaust,and engine mods.Holy Sh@t They have a higher rev then the 5.0,but still have that deep small block Ford growl Im not saying I like it better then 5.0's,,but I'll tell you what,its rite up thereAl J said:I've had Fox 'vert & now have an SN-95 convertible.
They are worlds apart in build quality.
Newer body has no rattles, no leaks & no wind noise.
Fox has all of the above.
As for looks---that's in the eye of the beholder.
willys1 said:Im gonna go on record here,it concerns exhaust tone.I never liked the 4.6 exhaust sound because it was always too quiet,and different from 5.0's.But until recently Ive been hearing some 4.6's with after market exhaust,and engine mods.Holy Sh@t They have a higher rev then the 5.0,but still have that deep small block Ford growl Im not saying I like it better then 5.0's,,but I'll tell you what,its rite up there
dstanggt50 said:I had an 87 gt conv w/similar setup as mine, minus intake, t/b, and was an aod w/2400 stall, 4.10's, subframes, and I still prefer the 94-95. Like most people said, handles better, better chasis, ect...
Only the earlier Fox's had the small discs. All '86-'93 V8 Fox Mustangs had the 10.8 inch rotors up front. Either way, the rest of the system was plain crap as you mentioned.5spd GT said:...and the Gt has 10.8in disc brakes in front and 10.5 in the back...a far cry from those "baby" disc in the fox and those musical instruments in the back (drums)...