Dyno'd my 05 GT ---> 384rwhp/373rwtq

  • Sponsors (?)


Looks peaky to me -- like if you overlaid that curve on the stock curve, it wouldn't look much better until about 3000 rpm. OK for racing, though.

It would probably be a monster with twin-screw supercharger.

EDIT - I meant to ask if you use the variable valve timing, or is it disabled.
 
scro said:
Looks peaky to me -- like if you overlaid that curve on the stock curve, it wouldn't look much better until about 3000 rpm. OK for racing, though.

It would probably be a monster with twin-screw supercharger.

EDIT - I meant to ask if you use the variable valve timing, or is it disabled.



good question... i'll contact sct and blow-by and see what they did for the tune.
 
mach1dsg said:
oopps, it looks like you and bbr can not backup such claims with REAL numbers.

sorry pal, but you guys, shouldn't be playing with people HARD EARNED MONEY. that is nothing but bs and really bad for you guys bussines :damnit:

http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=707198



WTF are you talking about? real numbers? how much more real do you need? call up SCT and have them explain it to you personally. Call up Blow-By and have walk you threw everything. Wow, I love these boards... one guy voices his opinion and all the followers HAVE to agree. :rlaugh: :lol:
 
hahahaha, you're so freaking funny, i don't need to call sct or bbr, maybe they need contact fourcam330, maybe you should go out from your small word and do a simple dyno and shut some people up, what's up with that????
you seem to be going around circles, and it wasn't me who put you through it.
sorry pal :) :lol:
 
All the things I see on here about Blow-by-racing seem to be advertising attempts by the company itself. There are always the same set of pictures, and they're all posted together but are from all different stages of completion of this project, with different parts on in each picture. And his dyno charts are the exact same ones as on the web site. It just looks like some intern went to the site, grabbed a bunch of info and pictures, and then started posting as a happy customer. This combined with the fact that 90% of the links on their page simply don't work, well it just doesn't inspire confidence in me. But I could be wrong and they might be a fantastic company.
 
mach1dsg said:
hahahaha, you're so freaking funny, i don't need to call sct or bbr, maybe they need contact fourcam330, maybe you should go out from your small word and do a simple dyno and shut some people up, what's up with that????
you seem to be going around circles, and it wasn't me who put you through it.
sorry pal :) :lol:



I don't see any problem with re-dynoing the car.

It's just ashame that no one trusts SCT's Dyno :shrug: I mean, most people do use and stand by SCT products... don't they?
 
Standing by to see the results of this. Sounds like a bunch of BS. Pretty easy to fudge a bunch of numbers, until you get called out. Seems theyll be facing the music soon enough. It would be great if you prove everyone wrong, and your business attempt will make killer money on the great performance gains, but my guess is you will soon be :owned:

No one likes liars :bs:

PS. this is linked all over the mustang boards communities, Ive seen it on all of them I have been on. :damnit:
 
89gtstalker said:
Standing by to see the results of this. Sounds like a bunch of BS. Pretty easy to fudge a bunch of numbers, until you get called out. Seems theyll be facing the music soon enough. It would be great if you prove everyone wrong, and your business attempt will make killer money on the great performance gains, but my guess is you will soon be :owned:

No one likes liars :bs:

PS. this is linked all over the mustang boards communities, Ive seen it on all of them I have been on. :damnit:


this could be very easily resolved if someone would just contact SCT themselves and have them send you a copy of the dyno sheet that they have on file. Nothing was modified or changed on the sheet. I don't see how these numbers are not possible... their are 2V making close to the same power :shrug: But we'll see what happens.
 
The dyno sheet is not going to verify that what you said was being run was actually in the car. Does the dyno sheet verify that its the stock compression? Stock internals? What ever else you claim? Look, people shouldnt bust your B@lls I guess, but if you make a claim, why is it such a big deal to back it up? It would happen eventually, You think people who pay for these upgrades arent going to Dyno the cars when there done? Look at it as saving yourself a lawsuit in the long run, and if these do flow like you say, look at is as shutting up all of these people doubting you. Wasnt there a class action law suit against ford for the cobras and GT's in late 99, early 2000 because the cars didnt have the horsepower they claimed?

The back and forth discussion is not necessary, there is an opportunity to prove you product, so do it. What do you have to hide?
 
I could make a dyno sheet stating 1000hp NA in photoshop, and there'd be no way to disprove me. This is internet people. Believe or not, but if you're not gonna challenge someone to a person-to-person proving of power, what's the point of calling someone out?

On the heads, they modify the stock heads you provide?

Definitely interested on pricing n all...
 
89gtstalker said:
The dyno sheet is not going to verify that what you said was being run was actually in the car. Does the dyno sheet verify that its the stock compression? Stock internals? What ever else you claim? Look, people shouldnt bust your B@lls I guess, but if you make a claim, why is it such a big deal to back it up? It would happen eventually, You think people who pay for these upgrades arent going to Dyno the cars when there done? Look at it as saving yourself a lawsuit in the long run, and if these do flow like you say, look at is as shutting up all of these people doubting you. Wasnt there a class action law suit against ford for the cobras and GT's in late 99, early 2000 because the cars didnt have the horsepower they claimed?

The back and forth discussion is not necessary, there is an opportunity to prove you product, so do it. What do you have to hide?


Nothing to hide at all... I just don't have time to go dyno a car whenever I feel like it. I have a life outside of the internet and the car... that is why it has been a year and it's only this far. If I devoted all my time and money to this car. I would have a built bottom end, the blower would be on the car... but I have other prioritys... Like my family and my house. I'm sure some of you understand the concept of life.
 
change of strategy now???? :lol:

people know you're just giving a bunch of bullcrap away: sema, pri and now you're devoted to your family and house??? , oh my god..., it's a dyno for christ sake, is not like you're replacing the engine/trans, and it's even free for you :rlaugh:

bur whatever, you guys won't go too far away with this :bs:
i'm sure you guys would be famous for this the 384rwhp show :notnice:
 
zero3mach1dsg said:
change of strategy now???? :lol:

people know you're just giving a bunch of bullcrap away: sema, pri and now you're devoted to your family and house??? , oh my god..., it's a dyno for christ sake, is not like you're replacing the engine/trans, and it's even free for you :rlaugh:

bur whatever, you guys won't go too far away with this :bs:
i'm sure you guys would be famous for this the 384rwhp show :notnice:
yup... you have a great life too :notnice:
 
Damn, that's sad. If their numbers were even slightly lower, and verifiable, I'd prolly look to squeezing as much na power as possible, rather than going blown. I'd have kicked their door in for their "bundle".

That thread is an eye opener, and no mistake. Whether you trust one side or the other is moot - the true bottom line is that BBR (and all their incarnations, nom de plums, DBA's, aka's) look real fishy.

Cash will decide whether I finally do go blown or not. If I don't, I'll be looking at numerous upgrades, many of which are listed for this car. If BBR had shown a modicum faith in their numbers (and, again, even if they fell a few horses short of the tests baseline), I'd have probably enquired about their packages. Not so now.