MOTORWEEK review of Mustang

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kingelvis

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
2
0
0
I'm not a regular poster, and not even a Ford person really, but I watched last night's edition of "MOTORWEEK" with Jon Davis and crew and was amazed at how much they fawned over the car.

Craig Singhoff is a big muscle/Mustang fan so he had to love it, but the text of the review sounded about as positive as ANY review I've ever seen on the show.

They seemed to think the solid axle wasn't 'crude' at all - it does have a panhard rod and a differential link to eliminate axle hop. They had absolutely nothing bad to say about the axle. Frankly, I think it's fine too.

Acceleration numbers were only for 0-60mph (five seconds flat) and the 3 valve engine has boosted power to be more than competitive with other domestic V8s.

They raved over handling too, but it was in the looks department that the MOTORWEEK crew really flipped. Davis ALWAYS SOUNDS LIKE HE'S YELLING, but in this case he really did seem amped up with enthusiasm in describing the true to 1960s side scoops, trisegment taillights and fastback roof.

I like the way he ended the review by talking about how this could be the kind of car that could end the SUV monoculture - a nice zesty taste of sport and fun in comparison to the dour, wallowing (when not tipping over) SUV.

The Verdict: Ford has an out of the park grand slam with the new Mustang.

I'm kind of partial to the new Charger, but for $5000 less, I'd be crazy to pass up the (much better looking/honest to god 2 door) Mustang GT.

Think about it, the hot to trot Neon SRT is $22,000 - for not much more you can have an honest to God supercar

Thank you FoMoCo.
 
  • Sponsors (?)


i'm sold buy an "05" mustang gt!!!

MT mag said auto ran 0-60 5.1 & 1/4mile 13.6 / tv said 5.0(flat). & they said a 5 speed should run 0-60 4.8-4.9 & 1/4 who knows 13.4est!! That's damn good! from what i read early on in summer it had best 13.8est because of the weight but from what i'm hearing now 13.6 from a auto wow! If this is true that a 5 speed will run mid 13s or better when they hit the streets i'm sold! mid oct. can't wait!
 
midnighttorch said:
MT mag said auto ran 0-60 5.1 & 1/4mile 13.6 / tv said 5.0(flat). & they said a 5 speed should run 0-60 4.8-4.9 & 1/4 who knows 13.4est!! That's damn good! from what i read early on in summer it had best 13.8est because of the weight but from what i'm hearing now 13.6 from a auto wow! If this is true that a 5 speed will run mid 13s or better when they hit the streets i'm sold! mid oct. can't wait!
Not to mention it's faster than the 390 hp 04 Cobra =)
 
cnash said:
Not to mention it's faster than the 390 hp 04 Cobra =)

2004 Cobra specs:

General Information
Price: $--,---
Miles Per Gallon: 16/24 mpg
Curb Weight: 3665 lbs
Layout: Front-Engine/RWD
Transmission: 6-Speed Manual
Engine
Type: Supercharged V8
Displacement: 4601 cc
Horsepower: 390 bhp @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 390 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm
Redline: 6500 rpm
Performance
0-60 mph: 4.5 sec
0-100 mph: 10.4 sec
Quarter Mile: 12.6 sec @ 112 mph
Skidpad: .90g
Top Speed: 155 mph (limited)
Braking, 60-0 mph: --- ft
Slalom Speed: --.- mph
 
stock 04 cobras are about .2 secs faster in the 1/4 and 0-60.
Btw ford has announced they will not be making a new cobra they are making a GR-1 instead.
Also the cobra is supercharged as the 05 gt is not.
 
GR-1? I thought that was equivalent to a ford GT which is a 100k+ car. The cobra will be made as will the new lightning...i dont know where your getting your info but its wrong.

kirkyg
 
cnash said:
stock 04 cobras are about .2 secs slower in the 1/2 and 0-60.
Btw ford has announced they will not be making a new cobra they are making a GR-1 instead.
Also the cobra is supercharged as the 05 gt is not.
Actually Ford hasnt announced that, maybe you should stop making **** up. It's already known SVT is developing another Mustang Cobra.

And no, stock 04 Cobras are a stable mid 12 sec car that easily dips into low 12's, and can you name a track that you can race a 1/2 mile on?

BTW, Why dont you let us know what the GR-1 is.. You are speaking about the Shelby GR-1 concept correct? Which Ford has released no information about putting into production as of right now.
 
kingelvis
they gush about every car they test. look up their test of the 74, i bet they loved it.
I will test drive them myself and form my own opinion. It does LOOK good i admit. I'll also be reading stangnet to see stories from early buyers. "ask the man that OWNS one" (old packard slogan)
 
This time they seemed particularly ga ga - even more than usual.

I've never owned a Ford (only an AMC Rebel that used Ford's C-4 automatic and the electrical system) but the new Mustang is pretty darn tempting.

My lease will be up in 2005 and the Mustang is currently at the top of my list as a new car because of:

1. Classic supercar appearance

2. 300hp

3. Evidently, it will be the lowest priced V8 performance car in the US.

4. Rear seat is actually usuable for passengers

5. Sized just right for practicality/room compromise

I must say that I'm a bit surprised some seem sad to see the old Fox Mustang go. They were fast - posting 14 second e.t.s bone stock as early as 1985 but they were always much uglier than the Camaro.

The T-Bird was major flop - should have been a four seater and sold for less money - like the 1983 Vintage which re-established the T-Bird rep after the god-awful '80.

This Mustang, however is the tonic Ford needs (and needs badly) to bounce back.

Now they just need to stretch the wheelbase and give us an honest to god Torino fastback intermediate as the Nascar flagship to replace the prosaic Taurus.
 
Whoa... calm down there.

Torino...? Is there anyone other than die hard Ford fans who would even know what that was?

I like the 68-69 Fairlane/Torino too... but there's no way Ford will ever recreate it.
 
Fox44ever said:
Whoa... calm down there.

Torino...? Is there anyone other than die hard Ford fans who would even know what that was?

I like the 68-69 Fairlane/Torino too... but there's no way Ford will ever recreate it.


Whoa...don't bring a thread back to life after a year of dormancy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.