BLUE03GT
New Member
like is said before the Ford GT stock has run 11.2's at over 133mph... show me a ZO6 stock running LOW 11's @ over 130mph.... please id love to see it...
BLUE03GT said:like is said before the Ford GT stock has run 11.2's at over 133mph... show me a ZO6 stock running LOW 11's @ over 130mph.... please id love to see it...
We're talking Ford GT....not Mustang GT. And no....a C6 Z06 will not waste a Ford GT. You want proof, check out every head to head comparison ever done between the two.akb93 said:Maybe not A Z06 but a stock C6 Z06 would waste a stock GT, if it can't waste a GT I wan't proof
akb93 said:Maybe not A Z06 but a stock C6 Z06 would waste a stock GT, if it can't waste a GT I wan't proof
akb93 said:but a stock C6 Z06 would waste a stock GT, if it can't waste a GT I wan't proof
Uncle Meat said:You sure that's a C6 in that video and not a C5? Sure didn't sound like the new C6....
Yup, I’d have to agree, from a roll at those speeds its pretty even between the two, but if going from a dig or running both cars out to top end....it gets pretty ugly for the Corvette. That's where the GT's underrated, positive displacement blown 550hp/500lbs ft/tq does the talking. You Z06 lovers have got to keep in mind that the GT is a car geared to run at top end. Yes it’s got ungodly bottom end power too, but that’s thanks in full to the added grunt provided by the 2.3L Twin Screw under its bonnet. As it sits, the GT has a 16mph top speed advantage over the Z06 and at over 200mph…..that’s a f***ing HUGE difference.CatmanJJ said:Seems pretty darn even to me.
Gearbanger 101 said:As it sits, the GT has a 16mph top speed advantage over the Z06 and at over 200mph…..that’s a f***ing HUGE difference.
I've seen tests where the GT has run as fast as 214mph. If I remember correctly when they tested it on "Top Gear" they talked about taking it up to that speed once as well. You're right though, it was originally meant to run 205mph.....same as it's original GT40 predecessor. But I guess with that much more power on tap they beat the projected margins by a fair amount.CatmanJJ said:What's the C6 Z06 top speed? supposedly testing showed that the Ford GT went even faster then the claimed 205 mph and got it up to 212 mph but discoverd lift at 205 so I guess that's where it is limited to.
http://media.ford.com/newsroom/feature_display.cfm?release=18759
"Two hundred and five mph is the top speed that the car is certified and electronically limited to," said McGowan. "In testing, we actually got a car up to 212 mph, which is redline in fifth gear. Sixth gear is too tall, so you run top speed in fifth. It got to 211.89 mph, and we were bouncing off the rev limiter in fifth gear and it was still accelerating. The whole objective is to make sure the car is extremely stable, and at 200 mph, it is actually a very comfortable car to drive. Obviously never do 200 mph on a public road. You ever see those signs that say professional driver closed track? I'm that guy."
PonyboyIsaac said:stole this from another message board, enjoy it
http://videos.streetfire.net/recentvideos/0/98c0da59-d89b-461e-aade-98100002e605.htm
hotmustang331 said:IMO you should do both...if you will ONLY do one or the other, that just shows that you scared.
ha ha woops, thats what i get for being lazy and not rereading the threadCatmanJJ said:
02LaserRed2V said:I agree 100%
It's funny how some here claim that racing from a roll is not true racing. To me, that's no different than ricers claiming the only "real" racing is in the twisties. Most prefer to run to their car's strengths. And bolt-on NA 2V GTs is stronger from a dig. I know many wont run from a roll because they're afraid they'll get beaten by a Stage 1 SRT4.
01Steeda said:I just dont see it as proof of anything.
Agreed 100%!!!01Steeda said:when John force takes the tree at a 60 punch... I'll start roll racing.. until then "DRAG RACING" is from a standing start. Now thats not to say I havent ever done it.. I just dont see it as proof of anything.
No offence intended Lazer, but perhaps it is you that hasn’t read all of the posts on the page!?!02LaserRed2V said:You obviously didnt read all the posts on this page.
Gearbanger 101 said:Last I checked a race required a finish line? Going from a roll requires nothing....and on top of that proves nothing. It doesn’t prove a vehicles performance potential, it doesn’t prove drivers skill and it doesn’t prove which car or driver is king of the hill! And on top of that, it’s even more dangerous than a legitimate drag race.
PonyboyIsaac said:i'm just gonna ad my 2 cents and maybe this had been said, but the point of roll racing i think, is to see which car is truly faster, not which driver has more skill. It might be stupid but it helps prove what car is faster if that is the question at hand.
Ever try to drag race 50 cars lined up one in front of the other and side by side all at the same time? When was the last time you saw horse racing go from a roll?02LaserRed2V said:And doesn't NASCAR start from a roll? Pardon me if I'm incorrect but I really don't follow stuff like that.