i was wondering how an aluminum drive shaft helps performance and what to expect. is it the lighter weight or the strength?
Mainly it's the lighter weight. Less reciprocating weight equals more RWHP. Same effect as using lighter rims & tires.brian98gt said:i was wondering how an aluminum drive shaft helps performance and what to expect. is it the lighter weight or the strength?
I think that would be highly optimistic. Even a carbon fiber driveshaft isn't worth that much.brian98gt said:thats what i kinda figured. so how much of a difference in the 1/4, a tenth or two?
brian98gt said:thats what i kinda figured. so how much of a difference in the 1/4, a tenth or two?
timeless2 said:This could turn into an endless debate, but my spin:
aluminum > cf > stock
Something about fibrous material handling all that torque just doesn't sit well with me.
I state my case based upon experience and I have seen 2 CF shafts splinter like wood at the road course. AL shafts will likekly never do this.BensBACobra said:I dont think lighter materials translate into being weaker. They certainly arent weaker than stock.
Won't argue with you on the basal concept of weight reduction, but the track record I've seen puts the minimal weight difference between AL & CF shafts as a lesser priority than reliability. In application, the CF shaft might get you to the finish line faster, but the AL shaft will get you there for certain (ceteris paribus).BensBACobra said:Besides, aren't some of the more heavier duty clutches for manual tansmissions significantly smaller in diameter compared to those that are "factory-like replacements?" Isnt the idea there to reduce weight also?