Has anyone checked out AJE's new front end?

Sure hope the put something in there to strengthen the top of the shock towers. Sure looks like its going to put alot more leverage at the top without the upper control arm. I would think it would want to flex the fenders in like that. (Dont see it as part of the kit?)
 
  • Sponsors (?)


LOL, I could see how ya'll would think that...

But like 10 sec goal said, I don't work for them. I'm in SD. But for so long there hasn't been a product that really helps out the Mustangs/Cougars/Falcons/Mavericks/etc if you wanted to make them into a serious drag car.
But it is out there now. This helps us because sooo many of the 'street type' heads up classes require stock type suspension. This kits fits the bill in many heads up classes. I realize many folks love these cars for many different reasons. Personally, I like to go fast, and look stock. :nice:

Regards the upper shock mount, you could still use the firewall support if you desired. That would be no problem...

The more options we have, the better for all...:nice:
 
Figured I'd complete the story...

The reason why I am talking about this is to get the word out. Alot of people want to go fast at the track. I am building a Turbocharged 70 Maverick with stock suspension, and looking to go 8's. So it is safe to say, I'm a bit off. :rlaugh: But I, along with a few people I know personally, have avoided early Fords for heads up, stock suspension, type racing because there wasn't an available bolt on suspension modification that was (tounge and cheek) affordable, bolt on friendly, and accepted by the racing sanctions. Now there is.

When I started my project ,a MII front suspension wasn't and still isn't a legal option. So I spent every dime I could to get the front suspsion working right. Roller perches, Front spherical bearings, Strange brakes, notched towers, rear steer rack, blah blah blah. If this kit was out a year ago, I would have gone with it. But it wasn't so now I have to do things all over again.

There is a reason that the majority of the Fastest Street/Small tire type cars are Fox bodies. Because there is an aftermarket out there supporting those platforms. Here is some new technology to support our Early Ford platform, and I am glad to see it. Hopefully, others are too.

Sorry so long, I just want to make sure that its clear why I'm yapping so much. :)

Blown 65, I just wanted to add that I also have J bars coming out of my firewall, through the upper shock mounts, and down to the front frame. Since I am not turning any corners, that should firm things up nicely.

:nice:
 
The reason why I am talking about this is to get the word out. Alot of people want to go fast at the track. I am building a Turbocharged 70 Maverick with stock suspension, and looking to go 8's. So it is safe to say, I'm a bit off. :rlaugh: But I, along with a few people I know personally, have avoided early Fords for heads up, stock suspension, type racing because there wasn't an available bolt on suspension modification that was (tounge and cheek) affordable, bolt on friendly, and accepted by the racing sanctions. Now there is.

When I started my project ,a MII front suspension wasn't and still isn't a legal option. So I spent every dime I could to get the front suspsion working right. Roller perches, Front spherical bearings, Strange brakes, notched towers, rear steer rack, blah blah blah. If this kit was out a year ago, I would have gone with it. But it wasn't so now I have to do things all over again.

There is a reason that the majority of the Fastest Street/Small tire type cars are Fox bodies. Because there is an aftermarket out there supporting those platforms. Here is some new technology to support our Early Ford platform, and I am glad to see it. Hopefully, others are too.

Sorry so long, I just want to make sure that its clear why I'm yapping so much. :)

Blown 65, I just wanted to add that I also have J bars coming out of my firewall, through the upper shock mounts, and down to the front frame. Since I am not turning any corners, that should firm things up nicely.

:nice:



will your sanctioning body allow a front steer steup? i noticed you said you used a rear steer rack and the AJE setup is front steer not rear steer.
 
BNickle,
I guess I didn't come across clear, my fault. duh.
Originally, when we were modding the factory suspension, we were going to go w/ an Omni rear steer rack, attached to a modded belly bar.
Now, with this setup, we will use the front steer Pinto rack w/ bumpsteer kit.
And yes, the PSCA will allow this kit. What is cool is that alot of sanctioning bodies have already allowed similar kits for the early Nova's/Chevy II's. You know the Chebbies get the love first! Its all basically a bolt on front clip.

96 DOHC Cobra,
Yeah, it ain't the best. What specific question do you have regarding the kit? I may be able to answer it. Or you can give them a call. Jim, or Anthony were very helpful with me. :nice:

Thanks!
 
$2300 - $2477! :(
I can get a MII set up for less from Heidts. At least the last time I checked.
I guess your paying for the ease of installation.

Ta-Da!!! March special!!!

http://www.ajeracing.com/specials.php

For a straight line car, this should be the real deal. AJE has specialized in Fox and SN95 drag car parts. I'd bring the front bars from the cage thru the firewall, pick up the strut tower, then down to the front rails. It would be plenty strong. You can notch the towers back to gain some room.
 
This makes me happy, I was going to drop more than $2150 on just a manual steering rack and control arms, for the price I'd think this is pretty much a steal. Now people who want to do DOHC conversions have another option when running with notched towers.
 
I was never greatly fond of it because as the suspension compresses the wheel doesn't stay level with the ground.

I've heard that said several times about mcpherson strut. Surely the camber gain designed into the front suspension is similar in the different styles of independant front suspension - leading to the same performance with respect to suspension compression.

I know that the camber gain would start slowing and eventually change direction after a point, but that point (in a well-engineered setup) is beyond full suspension compression right?
 
Classic Performance For Mustang

Her's a scan of the CPP suspension for the Mustang.
CPPMustangScan.jpg
 

Attachments

  • CPPMustangScan.jpg
    CPPMustangScan.jpg
    67.3 KB · Views: 144