What do you guys recomend using for a 5 lug swap. Either 94-95 spindles or the 96+ spindles and why? I know that the 96+ widen the track slightly, but I am wondering if this is perfered or if the 94-95 is the way to go.
Thanks
Thanks
Another spindle question?
- Thread starter 69clark
- Start date
-
Sponsors (?)
PUNISHER RACING
Active Member
Depends on the car alot of Fox cars don't like the extra 3/8 of track the 96 up kit gives for tire clearance reasons
I used '94 v6 spindles and it seems like most people use the '94-'95 ones to keep the same track width.
Since most people use newer model Mustang wheels when doing a 5 lug swap its preferred to use those spindles instead of '96+ ones because of the offset.
If using aftermarket wheels you can use either spindle as long as you get the right backspacing.
Since most people use newer model Mustang wheels when doing a 5 lug swap its preferred to use those spindles instead of '96+ ones because of the offset.
If using aftermarket wheels you can use either spindle as long as you get the right backspacing.
Well, I guess I understand the wheel fittment issue, but I would probably do a custom wheel so I could order what ever offset I need. So besides the wheel fitment issue, are there any other advantages?
PUNISHER RACING
Active Member
Georgie
New Member
Shakerhood
Dirt-Old 20+Year Member
Shakerhood
Dirt-Old 20+Year Member
About a Year ago someone on the Corral put up the Blueprints for the Spindles, 94-95s will increase your Stock Track Width by about 5mm per side, the 96-04s will add "another" 8mm per side. If you have Bumpsteer Issues you can stick with 94-95s and use 91-93 Tie Rod Ends or a Bumpsteer Kit, the 96-04s seem to handle Bumpsteer slightly better. My personal choice is to stick with 94-95s.
SuperStang83
Founding Member
It is easier to use the 94-95 spindles if you are going with a common wheel, but if you are going custom you can get away with either.
8mm is about 5/16"....not 3/8". Take an 8mm socket out of your tool set and look at the gap....it isn't much at all. I am using them with my 81 notchback. Reason....I am using the 2001 rear end. That puts the wheels out 1-1/2" on each side outward. So I will take all I can get on the front. 8mm will be better than nothing. It won't hurt either way.
PUNISHER RACING
Active Member
Shakerhood
Dirt-Old 20+Year Member
It is actually 13mm per side as the 94-95s Increase the Track Width by 5mm and then another 8mm with 96-04s, but since you are going with a 3" wider Rear Track you can use the extra up front.
Oh great. How come I haven't heard this before?? I think I will still be OK. I will get the left side on Saturday and I will mount the wheels and hang the fenders and see where they are at. If it looks bad I will switch to the 94-95's. I have both, so we will see what happens. Thanks.........
Shakerhood
Dirt-Old 20+Year Member
Oh great. How come I haven't heard this before?? I think I will still be OK. I will get the left side on Saturday and I will mount the wheels and hang the fenders and see where they are at. If it looks bad I will switch to the 94-95's. I have both, so we will see what happens. Thanks.........
Thats my bad as my Post was probably not clear enough, the 96-04s will be 13mm Wider than "Stock" per side. The 94-95s are 5mm Wider Per Side and the 96-04s are 8mm Wider than the 94-95s.
Corrent, the dimensions that they increase are not correct
BOTH will increase your track...94-95 about 5mm and 96+ about 13mm total over the fox spindle
the 96+ offers better geometry and bumpsteer prevention.
Performancewise 96+ > 94-95...but then there is the whole offset issue.
Aftermarket wheels usually negate this, but with Ford 8 and 9" wheels, 94-95 is preferred.
Why most people haven't heard this is because Mustang myths spread like wildfire.
Similar threads
