Best And Worst Used Cars

Pearl02

Member
Nov 27, 2004
496
0
16
Kansas City
I just read a article on Yahoo about the best and worst used cars to buy. the survey was done between 98 up to 2007 used cars. No ford vehicles was on any list. I guess that's good. Chevy,GM and Pontiac had alot of vehicles that made the worst list. Poor GM. Pearl02.
 
  • Sponsors (?)


I thought I remembered the Mustang making the list a couple of years ago.

EDIT: for best, not worst :)

I am not surprised... The mustang is very reliable for what it is.. another ford to look at for relability is the fusion, We have sold a ton of these things and have a bunch of them in our rental fleet and have not had any issues with them..

In two years that the fusion has been out i can count the amount of cars that came into my dealer for non maintence work on one hand...

one of them was mine ( creaking noise from passenger seat) and another one had a module problem.. I am sure some other came in that I did not see or came in on my off days but thats still impressive

Only issues I have seen with the 2005+ mustang is SJB ( smart junction box) issues and some cars with a knocking noise in the right front

BTW our warranty work at my dealer are down 80+ percent since 2000 some of that is that ford is selling fewer cars and trucks but much of that is a big drop in warranty claims per unit.

two fords i would stay away or have checked out really well are...

1. Windstars... Stay AWAY far AWAY, many problems, the P/S pump and rack fail on just about all of them, electrical problems and the earlier models 95-98 had head gasket issue, transmission issues on 95-2001

2. 02-04 explorer... Rear wheel bearings fail often, rear springs break.. Also front wheel bearings fail quite a bit, transmission issues, rear axle seals, 4x4 control module issues.. really poor e-brake design that is prone to failure and expensive repairs. New explorers are fine but these three model years have had some problems..
 
1. Windstars... Stay AWAY far AWAY, many problems, the P/S pump and rack fail on just about all of them, electrical problems and the earlier models 95-98 had head gasket issue, transmission issues on 95-2001

2. 02-04 explorer... Rear wheel bearings fail often, rear springs break.. Also front wheel bearings fail quite a bit, transmission issues, rear axle seals, 4x4 control module issues.. really poor e-brake design that is prone to failure and expensive repairs. New explorers are fine but these three model years have had some problems..
Ouch. Now these are the reasons why people make up ugly acronyms for Ford.
 
Older Explorers seem to be tanks.

Specifically the OHV 4.0's backed by the 4 speed auto. Not as smooth as the SOHC 4.0, but it has more down low grunt thanks to being a pushrod motor.

The SOHC 4.0's had that nasty timing chain tensioner issue, and those 5 speeds seemed more problematic than the 4 speed prior to them.
 
Ouch. Now these are the reasons why people make up ugly acronyms for Ford.

true.. but all makes have good and bad models..

Other than the transmission issues with the 02-04 explorer the other stuff is somewhat minor.. Now the windbag thats just a hunk of trash..

Older Explorers seem to be tanks.

Specifically the OHV 4.0's backed by the 4 speed auto. Not as smooth as the SOHC 4.0, but it has more down low grunt thanks to being a pushrod motor.

The SOHC 4.0's had that nasty timing chain tensioner issue, and those 5 speeds seemed more problematic than the 4 speed prior to them.

they fixed the timming chain tensioner issues in 2001 the newer models have a redeigned chain guide and tensioner and I have not seen any fail. The 4.0's in general will run forever if they are not run out of oil..

the 5r55's have had quite a few issues (except for the s197 mustangs they seem to be fine in that car) but it has been replaced now by a totaly different 6 speed auto ( in explorers) that seems good so far..

BTW a new series of 6 speed transmissions for the rest of the trucks ( including superduty) will be out next year..
 
true.. but all makes have good and bad models..

Other than the transmission issues with the 02-04 explorer the other stuff is somewhat minor.. Now the windbag thats just a hunk of trash..



they fixed the timming chain tensioner issues in 2001 the newer models have a redeigned chain guide and tensioner and I have not seen any fail. The 4.0's in general will run forever if they are not run out of oil..

the 5r55's have had quite a few issues (except for the s197 mustangs they seem to be fine in that car) but it has been replaced now by a totaly different 6 speed auto ( in explorers) that seems good so far..

BTW a new series of 6 speed transmissions for the rest of the trucks ( including superduty) will be out next year..



Windbag...:rlaugh:



Thats good to know they fixed the timing chain issue in 07. We had a 97, but it got fixed a few years back.

It also had an issue with the tranny, but I cant remember exaclty what it was off the top of my head. All I remember about it is the dealer pulled the engine to fix it.

6 speed auto will be sweet.
 
I'm surprised the list wasn't made up entirely of Chryslers. My wife had a 99 concorde for about a year, then I noticed some white smoke coming out of the tailpipe. Then the oil started to get nice and milky. SOOOO I traded that piece in for a 98 mustang gt. Seems like every chrysler I've seen since then has had the same white smoke coming from their exhaust. Really wouldn't surprise me if it was a company wide problem....if Daimler's German engineers can't manage to make Chrysler vehicles work better, then Chrysler is F-U-C-T.