raverjames
New Member
I would be interested in having you state your "facts" as to why Ford specifies 5W-30 oil for the V6 and 5W-20 oil for the GT. So far you have said nothing other than you think my statement is the silliest thing you ever heard, but have not said anything as to why you think it is silly. Educate me.
Maybe my statement has something to do with lighter weight oil flowing through the oil galleries faster and providing improved cooling that is better for the GT engine. Maybe my statement has something to do with reduced friction that is better for the GT engine. Maybe my statement has something to do with less stress on the GT's oil pump. Or maybe Ford just wants its dealers to stock different weight oils for the Mustang V6 and GT so as to make life more difficult for the parts and service departments.
Your turn.
OK, well I might not know anything about this subject, as I only research and write operational guidelines for engines. You first need to look at this from a manufacturers perspective. The lubrication specs are always determined based on a worst case scenario. You tell the customer to use an oil the will be ok in the most extreme cold and hot situation. However, you must assume the customer is also using the worst oil available. Manufacturers really care about only a few things when choosing a oil weight for an engine.
Engine life - This is usually measured by hrs when testing an engine. Generally 2000 hrs is a nice target when cycling loads. Motorcraft 5w-20 in the mustang is a synthetic blend. Mobil1 is a full synthetic (well sort of). The density between 5w-20 and 5w-30 is exactly the same (around 0.80 kg/l). So, there is only the viscosity at operational temp to consider. The difference of viscosity at operational temperature will be about 14 cST, as SAE 20 is about 50 cST and SAE 30 is around 64 cST. That viscosity will place very little load difference on the oil pump, since the density is the same. This will place a little added load on the CR, crank, and other components, but this load is similar to running the engine at 38 C operational temp versus 40 C. This will cause no damage to the parts. At cold start up, both oils will flow to the bearings in exactly the same way, since the both have the 5w rating. The higher viscosity oil will remain on the bearing for a longer time, causing better lubrication and extended bearing life. However, this is a comparison using decent oils. The SAE 20 and 30 ratings have a decent allowable range. Viscosity differences can go from 10 cST to 20+ cST. Use a decent name brand oil, and there should be no issue. Interesting fact: The most damaging operation in the life of an engine is not full load. Cold start-up provides some of the worst situations for an engine, as the oil takes longer to reach all the internal areas of the engine. Both 5w-30 and 5w-20 are the same on cold start-up.
Engine Performance (HP/TQ) - Here is a place where your viscosity differences affect you. That 14 cST difference could mean a couple % difference in engine output. It will not look as good advertising 295hp vs. 300hp. So, usually engine manufacturers look for the lightest viscosity oil in order to give the least amount of stress on engine internals. This will allow more efficient output from combustion. Ford most likely found that the engine bearings and components would last the full 2000 hr test using 5w-20 oil, and that will give much better power output than using the SAE 30 oil. In a muscle/performance car, the added hp and tq is a major selling point.
Engine Efficiency (BSFC or MPG on road) - The fuel consumption of an engine can be effected by even slight viscosity differences. As your oil gets older, it also gets dirtier. This increases viscosity and explains why you get more mpg when the oil is clean. The SAE 20 and SAE 30 also give different fuel consumption results. When I was with Fiat, we were testing 15w-50 vs 10w-30 in an endurance test. The SAE 50 oil actually raised our BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) by 5%. That is a big difference. With the Ford V8 already being slightly fuel hungry, dropping the mpg rating to 22mpg highway would not look good. Obviously there are ways to change this with gear ratios and other components of the car, but they are not on an unlimited development budget. Best solution is to get the most out of the engine with your current design.
So, as a summary, you can use 5w-30 oil, but it will not be suggested as it hurts the engine efficiency. It will not destroy your engine, but it will make you burn more gas and result in less power.
Is there a reason to use 5w-30 over the 5w-20? Not really unless you fear your bearings are getting old and worn. The added viscosity will give them a little added life, but you may not even notice.
Is there a reason to use mobil1 5w-30 over motorcraft blended 5w-20? Sure. The full syn will take longer to break down and give proper lubrication for an extended period of time. If you are going to change the oil at 7500 miles anyway, don't bother with the full syn.
Motorcraft does not post statistics on their lubricants, so I was not be able to directly compare. I am not an *******, and I hope I don't sound like one. I have spent a few years in engine development and I get a little frustrated at the comments I hear from people. There were no facts given in any of the previous posts about reasons to use one oil rating over another. Art, even you gave little to no facts to back up what you wrote. I hope I can provide more help on this forum than just function as someone who argues with people. I will share my knowledge of engines and combustion and you guys can share your knowledge of performance parts and resources. Deal?