Im seeing a lot of good deals on these cars .. Sometimes they are less than a regular GT .. Is the performance really any better than a regular GT or Bullitt?? 
Shelby GT
- Thread starter snaggeltooth
- Start date
-
Sponsors (?)
They have a few more horse power, better suspension. List price was about $8,500 or so more than a regular GT. They may be collector's cars in the distant future since they were modified in Shelby's factory in Las Vegas.
There may have been a few problems in the beginning but Shelby has worked them out. Shelby Automotive Industries (SAI) has been standing behind their product and working with the owners to have their problems corrected under the 3 Year Warranty. I am sure you can find fault with any of the other manufactures such as Saleen and Roush if you want to get picky.
The basic Shelby GT (SGT) is advertised at 330 HP. You have the option of having your car upgraded with various Superchargers that range from approx. 400 HP to 550 HP. So HP is not really a problem if you want to upgrade. (Not much different than the Saleen or Roush)
The suspension is great and the ride is very comfortable.
Yes, The SGT is a basic cosmetic change with a handling package change unless you upgrade to a SC. But isn't that what most of the cars are such as Saleen, Roush and the GT500 (Larger motor with a few cosmetic changes).
I would recommend, if you're in the market, to select the car that most closely fits your desire and not worry who built it. Most of us will not own the car by the time it is worth anything (if any) in the future.
The basic Shelby GT (SGT) is advertised at 330 HP. You have the option of having your car upgraded with various Superchargers that range from approx. 400 HP to 550 HP. So HP is not really a problem if you want to upgrade. (Not much different than the Saleen or Roush)
The suspension is great and the ride is very comfortable.
Yes, The SGT is a basic cosmetic change with a handling package change unless you upgrade to a SC. But isn't that what most of the cars are such as Saleen, Roush and the GT500 (Larger motor with a few cosmetic changes).
I would recommend, if you're in the market, to select the car that most closely fits your desire and not worry who built it. Most of us will not own the car by the time it is worth anything (if any) in the future.
Not looking to buy it for future possible wealth , it will be driven alot .. I was just wondering if it is that much better than a stock GT ... It seems it comes with most of the stuff I would do to one.. and I would not want to give it a S/C just your basic bolt ons and suspension mods ..
My Honest Opinion:
The Shelby GT (SGT) has a much better suspension and handling package than the standard GT. The suspension and the name is what you are really paying for with this car. My only improvement would be a WATTS Panhard. This car drives as if it is on rails around corners. Solid feel.
The SGT and the GT will could both use a better set of brakes if you are considering doing any sort of SCCA track racing.
Both could use more power, but that is easily resolved.
I love the feel of the Hurst short throw shifter that they have installed in the SGT.
Over all, I would own a Shelby, Saleen or Roush before a GT anyday.
The choice is yours. Do your research and select the car that best suits your needs and pocket book.
The Shelby GT (SGT) has a much better suspension and handling package than the standard GT. The suspension and the name is what you are really paying for with this car. My only improvement would be a WATTS Panhard. This car drives as if it is on rails around corners. Solid feel.
The SGT and the GT will could both use a better set of brakes if you are considering doing any sort of SCCA track racing.
Both could use more power, but that is easily resolved.
I love the feel of the Hurst short throw shifter that they have installed in the SGT.
Over all, I would own a Shelby, Saleen or Roush before a GT anyday.
The choice is yours. Do your research and select the car that best suits your needs and pocket book.
GreyDiesel
New Member
If you can find one in the same condition as a GT, its probably a good deal. I would guess the ones going for less than a GT are in bad shape somehow. The SGT, as I understand, comes with the FRPP handling pack ($1400), Hurst Shifter ($200), Shelby Grill ($300), Le Mans Stripes ($400?), CAI and tune ($700), Borla Muffs ($300?).. and I am sure there are some other things that I cant think of right now. It was a good car. I would buy one over a regular GT if they are the same or comparable price. You can buy a GT and all the parts, put them on yourself... but you dont get the Shelby name, and it might take a while to get all the parts on the car.
I have had my GT for about a year now, and am just now getting into Shelby GT type of performance. However... I have modded slow because I spent as much as I could on the car itself at the original purchase. If I were to do it again, I would buy a cheaper car, and then immidietly spend 2-3k on bolt ons.
I have had my GT for about a year now, and am just now getting into Shelby GT type of performance. However... I have modded slow because I spent as much as I could on the car itself at the original purchase. If I were to do it again, I would buy a cheaper car, and then immidietly spend 2-3k on bolt ons.
stangdude2000
Founding Member
If you don't care about handling, you'll outperform the Shelby GT with an aftermarket CAI and Tune. Their tune is mild, bringing the advertised HP to 315, whereas most people claim a more aggressive aftermarket tune will bring in more horsepower than that.
GreyDiesel had a pretty comprehensive list of changes. The only other things I can think of (besides the Shelby badging/signed dash plaque) are the California Special front/rear bumpers and side scoops. I think they MIGHT have included a strut tower brace as well.
If it is the same price as a GT in the same condition, I see no reason not to purchase it. Unless you are after the better styling (in my opinion) and prestige, or are planning on doing minor handling modifications anyway, I wouldn't spend more than an extra $1k over an equivalent GT.
GreyDiesel had a pretty comprehensive list of changes. The only other things I can think of (besides the Shelby badging/signed dash plaque) are the California Special front/rear bumpers and side scoops. I think they MIGHT have included a strut tower brace as well.
If it is the same price as a GT in the same condition, I see no reason not to purchase it. Unless you are after the better styling (in my opinion) and prestige, or are planning on doing minor handling modifications anyway, I wouldn't spend more than an extra $1k over an equivalent GT.
GreyDiesel
New Member
okay, weird.
I just did a search on kbb.com for the suggested retail values, and they came out like this:
2008 Mustang GT Premium, 8k miles = 28,300
2008 Mustang GT Shelby, 8k miles = 27,500
2008 Mustang GT Bullitt, 8k miles = 26,500
Why on earth would a Bullitt be cheaper than a GT? Why would a Shelby be cheaper than a GT?
I dont know. The only thing I can figure is that people in the used car market dont know about the Bullitts and the Shelbys, so they arent buying them. Anyway... yes, get that Shelby. Its effing awesome.
You might could rangle a new 2010 for 27k.. but I'd rather have the 08 Shelby.
I just did a search on kbb.com for the suggested retail values, and they came out like this:
2008 Mustang GT Premium, 8k miles = 28,300
2008 Mustang GT Shelby, 8k miles = 27,500
2008 Mustang GT Bullitt, 8k miles = 26,500
Why on earth would a Bullitt be cheaper than a GT? Why would a Shelby be cheaper than a GT?
I dont know. The only thing I can figure is that people in the used car market dont know about the Bullitts and the Shelbys, so they arent buying them. Anyway... yes, get that Shelby. Its effing awesome.
You might could rangle a new 2010 for 27k.. but I'd rather have the 08 Shelby.
I think all of those values are high considering Ford is offering a $4500 rebate on a new 2009. And you can bet there are dealers out there who still have them willing to do almost anything to get rid of the 2009s.
The Shelby and Bullitt should be valued at more than a GT. Makes no sense that they would be less.
The Shelby and Bullitt should be valued at more than a GT. Makes no sense that they would be less.
I just checked NADA, which I think is always a bit high. Full retail for a 2008 GT premium is $23,625. Average trade-in is $18,375. Retail for a 2008 Bullitt is $26,625. Retail for a Shelby GT is $35,250. Retail for a 2008 Shelby GT 500 is $41,755.
I know of a dealer who had a new 2008 Shelby GT for $34,000. I also know of a man who bought a 2008 GT 500 with 3,000 miles for $34,000.
So, who knows what they are worth.
I am always told me who ask me about prices for old Mustangs, it is worth what you can get somebody to pay you.
I know of a dealer who had a new 2008 Shelby GT for $34,000. I also know of a man who bought a 2008 GT 500 with 3,000 miles for $34,000.
So, who knows what they are worth.
I am always told me who ask me about prices for old Mustangs, it is worth what you can get somebody to pay you.
It is difficult to place value on today's products with today's economy. Car's are a very unpredictable market at best. Yes, a cars value is only as good as what someone is willing to pay. Just watch a Barret & Jackson auction some evening to prove this point.
Just a few years ago, 1969 Shelby GT500's were selling at record levels (as high as $300K in some cases) (Check out Mike's Classic cars in Blair, Nebraska). Today those values have dropped to below $200K.
In the late 70's and early 80's you could purchase a 69 Mach I for around $1500 to $2000 . Today you could not even get one in that condition for under $20,000. In some cases these cars are over $40K.
My point is that the value of a car will deminish for several years (Up to 20+) before you could even think of it appreciating in value. Even then it will be the rare limited production cars that will bring top dollar. If you don't believe this, then look up a 1965 Shelby GT 350. Not much different from the regular 1965 Mustang GT just like today's comparison of a Mustang GT and a Shelby GT.
If I were to invest in one of these cars...my money would be on the Shelby any time. If you want something today to get more power and performance for the dollar, then go with the GT.
Just a few years ago, 1969 Shelby GT500's were selling at record levels (as high as $300K in some cases) (Check out Mike's Classic cars in Blair, Nebraska). Today those values have dropped to below $200K.
In the late 70's and early 80's you could purchase a 69 Mach I for around $1500 to $2000 . Today you could not even get one in that condition for under $20,000. In some cases these cars are over $40K.
My point is that the value of a car will deminish for several years (Up to 20+) before you could even think of it appreciating in value. Even then it will be the rare limited production cars that will bring top dollar. If you don't believe this, then look up a 1965 Shelby GT 350. Not much different from the regular 1965 Mustang GT just like today's comparison of a Mustang GT and a Shelby GT.
If I were to invest in one of these cars...my money would be on the Shelby any time. If you want something today to get more power and performance for the dollar, then go with the GT.
loud800
New Member
40th GT
New Member
I wish my dealer was that generous when I bought my leftover 2008 this past June. They wouldn't go any lower than $28k OTD.
walter
Founding Member
I hear those are the cars to have on some SCCA Autocross classes. SCCA Scrutineers consider those stock cars but clearly are not compared to the GT.
Nice cars if the price is right go for one.
Nice cars if the price is right go for one.
Similar threads
