Top Speed
New Member
I disagree, I ve seen plenty in person and think the cars just amazing !!
Clearly you've never seen one parked next to any other generation of Camaro...
I disagree, I ve seen plenty in person and think the cars just amazing !!
Clearly you've never seen one parked next to any other generation of Camaro...
Or maybe a Mustang
Just goes to show we all have different opinions. For me, the 4th gen Camaro is one of the ugliest cars made. The 5th gen Camaro while not perfect looks great to me. The 2010 Mustang looks great except for the rear. I just don't see how Ford did such a good job on the rest of the car and than stopped at the rear.
Well, I don't wanna bash on the guy's new ride, because it's a nice car if it's your thing, but personally, I don't like it, and I share your opinion on how they're photogenic, but other than that...meh.
I was just at one of our Camaro club meets last weekend and one of our members has a new 5th Gen. We all had our 4th Gens backed into spaces, and right smack in the middle was the 5th Gen, and it was riding high...literally.
As I stood there looking at the 5th sitting next to the 4ths, I couldn't help but think to myself how ridiculous the 5th Gen looked amongst the 4ths; a lack of style, shape, aerodynamics, and it looked just plain clumsy. IMO, the Camaro is one of those cars that looks good as long as there isn't anything else with the slightest hint of style parked near it.
Clearly you've never seen one parked next to any other generation of Camaro...
Lol guys you can bash all you want! In the end I'm a Mustang guy who switched to a new Camaro and then posted about it on a Mustang forum...Who wouldn't expect a little bashing?! hahahaha It's all good I'm secure enough in myself to take it...In the end this is America and we have freedom of speech and if you really think about it competition and things you hate (the Camaro hahahaha) unite the Mustang guys, otherwise we might run out of things to talk about eventually and start hating on each other
For me, this car is amazing! I've never driven a faster car and believe me I had a major concern about the weight (I went from an '05 Mustang to this...big weight difference)...But the first time I drove it my concerns about weight were put to rest by the engine when I tried my first 0-60 run (although the Mustang has better exhaust feedback [i.e. sweet! lol])...For me, it gets my adrenaline running and it's enjoyable and that's all I can really ask for and want out of my car until I go off into the Air Force...I wanted something I could enjoy for a while because I don't know if I'll be able to take it with me if I get stationed overseas, so this car has done that for me so far!
And like I already said...I'm already considering buying a Mustang too - so take that in to consideration before too much bashing! Ha I wonder how bad my insurance would stick it to me being 21, unmarried, and with 2 400+ horsepower cars (assuming the coyote engine comes next year...hopefully! ) hahaha...Then again I might just buy an older GT or GT500...Something in me just likes variety
Actually I have...and still would chose the 5th gen everytime......remeber its an opinion, and it seems when differed with yours......you just cant stand it, or you wouldnt respond negativly to every positive 5th gen camaro post.....
You not liking the 5th gen is fine with me.....wont change my mind about owning one....as far as the Sn-95 stangs I really liked them, more a fan of the old 60s models but I think besides the Mustang IIs, the Mustangs have always had great styling.
So what do you do that you're 21 years old and can afford to buy $60,000 worth of cars? I'd really like to know, because I'm in the wrong field.
Wow! You are SO right! Have no fear. I think the 1998-2002 Camaro's styling sucks, too. What's it like to drive a car that looks like a catfish?
I have to disagree the 93-97 Camaro's are by far worse than the 5th gen IMO there probably the worst Camaro ever made. But when you talk about the 98-02, now that's a car. Allthough I would prefer a 02 ws6 over the Camaro any day.
Now that right there is just plain...FUNNY! You're the first person I've ever talked to that doesn't like the 1993-1997 style better than the 1998-2002, but, to each his/her own. I mean, besides the 5th Gens, I would have marked the 1974 Z28 as the ugliest Camaros ever built, but that's me.
As for the 1993-1997, why are they the worst ever made? The styling? Performance? What? Or are you just mad because they're nearly just as fast as a stock 2009 Mustang GT and they're 12 years older at the very least?
Actually, Pontiac has been "in it." In fact, they sold DOUBLE the amount of vehicles that Buick had sold in 2008, with the G8 heading the pack. The G8 sold better than Pontiac's "bread and butter" G6!
And gee, then Fritz Henderson says, "There's currently no place for a G8 in GM's line-up," and that was AFTER Bob Lutz said that the G8 was "too good to waste." Bob Lutz had to retract his comments.
So, let's see; no room for a full-sized car with 361 hp that can be scored for $30,000, has decent build quality, great styling (IMO), and performance that rivals that of a 2005 BMW M5? Help me out, because maybe I'm missing something.
Because IMO they are just plain ugly , it has nothing to do with power. I dont buy my car's based on that, you can make anything fast. I wont say your wrong, but I dont see many of those year's on the road, so that must mean something . Any how I'm not bashing your's, or your choice, I just dont care for them.
Just because they sold more than Buick does'nt mean anything considering they have'nt sold any Buick's, it's not real hard to do.
I agree the G8 is a great car I kind of miss mine. The only thing it is lacking are the option's and the interior could have been a bit more interesting.
Now that right there is just plain...FUNNY! You're the first person I've ever talked to that doesn't like the 1993-1997 style better than the 1998-2002, but, to each his/her own. I mean, besides the 5th Gens, I would have marked the 1974 Z28 as the ugliest Camaros ever built, but that's me.
As for the 1993-1997, why are they the worst ever made? The styling? Performance? What? Or are you just mad because they're nearly just as fast as a stock 2009 Mustang GT and they're 12 years older at the very least?
Sure if you can even find one they only ended up making like 2 or 3 thousand of the GXP's if I remember right.
So what do you do that you're 21 years old and can afford to buy $60,000 worth of cars? I'd really like to know, because I'm in the wrong field.
There's one that sits on a showroom floor 20 miles up the road from me; a red one with an auto.