Prove my friend wrong stangnet

fromadig91

Member
Jul 27, 2008
95
0
6
My buddy has a completely stock 2002 GT and is swapping the catback exhaust, he just ordered some stingers or Magnaflow catbacks, not sure which. He is insisting that he has to cut up the exhaust to take it off. I refuse to beleive this and haven't had the time to go over and look at it myself personally. Dam near everyone on stangnet has to have done this. Can I please get some feedback from some people who have done it first hand? Thanks again Stangnet:flag:
 
  • Sponsors (?)


uh... its been a while, but I'm pretty sure you do. At least that's how it was done on my car. Only other way would be to drop the axle from the car.

Why not cut it out when your replacing it anyway? It's the easiest way.
 
My buddy has a completely stock 2002 GT and is swapping the catback exhaust, he just ordered some stingers or Magnaflow catbacks, not sure which. He is insisting that he has to cut up the exhaust to take it off. I refuse to beleive this and haven't had the time to go over and look at it myself personally. Dam near everyone on stangnet has to have done this. Can I please get some feedback from some people who have done it first hand? Thanks again Stangnet:flag:
The bet involves if the stock exhaust HAS to be cut off (not if it is easier). The Ford service manual calls for the STOCK exhaust to be removed without cutting. It is done by disconnecting the upper arm-to-differential bolts and shocks. This allows the rear end to hang down low enough to remove the stock exhaust without cutting (the rear end does not have to be removed).

My vote is fromadig91 is correct.

However, I agree it is easier to cut it. Removing the top arm-to-differential bolts is a PIA.
 
The bet involves if the stock exhaust HAS to be cut off (not if it is easier). The Ford service manual calls for the STOCK exhaust to be removed without cutting. It is done by disconnecting the upper arm-to-differential bolts and shocks. This allows the rear end to hang down low enough to remove the stock exhaust without cutting (the rear end does not have to be removed).

My vote is fromadig91 is correct.

However, I agree it is easier to cut it. Removing the top arm-to-differential bolts is a PIA.

Yeah... it is POSSIBLE to do it without cutting, but its also pointless. Doing all that to the rear end is just about as bad as actually removing it. To get it off the car after all that is only another 6 bolts.
 
Thanks Stangnet :flag: topnotch advice like always. One more question, So say he does decide to just chop it, the aftermarket catback can sneak on up there and be clamped or welded (welded preferred IMO)? From my understanding you chop it so you don't have to go through the hassle of having to drop the back end, but are you gonna have to drop it anyways to put the new stuff on? For whats its worth it is a whole catback system, not just mufflers.
 
The new one will go up with the rear in place because it is in sections and clamps together once in place.

I wouldn't weld it if it were my car becasue then you can't adjust it or remove it easily in the future. Just be sure to use some Loctite on the threads so they dont back out.
 
the stock pipes can be removed by unbolting the shock at the axle and removeing the upper control arm bolt at the axle. one side at a time and lower that side. did it on my 04 mach on my back an with bolting the new slp's on it took 45min-1hr. i also have a useless uncut catback in my shed going on 5 years now.
 
The stock exhaust can be removed without cutting it off on jack stands in ones garage. I know b/c I did it. I didn't use any super high jack stands, just your standard car jack stands found at Sears. I did have to lower my rear axle, but it isn't that hard, a few bolts, two more jack stands and a floor jack. I kept mine in case I ever needed to reinstall them (to sell the car, emissions, trouble with cops, new exhaust becomes damaged). With all that said, it would have been easier to cut them and remove them.