Explain?most people who can work on cars know that spending 10k extra for 4k in "add on go fast parts" is dumb
Explain?most people who can work on cars know that spending 10k extra for 4k in "add on go fast parts" is dumb
Oh, I didn't take your comment that way. Mainly referring to srtthis's comment about termi owners. Although I know that comment doesn't represent the majority.NOT the point i was trying to make...
I wasn't referring to you, just accrediting you for making the statement. I’m making a generalized comment on those who would automatically assume that a person who chooses to buy a newer, or better car from the get go hasn't the same automotive skills, or desire as the one who would buy a 20-year-old Fox body, Making a judgement of someones ability or commitment to the hobby because they chose something that won’t require $10,000 worth of work to perform on par with the newer car in the first place is just silly.
It ALWAYS makes more sense to start with the best starting point you can afford. If someone chooses to do otherwise, they're making a decision based on other, less rational reasons.
I CHOSE my fox because of nostalgia, initial low cost purchase price and simplicity reasons. Not because it made the most sense to buy, was the better starting point, or qualifies me as more of a "car guy". I'll be the first (and by the looks of it the only) to admit that.
Explain?
Guys who would rather buy than build aren't really car people... They're boys with toys.
if you want a car that goes fast that you are not going to have to turn wrenches on for whatever reason your going to pay for it. look at the price difference between the GT and roush for example. what is it?.. roughly 15k more (probably more). you don't think you can make a GT out perform a roush for 15k?
if you want a car that goes fast that you are not going to have to turn wrenches on for whatever reason your going to pay for it. look at the price difference between the GT and roush for example. what is it?.. roughly 15k more (probably more). you don't think you can make a GT out perform a roush for 15k?
$15k to make a GT outperform a Roush? Turbo kit and a full suspension kit. Done.
Try it. I'd love to see you post your parts list dollar by dollar.no i am under the impression that you could build something you want for less you could even use exact same parts they used if you wanted
Show me...using all the same parts as the factory....just like you stated.its already been done.
...and what do you think that's going to run you Hoopty?
Sit down and really do the math...and you'll see, you're not going to come up very short of that figure when all is said and done. And in the end....you still haven't copied the Roush looks, sound, or style. Not to mention it's limited production run.
I'm not saying $15K is a bargain for what you get....but you aren't going to truly duplicate the car as a whole for any less. Not with new parts anyway. You'll likely pay a fair bit more in the end.
I think he mentioned Roush's performance, not buying a Roush for a Roush. I see a difference there. What did, say an '04 mustang GT sell for?
I will agree with your stance when he mentioned building the same car as them with the same parts for less. Not a snowball's chance in hell...
I agree. If fucntion is your goal, then you will successfully reach it and still come away spending less money in the end.I do think that with the $15 difference (if indeed that is what it is) you could buy a complete turbo and suspension kit and make it outperform a Roush. Will it have the same looks and sound? Hell no, but it depends on if you are more interested in form or function. I'm more for function
The DMV said my 03 stickered for like $28k when I registered it last year. I much prefer to build than buy. I don't think I'd be as happy with my cars lowered look if I hadn't spent a day changing the springs/shocks/struts. Made it more satisfying. And its hard to beat the rush you get when removing front springs "kamikaze" style.
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G