Search results

Guys, I'm not buying the 2005 Mustang unless it has air brakes, tandem rear axle (with independent suspension), at least 1000 horsepower (rear wheel, not crank), a handy dash-mounted fuel filler, and headlights that change color with the dash lights. Geez, you can't please anyone these days...

Yeah, I see your point. I'm sure with the GT being ~300hp they also wouldn't want to compromise their GT sales to the V6 if the hp difference becomes too small. It's likely the profit margin on the GT is much higher. Just the same, I'd like to think even in the base model that I could...

I'm with you bhuff30, the engine should be a decent one. Not much talk about it on the forum though. Too many guys wining about "only" 300hp on the V-8. I hate to say it, but the Mustang power characteristics will always be determined by what the market dictates for the primary application for...

What a ridiculous thread.... Yeah, I'm sure there's a way for Ford to engineer a rear fill for nostalgia's sake. But, if they are smart (and they are), they would cerrtainly not waste engineering manpower on non-saleable (and perhaps risky) features. Would they sell more cars with a rear...

I would definitely get a targa top or T-top even if it were an extra couple thou. Screw body rigidity. I don't plan on racing on the Nacar circuit. Besides, the new chassis has a bazillion-load more rigidity than the old one, and I never had a problem with the old one. I'd be willing to be 99%...

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m3MKT/171_109/78271023/p1/article.jhtml?term= The above link is related to Ford's engine strategy, It is two years old, so things are likely farther along now. I had been recently speculating that Ford may not get rid of the 4.0L SOHC engine. Looks like...