78Mach1
Founding Member
/FLAME SUIT ON/
This coming from two owners of the car bearing by far the least resemblance to any mustang ever produced before or after it
Where are the side scallops , the pony in the grill , oh wait even Ford had to be embarrassed to call the foxes a mustang when they only got a Ford Blue Oval up front.
How can a "mustang" be taken seriously when it can be mistaken for an Escort GT???
/Takes Off Flame Suit/
Serioulsy I personlly think the Foxes are the ugliest Mustangs made, but don't make a habit of trashing someone elses ride simply because I don't like the body style. If someone puts the effort into making the car look as good as the day it cme off the line you have to give them the credit they deserve.
no leave the 70s out of it cuz the 69s and 70s were bad ass, but 71-73 werent that bad.....the reason i say that is my dad had a really nice 71 boss 351 back in the day....but the 74-78s are the ugliest ever
This coming from two owners of the car bearing by far the least resemblance to any mustang ever produced before or after it
Where are the side scallops , the pony in the grill , oh wait even Ford had to be embarrassed to call the foxes a mustang when they only got a Ford Blue Oval up front.
How can a "mustang" be taken seriously when it can be mistaken for an Escort GT???
/Takes Off Flame Suit/
Serioulsy I personlly think the Foxes are the ugliest Mustangs made, but don't make a habit of trashing someone elses ride simply because I don't like the body style. If someone puts the effort into making the car look as good as the day it cme off the line you have to give them the credit they deserve.