-
Sponsors (?)
slayerripkdc
15 Year Member
streethorse
15 Year Member
I want to see the v6 with 4.10's, mid pipe and tune
410's on a six speed..... sounds like a lot of shifting.
Night Shifter
Well-Known Member
lol at the douche canoe driving the GT.. you can tell he thinks he is a badass just because he's beating a chic in a v6
scupking
Active Member
I want to see the v6 with 4.10's, mid pipe and tune
I would say 3.73s and 93 Oct tune. I think 4.10s would be to much on the 6 seepd. With 3.73s and 93 oct tune the V6 would beat out a stock 2010 GT.
I ROFLd
That is pretty damn close for it bein a V6, i cant believe like what someone else said, a few bolt ons and the v6 would be in the money.
That is pretty damn close for it bein a V6, i cant believe like what someone else said, a few bolt ons and the v6 would be in the money.
I was really disappointed with the vid. This means that a bone stock V6 Mustang is going to be able to hang with our 2V GT's.
This is a sad day for me (and my 2V)
get a supercharger and wipe some grins off those 05s+ its priceless to see the "wtf" effect when i put on a train length on them , that never gets old
tank_567
Active Member
get a supercharger and wipe some grins off those 05s+ its priceless to see the "wtf" effect when i put on a train length on them , that never gets old
or turbo
scupking
Active Member
Its funny that this V6 makes as much HP as the 2003-2004 Mach 1s. Granted the Mach 1 has 40 more lbs of tq at the crank (320 vs 280). Though I think the 2011 V6 weighs a little less then the 03-04 mach 1s so it might be a close race stock vs stock.
This is the situation with all cars, not just mustangs. Cars have really come a long way in the last 10 years.
Very cool, but I think stats are a little off. The difference in the price of the two may have been $4,700 when both were brand new, but the 2010 GT is now a year old and dealerships are putting out some really nice incentives on the 2010 GT’s to clear the lost for the 2011’s. I’d bet when all is said and done, you’ll walk off the lot with a 2010 GT for the same price, if not less than you will a similarly equipped 2011 V6.
Also, I’ve not spoke with one guy over in the S197 section that isn’t banging down at least 27mpg+ in their ’05-’10 GT’s. Some of them are even getting close to 30mpg with a ginger right foot. Still, I’m sure the new V6 will get better mileage as a whole, but I’m betting the difference won’t be 7mpg like the poster of this video states.
Hang with the 2V's??? I just hung with the 3V. I've got a feeling if it ever came down to it, a 2V GT would be VERY, VERY lucky to hang with the 2011 V6, not the other way around.
Also, I’ve not spoke with one guy over in the S197 section that isn’t banging down at least 27mpg+ in their ’05-’10 GT’s. Some of them are even getting close to 30mpg with a ginger right foot. Still, I’m sure the new V6 will get better mileage as a whole, but I’m betting the difference won’t be 7mpg like the poster of this video states.
I was really disappointed with the vid. This means that a bone stock V6 Mustang is going to be able to hang with our 2V GT's.
This is a sad day for me (and my 2V)
Hang with the 2V's??? I just hung with the 3V. I've got a feeling if it ever came down to it, a 2V GT would be VERY, VERY lucky to hang with the 2011 V6, not the other way around.
Thats nice, kick a man when he's down
Your car is still nice and really, really shiny.
patman0911
Founding Member
300 HP is 300HP anyway you slice it. I'm surprised it wasn't closer - the V6 must have the economy gears out back.
Similar threads
