400 Hp With A Stock Cam!

Discussion in '1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-' started by viper_dude_06, Nov 7, 2013.


  1. viper_dude_06

    viper_dude_06 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2012
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    9
    Location:
    South West, Texas
    #1
  2. NIKwoaC

    NIKwoaC 中國製造

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Messages:
    8,439
    Likes Received:
    698
    Trophy Points:
    164
    Location:
    Chengdu Province
    That article is as old as time itself… For the internet, anyway. There have been threads on top of threads of people engaged in flame wars over that article. The general conclusion that most people seem to settle on is that the fellas over at Westech were either high that day or they intentionally tweaked or cheated something to inflate the numbers. I mean, look at how they picked up nearly 55 hp over Ford’s stock ratings just by putting a carburetor on it.
    #2
  3. viper_dude_06

    viper_dude_06 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2012
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    9
    Location:
    South West, Texas
    Come to think about it, I didnt think of it like that. What you said does make sense. Ive always read that you'll get about 25-30 horses tops with a right intake and carb setup. Well it would of been nice if it really would be that easy then. Maybe ill just be optimistic and say the motor they were working on was just one of a kind and they had really good luck lol. But anyways thanks for the input.
    #3
  4. 90lxwhite

    90lxwhite Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,162
    Likes Received:
    259
    Trophy Points:
    104
    Location:
    Between the Red and Rio
    If it sounds too good to be true.....
    #4
  5. revhead347

    revhead347 I have face herpes.

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,572
    Likes Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Acworth, GA
    It's a load of crap. They dynoed 280hp on a stock engine before they did anything!

    Kurt
    #5
  6. mikestang63

    mikestang63 Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2012
    Messages:
    3,718
    Showcase:
    20
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    1,008
    Trophy Points:
    144
    Sure. They acheived what no other person I've ever seen has been able to do with that same setup. If you read it in a magazine, it has to be true, right?
    #6
  7. 1200gt

    1200gt Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 1999
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    19
    I would say that they didn't do anything to produce the claim of 278 hp with the fresh stock bottom end. - I hear of guys making it to the 40o hp + mark once they go dual plane and big carb with the right timing and jetting.

    Surely there are some of you guys out there that are carbed and can lend some truth or false to this possibility with a bit more than just shop talk.... That's all I can give, I don't have a carb setup and never have.

    It would be inspiring to know that the little caboose Ford 302 could tow the line to 400 with no juice or huff.
    #7
  8. revhead347

    revhead347 I have face herpes.

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,572
    Likes Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Acworth, GA
    Ha. You're not getting to 400hp on a 302 short of 13:1 compression and leaded gas with iron heads no matter what you do. There is no carb and intake setup in the world that is going to magically make the heads flow better.

    Kurt
    #8
  9. HotFox

    HotFox Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    39
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    You are all doubting the ads on craigslist with k&n, throttle body and exhaust making 300hp? hmmmm:shrug::scratch:
    #9
  10. A5literMan

    A5literMan Mustang Master

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,192
    Likes Received:
    301
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Illinois
    They don't??:poo:Mine probably makes 400 then because I'm running an e cam:rolleyes:
    #10
  11. Gearbanger 101

    Gearbanger 101 Straight Outta Locash Super Mod

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,186
    Likes Received:
    831
    Trophy Points:
    164
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Well....I guess if you use a 24% correction factor (accessories perhaps?), it could be pretty close.

    SAE 225bhp * 1.24 = 279hp engine dyno

    SAE 322bhp * 1.24 = 399hp engine dyno

    I suppose a stock block H/C/I 302 with full exhaust could make around 320bhp SAE with a good intake, carb, Trick Flow heads and a host of exhaust bolt ons.


    ...it doesn't sound near as cool as adding that massive correction factor and calling it 400-even though. ;)
    #11
  12. cleanLX

    cleanLX Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2001
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    29
    Models are showing 380fwhp on 306 with e7's, naturally aspirated at 10.6:1 on 91oct. It is still untuned and I'm short shifting by 2000rpm until it is tuned. It is running very strong right now. 255/60-16 dr's are not holding in 2nd or for a great deal of 3rd.
    #12
  13. revhead347

    revhead347 I have face herpes.

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,572
    Likes Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Acworth, GA
    Awesome. Let us know how it does.

    Kurt
    #13
  14. DJ89Stang

    DJ89Stang New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2013
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    2
  15. cleanLX

    cleanLX Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2001
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    29
    Most certainly.
    forgot to mention, the cam is no where near stock.
    #15

Share This Page