Ok so here's the deal. I'm normally over in the classic section but this question pertains to the 5.0L blocks so I figured I'd put it in here.
My current sitaution is that I have 2 engines (complete). One is out of a 1990 Ford crown vic (5.0L) and the other is from a 1986 Mustang (5.0L). Basically what I want to know is what parts from each are preferable as far as crank, pistons, cam etc. I need to use the crown vic block because the '86 block is cracked where the trans mates to the engine. It's not a structural crack but worries me that the tranny isn't fully bolted up.
the crown vic 5.0 I'm sure isn't an HO motor but I believe the '86 is because it has the 351w firing order which I believe only the HO 302's used as well. Either that or someone put a cam in the '86 to convert it. I was planning to use the EFI stuff from the crown vic but it appears it's pretty useless and crappy and I'll just end up converting to a mustang mass air EFI setup once I get the internals and engine actually built.
I also am curious if the blocks are identical?
Hopefully this wasn't too scatter brained.
Thanks,
Dan
My current sitaution is that I have 2 engines (complete). One is out of a 1990 Ford crown vic (5.0L) and the other is from a 1986 Mustang (5.0L). Basically what I want to know is what parts from each are preferable as far as crank, pistons, cam etc. I need to use the crown vic block because the '86 block is cracked where the trans mates to the engine. It's not a structural crack but worries me that the tranny isn't fully bolted up.
the crown vic 5.0 I'm sure isn't an HO motor but I believe the '86 is because it has the 351w firing order which I believe only the HO 302's used as well. Either that or someone put a cam in the '86 to convert it. I was planning to use the EFI stuff from the crown vic but it appears it's pretty useless and crappy and I'll just end up converting to a mustang mass air EFI setup once I get the internals and engine actually built.
I also am curious if the blocks are identical?
Hopefully this wasn't too scatter brained.
Thanks,
Dan