Battle of the BIG DOGS !!!

Discussion in '2010 - 2012 Specific Tech' started by SS02, Oct 28, 2009.

  1. SS02 New Member

    Member Since:
    May 30, 2009
    Message Count:
    427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  2. MeanMike New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Message Count:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That Challenger sure got screwed over.
  3. bluestang50 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2006
    Message Count:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yeah they shouldnt have done that comparison until the real challenger was there.
  4. Fast05 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Geee why am I not surprised...

    I love the comment that the Camaro "absolutely destroyed" the other 2 in the 1/4 mile and beat the GT500 by 1/10 of a second :rolleyes:

    All good cars, like he said at the end, too bad the SuperSnake doesn't have decent tires, pretty sure it'd be a different story if it did.
  5. nosmatt Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 14, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle :)
  6. blown65 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Message Count:
    1,925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Since ppl run low 12's in stock gt500's I wouldn't put much into the times that guy ran. Probably both the Shelby and the camaro would be faster with a different driver.

    120-121 mph and only 12 flat. That's pathetic.
  7. Fast05 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :rlaugh:

    I was just making a point. Did they even mention if the tires were changed from a stock GT500 or were they the same tires? I don't recall, but if they didn't change them that's pathetic considering the power increase....that they'd change everything but the tires. :shrug:

    Either way...go put some better tires on it.
  8. nosmatt Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 14, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was just a statement :)

    I like that one, so i finally found an oppertunity to use it.

    As for tires, if you can afford those cars, your not the type to be rollin on f'n drag radials tho, you need to run em on the tires they come with, not MM&FF style of bolting slicks on anything on the road, including a Ford GT that will likely never have drag tires on em from their owners!.. I think that is rediculous.
  9. Fast05 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Very true. I'll do it to my GT tho when I take her to the track :D
  10. bluestang50 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2006
    Message Count:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If i had that shelby i would most likely be driving around on either mickey thompson or nitto drag radials... at least i did with my 92 347 ;)
  11. Stangdriver13 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If tires are such an issue, they need to get the same tires to run on all the cars. Then go compare the cars. I read that the old supersnake ran 11.6's on dr's.
  12. exwifegotstang New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 20, 2003
    Message Count:
    115
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What would you do to the Shelby suspension if it were yours to help it grip?
  13. SS02 New Member

    Member Since:
    May 30, 2009
    Message Count:
    427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Plan and simple....its just to much power...... With how bad the the regular GT500 is able to grip, you would think that this would be the NUMBER ONE issue when building the supersnake !!!

    Instead its......."HEY Lets throw a Whipple on it"........"GET ER DONE" !!!!

    750hp means ABSOLUTLY nothing when it cant get put to the ground, cars still badass....but a big thumbs DOWN for doing nothing about traction !!!
  14. walter Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 13, 1998
    Message Count:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    I never thought I'd say this but I have to agree with the chevy guy here. By far the best mods you can do to a Mustang are those that address the Fred Flintstone designed suspension/braking system. I can tell you from personal experience that having a car whose suspension overpowers the tires is way better then having one whose power levels do and nothing else.
  15. Fast05 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Having owned an 05 which had horrible traction issues and grip issues I know what suspension mods can do for a car because I did a lot to make that car put the power where it counted. As far as these particular cars in the video...how many thousands of dollars were spent on the camaro vs the mustang vs the challenger? I was just pointing out that it seems like they left the tires and suspension alone and just threw on more power, which is, stupid. I'm not trying to argue that in their form, what they were in the video, the Mustang is better. Merely stating that you could probably do about 2 grand in tires and suspension work to even the playing field.
  16. All-Or-Nothing New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Message Count:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I personally would still choose the Super Snake. New tires, some suspension mods and you would have a real beast on your hands. Even if the Camaro somehow grew on me, Hennesseys reputation would keep me away.

    Probably would be better and cheaper to just find out what Hennessey and Shelby used and just build it yourself.
  17. nosmatt Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 14, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why waste the time, and money. If you are that close, go all the way to a real automobile.

    458 Italia

    [IMG]
  18. walter Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 13, 1998
    Message Count:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    +1 I agree with you completely, take a watts link for example it isn't that expensive I got mine for 600 bucks and it made a huge different in the feel of the car. It does seem ridiculous to spend an ungodly amount of money on go fast bits and disregarding the rest of the car. I can't tell you how many times I've seen that when I worked at a performance shop, people with more money then sense dump thousands on things like forced induction, engine swaps etc. but forget all about putting the power down efficiently and safely.
  19. SS02 New Member

    Member Since:
    May 30, 2009
    Message Count:
    427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :drool:

    I agree
  20. Fast05 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    +2

    What's the asking price?? :rolleyes: lol

Share This Page