When Obama signs the Climate Change Treaty in Denmark next month, he is signing an agreement to subvert American sovereignty permanently. Of course, the US government senate will have to ratify the treaty for it to have the force of law, officially, but unofficially the executive branch will implement the treaty regardless of senate approval. As I've said many times, in this forum, the Anthropogenic Global Warming Hoax is nothing more than a ploy by progressives and other sociofascists around the world, as a method of achieving their goals, totalitarian control of everyone and every activity of human kind. So, unless your state is willing to engage in Interposition, Nullification, or Secession your lives will be irrevocably affected for the worse, much worse. Climate Change Treaty a Precursor to Global Government?
Yeah.... Thailand doesn't really care nor listen to the rest of the world. An example would be the copying of HIV meds and turning it into a generic form despite being told not to.
It won't happen. He won't sign it. Some will be crushed. Those that understand sovereignty and our constitution will be elated.
Meh, if you hate the NWO so much why do you support the FED and continue to use un-backed paper currency??
-Wednesday, October 14th, 2009 in a speech in St. Paul, Minn. PolitFact checked this statement out, and then gave him a "Pants on Fire" rating. PolitiFact | British climate-change skeptic says Copenhagen treaty threatens "democracy," "freedom" Let me guess though, they are part of the NWO and everything is going according to plan.
Most people have no idea what the FED works. I tried explaining to a friend how it's better for the government to just take more money away from you (via higher taxes) then printing it like they currently do. I want my gold standard back.
Or they could lower taxes, cut bull**** federal spending, and return power to the states. I can't understand how people can support the government and pretend they are using logic and reason to do so. Read 1984, if you have read it, read it again. While you're at it read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Get it while its hot, b/c pretty soon they will be meaningless shreds of paper. And "righties": I am not just against Obama and his cronies, everyone in Washington and politics should be thrown out and revamped with the power to the PEOPLE, not the people in office or the organizations they are in debt to. This definitely goes both ways and republicans are just as greedy and corrupt as the other side.
In NJ, we refer to it as G.R.I.P. Get Rid of Incumbent Politicians. Unfortunately, it usually doesn't go anywhere. http://www.johnatuttle.com/grip.html
Umm, I really don't see how any of that relates to what I said. To make it simpler: The FED needs to be shut down and we need to go back to a gold standard.
You said it was better for them to pull money from the system via higher taxes, problem being they will only print more while continuing to tax a larger percentage on our worthless currency
If I was given the choice between having more money taken out of my pay check each week, or having the government print more, then I would pick having them take more out. When they print more money, it not only devalues my money, but it also devalues the standing of our money in the world economy. So, in a sense, by printing more money they are taking money away from you, myself, and from the rest of the world. For example, if you felt that we should of gone to war in Iraq, then you would need to pick between being taxed more, or having the FED print more (which is what they did). I'd choose the former.
You're missing the point that they do both regardless. Our rape as a society by our government is just getting worse, they increase taxes so we bring home less money and they print more to fund purposeless programs which makes the money we bring home worth even less. I don't feel we should have gone to war in Iraq as a matter of fact.
