Does a V8 mean you have to run 93 Octane

Discussion in 'Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech' started by WICKED50LTR, May 24, 2004.

  1. WICKED50LTR Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Message Count:
    260
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Central NJ
    Ive always wondered. Does having a V8 doesnt matter what size displacement, always have to run on 93 octane?? Ive heard recently must stang V8 guys running on 87 octane and actually getting better gas mileage, and having no problems? is it true? Ive always run 93 in all my stangs and V8 cars, what do you guys run on your cars???????? :shrug:
  2. mustangrfast88 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Message Count:
    333
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    middletown ohio
    well no you dont have to run 93 in a v8 i got a 78 f150 and i run 87 inless i am going to go play in the mud or pulling something, my dad has a 2003 f150 and he runs 87 in it all the time with no problems, the only reason you need to run a 93 or higher is if racing or if running a high compression engine or if you like to pay 2.10 plus for the good stuff


    Sponsored Ad

  3. 88stangmangt New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Message Count:
    2,347
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Stafford,VA
    if your engine isnt set up for it it wont do you anygood. might actually hurt you more in the end.
  4. MumftsGT New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Message Count:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Wichita, KS
    No, it doesn't have anything to do with number of cylinders or engine size. It has more to do with compression ratio and/or tuning/timing.
  5. Mustang5L5 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 19, 2001
    Message Count:
    19,644
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    You make more power with lower octane. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just imagining it.

    Higher octane is used to control detonation when used in boosted and high compression applications.

    Unless you set your 5.0 up for it, you will make more power with 87 octane
  6. ECU5.0 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    raleigh, nc
    what about if your running advanced timing. ive always heard you have to run 93 if you have your timing turned up. when i had it at base timing i ran 87 in it...but since i turned it up to 12* or 13* (buddy did it for me, dont know what its at really) ive been running 93. any insight to this?
  7. HISSIN50 "How long do you think it'll take me to get any he

    Member Since:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Message Count:
    30,855
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    78
    that is what others have said (more octane for more timing). you dont necessarily need higher octane (which equals slower burn). i run as much timing as i can on 87 octane (15* in winter, 12 in summer at over 100* ambient temps). if i ran more octane, i could likely bump a degree or two more. you gotta play with it. you can always back your timing down too (instead of buying higher octane gas).
  8. ECU5.0 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    raleigh, nc
    yeah, im kinda thinkin im gonna do that the way gas is lookin right now. but im gonna try running like 89 or maybe 87 and see how that does
  9. mackey New Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,451
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Beverly, Massachusetts
    There was a whole debate on this before. I do not remember the exact details but all i remember is that running higher octane causes your fuel to last longer in the combustion chamber. AKA burn slower. This way your engine will not experience a lean condition. I have been running 8* timing with 87 octane until today. Car ran great. 200+ miles to the tank and was incredibly reliable. *car is almost stock*
  10. Michael Yount New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 10, 2002
    Message Count:
    9,045
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    There's not a one size fits all when it comes to knowing what combination of timing, compression can be run with what octane fuel. MANY, MANY variables are involved - combustion chamber design, use of the vehicle, ambient weather conditions, age/condition of the engine, head material, cooling system condition -- the list goes on and on.

    There's no benefit to running any higher octane than you have to in order to support your set of variables. Most stock-headed 5.0's can get by with 12-14 degree timing and still run 87 without detonation. But if yours won't either up the octane, or cut back on the timing. What someone else's does may or may not be duplicated by yours. I have aluminum heads on mine - stock bottom end and mild cam; it runs with 16 initial timing, 32 degrees total in by 2800 rpm, and it runs on 87 octane without a hint of detonation. And, it seems to get about 1 mpg better mileage (city and highway) on 87 than on 93. Probably because the 87 octane fuel is ignited more easily and burns a bit more quickly than the 93. For cars with lots of timing and/or compression, the benefits of running the higher octane to avoid detonation outweigh the slower burning characteristics of the fuel.
  11. iwashmycar New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,366
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Yep...87 works fine and is cheaper. :rolleyes: I get 300 miles/tank on my stock setup here.
  12. CManT1914 New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,206
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Killeen, Texas
    Man this sucks, my car with stock timing has slight detonation with mid-grade. I HAVE to put 93 in it to avoid detonation. I tried bumping the timing one day, holy crap, just about didn't get around the block.

Share This Page