Fixed a Factory Fowl up today. Read this.

Discussion in '2005 - 2009 Specific Tech' started by 351wcoupe, Aug 12, 2005.

  1. 351wcoupe New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,845
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Manhattan, Kansas
    I work at a dealership and my partner got a customer who had an 05 Gt with 400 miles and a serious vibration when lugged down at 6-7 mph. It was bad enough the car would shake vilently.

    I was close so I rode with him most of the time trying to track the source. Definately a drivetrain vibration but that was the only thing we were certain of. He had the trans out for a new clutch, driveshaft, and I pulled the diff. cover to check the rear...which was perfect to specs. Still a serious vibration persisted.
    We used a Vibration frequency reader and couldn't get any dead set readings.

    Those who haven't looked under an 05, they use a very unique driveshaft compared to any previous mustangs. It has 1 u-joint, 2 CV's, and a carrier bearing.

    He talked to an engineer who didn't have much to offer either. Until he requested to know the color of marker drawn on the transmission cross-member. It turns out the wrong crossmember was installed and installed upside down as well. We stuck the new crossmember on and its a very smooth ride.
  2. bigcat start with the upper hole, and if more traction is

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2005
    Message Count:
    4,250
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    7200 feet
    that sucks it took so long to pinpoint, but congrats on the accomplishment!! i hate it when you try to pipnpoint a noise or something and cant figure it out, then turns out to be a simple fix....
  3. ctbaker New Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    California
    Based on the title, I assumed this was going to be a story about a bird.. spell checkers people!! :p
  4. svtash New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Message Count:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vista, CA
  5. delurker New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Spell check would have let it go, since fowl is a real word.

    Bad spellers of the world, untie!
  6. 351wcoupe New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,845
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Manhattan, Kansas
    plese don't pic on the fast typers wit dirty handes. itstoo hard two type with greasy fangers.
  7. stanmckinney Active Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,180
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    That's foul.
  8. eric n Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 14, 2001
    Message Count:
    880
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Bakersfield, CA
    since fowl is in fact a correctly spelled word, though not the word actually intended, I fail to see how spell checker would be a benefit.
  9. delurker New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Isn't that what I said?

Share This Page