Hmm.. 5.0 to 2.3 turbo?

Discussion in '2.3L Mustang Talk' started by dead, Oct 19, 2005.

  1. dead New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 3, 2003
    Message Count:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Mississauga, Ontario
    Hey guys, this is my first time venturing into this forum and I've been reading a bit around here. This has probably been brought up before.. I doubt the swap is difficult, but I'm curious if it's recommended.

    The motor in my '91 isn't doing so hot, and I was going to replace it with another in the spring. I can get a 5L motor, complete with probably fairly high mileage 160k km's or so for around 500 CDN. But from the same place I can probably get a decent 2.3 turbo as well.

    The car's being built up for road racing, I'm still in the process of buying all my suspension parts and I'm redoing the brakes over the winter. Any opinions on this project? It seems that if I can make as much or more power than a stock 5L (since I wasn't going to do too much work to the 5.0) and have a lot less weight in the front, that would be ideal for road racing.
  2. Stinger Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Message Count:
    7,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Wilson, KS
    Well, you could pretty easily make the same or more hp as a stock 5.0. The things you need to consider is if the precautions you need to take to keep the engine alive under sustained boost and such (better cooling system, etc.) is worth the 100 or so pounds you will save...
  3. dead New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 3, 2003
    Message Count:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Mississauga, Ontario
    Is that pretty spot on with the weight difference? I thought it would've been more. I've heard the 351 is roughly 80 lbs more than a 5L, I figured the 2.3 would be a good bit lighter.
  4. evintho Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Message Count:
    281
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Santa Rosa, CA.
    A 2.3 longblock (head included) is in the neighborhood of 250-275 lbs.
  5. lamrith Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 7, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    Yeah I don't have specifics, but I think the 2.3 is more like 200-300lbs lighter... evintho's numbers seems to support that as a complete 5.0L is in the 565lb range (with water pump alt etc)
  6. mr_woodster Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Riverside, CA
    Then add in the turbo + manifold, piping etc. It adds up. Now if you put a tubular header on it , a fairly moderate turbo, and aluminum head and a tubular k memeber/controll arms... Sure we are talking ALOT lighter ;)
  7. lamrith Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 7, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    So lets say we add 100# for intake, turbo, manifold, water pump etc.. That is ALLOT of weight and we would still be in the 375# range, 200# lighter than a 5.0 basic motor...
  8. Stinger Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Message Count:
    7,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Wilson, KS
    They are about 100-125lbs lighter...in stock form.
  9. lamrith Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 7, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    Wow, I just find that suprising... With the big mass of the V8, I would have thought the difference to be bigger. :-/

    Is that iron head for both?

Share This Page