How much harder is a 94-95 to work on than a Fox Body?

Discussion in '94-95 Talk' started by Speeds8erM-1, Apr 30, 2005.

  1. Speeds8erM-1 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 6, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Pensacola Florida
    Yep but it's heavier. Besides, a fox body is plenty stiff after sfc's and a cage. :) Im kind of pissed. The yellow 94 GT I was looking at, appears to be sold. :(
  2. Slow5.0 New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    2,561
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    But 94-95 doesn't looks like box and still have 5.0 :D
  3. SN95StangMan New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Lynwood, CA
    :spot:
  4. Speeds8erM-1 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 6, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Pensacola Florida
    There is no arguing with the look of a fox body. I like box cars, thank you very much. :) The yellow 94 GT I thought they sold, they didnt. So who knows.
  5. sociopath5.0 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Message Count:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    somewhere near Louisville, KY
  6. Speeds8erM-1 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 6, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Pensacola Florida
  7. sociopath5.0 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Message Count:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    somewhere near Louisville, KY
    No problem. I seem to be in a smartass mood most of the time. I would recommend a 94-95, they are not difficult at all really. Most any car has its own quirks and things that are more or less difficult than another car. These are cake compared to the F bodies as you well know, and so many parts are out there for them they are fairly cheap to mod. The only thing cheaper would be an older SBC, but we dont talk like that in here. :D
  8. Speeds8erM-1 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 6, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Pensacola Florida
    Cake compared to F-Bodys isnt even the word! :)
  9. Slow5.0 New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    2,561
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Let me get this straight, F-bodys are GM cars , FOX body are 79-93 Mustangs

    One more thing, leave 93 MUstang GT and 94 Mustang GT out side for one full year without paint and find out which one will be rustier :rolleyes:
  10. Speeds8erM-1 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 6, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Pensacola Florida
    Ummm, yep, we are talking about F-Bodys and fox bodys here. F-Body = horrible

    If you leave a fox body and a 94-95 outside with no paint, they will rust the same! Unless there is something magic on the metal that keeps a 94-95 from rusting without paint.

    Oh and I live in Florida, so go fish.
  11. Slow5.0 New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    2,561
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    How much you wanna bet that fox will be 70% more rustier than 94-95
  12. Speeds8erM-1 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 6, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Pensacola Florida
    You havent been around the paint and body industry at all have you? If neither has paint or primer, they are both gonna rust the same. They are made out of the same stuff for the most part and this is Florida, so no snow here.

    Now if you are willing to buy a fox body, a 94-95 and sand them down, then leave both outside, feel free to post your results in 2006. :)
  13. Slow5.0 New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    2,561
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Dang it, i was thinkin i didn't have to reply again but just for the record, here in Erie ,PA is tons of 94-98 Stangs and even more Fox body Mustangs, and i didn't see non of 94-98 that are rusted like Fox body even 93 Fox (because its last year and 94 is close to 93)

    Both 87-93 and 94-95 5.0 are easy to mod but in mine opinion 94-95 Looks better and thats why i drive one
  14. DFG 5OH New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,349
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky
    from my experience, fox's might have a LITTLE more engine bay room, than 94+'s but nothing to brag about.
  15. Sleepy McNastee New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 6, 2004
    Message Count:
    499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Lawrence, KS
    My neighbors have a supercharged fox-body and a turbocharged fox-body .They have a little more room compared to my 95. Its not much like others said, but I am guessing that extra room makes routine maintenance a little easier.


    :OT: Hey Speeds8erM-1, did you see that Tito Ortiz was on Jimmy Kimmel tonight? Pretty cool to see .
  16. Speeds8erM-1 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 6, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Pensacola Florida
    I missed it. :( He is supposed to be trying to start a new MMA organization in the US, we shall see. :)

Share This Page