Engine How To Determine Cfm Requierment Carburator

Discussion in 'Classic Mustang Specific Tech' started by mhjo, Dec 12, 2013.

  1. mhjo

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2000
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    I have a upgraded stock 289, Roller cam, roller lifters, dual plane intake, k/N filter, dual exhaust, Edelbrock heads, HiPo manifolds.

    I now have a Edelbrock 500 cfm carburator, but my mechanic says I'm loosing some HP because I need larger carburator. He suggest Holley 570.

    Any suggestions??
     
    #1
  2. iskwezm

    iskwezm Advanced Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Messages:
    4,157
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    69
    Location:
    Rowland Heights,California
    #2
  3. woodsnake

    woodsnake Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,325
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    39
    Location:
    Hicksville, NY
    How much cam did you use? What rear end gear are you using? What diameter of exhaust pipe? Why only hipo manifolds, and not headers? where are you driving the car? Around town, or on a road course or 1/4 mile strip?
     
    #3
  4. mhjo

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2000
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    #4
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2013
  5. madspeed

    madspeed Colonel Mustard
    Mod Dude Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 1999
    Messages:
    8,742
    Showcase:
    9
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    1,292
    Trophy Points:
    174
    Location:
    a van down by the river
    650 and be done
     
    #5
  6. mhjo

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2000
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    650??? Isn't that too much? The selector that Iskwezm posted suggests 570
     
    #6
  7. 2+2GT

    2+2GT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2009
    Messages:
    3,333
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    59
    Location:
    Southeastern Pennsylvania
    It doesn't need to be that precise. Besides, the stock 289HP carb was a little short of 600, and you've got a lot more cam than that. 600, or 650, would be just fine.
     
    #7
  8. mhjo

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2000
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    How do one calculate the correct CFM (not using online calculators). Can someone enlighten me on the CFM thing?
     
    #8
  9. woodsnake

    woodsnake Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,325
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    39
    Location:
    Hicksville, NY
    The problem with the online calculators is that none of them account for camshaft lift or duration, or cross section of intake manifold, different from stock valves, or lots of other factors that affect engine performance. Don't forget jet sizing too. A smaller carb will typically get better low end performance, and a larger CFM carb, will usually be better on the top end. The 65 Shelby with a 289, got a 715 CFM carb, and my 69 Cougar with 351W got a 470 CFM (4V) from the factory.
    So, I can't give you a specific mathematical equation to answer your question.
    There may be something here that will answer your question:

    http://www.carbdford.com/forum/index.php

    I would just go with the 650. I prefer the Holley's, but I have Edelbrock as well. If your car is an automatic, I would stick with a vacuum secondary.....
     
    #9
  10. mhjo

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2000
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    Thanks. That's what I thought too about the calculators..
     
    #10

Share This Page