how to get power out of my 2.3 non turbo

Discussion in '2.3L Mustang Talk' started by 93mustang0125, Jan 11, 2006.

  1. 93mustang0125 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i have a 1993 mustang 5 spd original at car i have a cold air intake and dual exhaust. Does anyone kno anything else not real exspensive that i can do to it but i will spend some money for it. please help
  2. Stinger Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Message Count:
    7,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Wilson, KS
    There really aren't any cheap, easy, mods for the non-turbo engines. You can do all the "normal" mods and the car will still be slower than most things on the road.
  3. breon New Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 7, 2006
    Message Count:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  4. laytondavenport New Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Message Count:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Try Esslinger

    I'd go to either Racer Walsh or Esslingers website. It will give youideas on whats avaible and then you can makea more informed desicion on how to spend your money more wisely. If it was me I'd do the head.
  5. RustBucket New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Message Count:
    585
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buford, GA
    A head swap may be out of the question here. His '93 is a dual plug motor. Not only is it blessed with one of the worst flowing 2.3 heads ever cast, it's also stuck with it unless the intake halves are changed for earlier pieces and the ignition is modified to work with half the plugs. It can be done but I wouldn't call it a cheap mod.

    You say you're running dual exhaust on your car. Are you still running the stock cast iron exhaust manifold? You can free up a little power by sourcing a tubular manifold from a late model Ranger. Bolts right up with a little bit of modification needed to accomodate the EGR (some welding may be required on the tubing).

    You can play a little with nitrous, but I wouldn't get carried away. Without the ability to easily adjust ignition timing, and cast pistons, detonation and the carnage that goes with it is just a wrong pill away.

    Take a look at aftermarket camshafts. Your setup is hydraulic roller, and there's quite a few replacement cams that offer a performance improvement. This is another decent but not cheap mod.

    If you don't expect much, you won't be dissapointed. There's decent power being made without a turbo, but not in anything I'd call a street car.
  6. RustBucket New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Message Count:
    585
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buford, GA
    We now interrupt for a brief hijack.

    Hey Stinger,

    Have you seen the new Crane Cams catalog? There's a new hydraulic roller in there with specs just a little hotter than the stock DP cam. It must have a more agressive lobe profile than the good ol' RR cam because Crane recommends a dual spring for it. I think I'm going to give it a try on the Turbo motor when it gets built.:shrug:


    Okay, I now return you to your regularly scheduled topic. Thanks
  7. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,498
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
    What's the lift & duration?

    I wouldn't be surprised if it's just a copy of the same cam everyone else has (Racer Walsh #1, Motorsport A234, etc).
  8. Keasbey New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 12, 2003
    Message Count:
    928
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Montreal
    You can also remove the air silencer that is in front/under the airbox

    or simply make you a CAI
  9. RustBucket New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Message Count:
    585
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buford, GA
  10. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,498
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
    Doh! For some reason I read your post and was thinking "hydraulic slider" even though you put hydraulic roller.

    That is a copy, actually. Those are the exact same specs the A237 uses, and it's a roller cam...and you can pick those up for $100. I guarantee you that one probably costs close to $300 (that's what RW's #1 roller costs)

    Cool to see that crane makes that many different roller cams for the 2.3 though :nice:
  11. RustBucket New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Message Count:
    585
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buford, GA
    Yup, further investigation finds that it's an A237 retarded 2 degrees.

    I'll post or PM the numbers if folks want em.
  12. lxstang23 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Message Count:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Clayton DE
    yo bro..where u find the cold air intake i bough 1 b4 but it didnt work bc i have a mass air flow sensor so i sold it to my buddy with his 89 2.3 mines a 93 hatch 2.3L I got the kn air filter and the 40 series muffler soon to come is the superchip, and the header.... i need more help on performance so wat u got comin and wat u find out and where did u git the air intake from?... you can check my project stang at www.cardomain.com/id/chickmagnetstang shes not the greastest but she runs like a champ n i love my baby..so yeah jus need more performance thanx bro
  13. t3hmu5749 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think you can do these couple of things from what I have heard talking to 2.3L gurus

    2.3L Ranger roller cam

    2.5L stroker kit

    Port your head

    Ranger headers (port them)

    Cold air intake (they also make ram air I really don't see the difference)

    65MM throttle body ones off the 4.6L V8 out of a Crown Vic (heard may need throttle body spacer)

    2in. exhaust (Port it)

    Flow Master 40 series or if you after just noise get a glasspacks

    A big coil (minute HP but still ever little bit helps)

    Slightly bigger fuel injecters I think a stock 2.3L has 19lb fuel injecters

    Doing all of this you could probly go to 190 and that engine for it's time already had a butt load of torque.
  14. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,498
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
    Um....no?

    Where'd you get this info from?

    First, you can't port a Ranger manifold because it's already a tubular steel header.

    Second, how do you "port" exhaust pipe?

    Third, a throttle body from a 4.6L is not the one that fits relatively easily. You have to use one from a '94-95 5.0L Mustang, or Thunderbird Super Coupe, and you have to make new holes for the bolts in the throttle body and modify the throttle cable attachment.

    Fourth, there's no way in hell that small amount of stuff is gonna get you 190 hp, or even 190 ft-lbs of torque if that's what you were referring to.
  15. RustBucket New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Message Count:
    585
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buford, GA
    And why the 2" exhaust? I think the factory stuff is 2 1/4" isn't it?

    Big coil? Pay attention. It's a 93. It's got a pair of coil packs. The Motorcraft coils are just fine, unless you just gotta blow the money on something red, shiny and embossed with an MSD logo to impress your friends.


    Stock 5.0 injectors are 19 lb/hr. Stock 2.3 injectors are either 12 or 14 lb/hr.
  16. tealtiger93 Member

    Member Since:
    May 5, 2004
    Message Count:
    703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Allentown/Bethlehem, PA
    Stock is a weak 2 inches, we've all gone with 2 1/4 or even 2 1/2 to replace the stock stuff. Save for the turbo guys, they've got 3".
  17. RustBucket New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Message Count:
    585
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buford, GA
    For some reason I was thinking it was a bit larger than 2". Oh well ain't the first time I was wrong about something. :D Thanks for clarifying.

    Either way, recommending it as a performance enhancement is wrong.
  18. Stinger Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Message Count:
    7,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Wilson, KS
    I port all of my exhaust pipes before I ship them...gains an easy 15-20hp by itself.
  19. t3hmu574n9 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hey man I was just telling you what I heard no need to get all pissed about it. NExt time I am misinformed respectfully reinform me and don't be such an ass.
  20. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,498
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
    Yeah, and I asked, where did you get that info from? Because it's completely wrong.

    I don't see anywhere in my post where I was pissed or "an ass." If you took it that way, then boo-hoo.

Share This Page