doug68hoss
Founding Member
if i had a choose between those and crager ss..still would take the crager..the price is not a issue......those you show here are ok..but that is only my opinion
I like the classic Cragars. They are very similar to the bullits and torque thrusts.CornerCarvin67 said:Although... I'd really like to see the classic Cragar die off..... geez that thing is fugly. It should have died back in the late 70's. YUCK!!
Just my opinion... don't get your undies in a bundy!!
DarkoStoj said:anybody know what the backspacing is on the 17x8" 409's? I can't find that anywhere
I have 17X8 TT II's with a 4.75 backspacing. I did a lot of research on that and there used to be a good post on here about it which was lost due to the crash. However if you would like to see pictures of the clearance I'll be glad to take a picture of it. The clearance is like an 1/8-1/4". But hey, clearing is clearing! It doesn't matter if you clear by a foot or by an 1/8 of an inch. The closest point to hitting is the upper A arm, I think 18's would almost fit better but I guess you do have to make room for the tires!DarkoStoj said:anybody know what the backspacing is on the 17x8" 409's? I can't find that anywhere
XXBULLETSXX said:I have 17X8 TT II's with a 4.75 backspacing.
I'm running 225-45-17's but I found out only hours after I bought mine that you can run a 235-45-17. I've also hear that it's possible to run a 245-40-17 but I don't know that to be true.ron67fb said:What tire sizes are you using?
MustangJunkie said:Why isn't the wheel centered in the wheel well?
pic of whole car?Islandboy33 said:Thanks Dark, that's actually my car. I have 4.5 backspace.
BTW the engine is out of the car in this pic thats why there is a huge gap in the wheel well.