93gtmustang
5 Year Member
- Oct 21, 2006
- 409
- 15
- 29
In today's age, 5.0s just aren't competitive... - 12-01-06, 09:26 PM
I think you've started something!!!!!!!!!!
In today's age, 5.0s just aren't competitive... - 12-01-06, 09:26 PM
Heck, nothing under 100k is really competitive with a Z06!
A lot of fun cars aren't competitive with today's Corvettes or whatever, but they are still fun to build -- CRX, fox body, 3rd gen fbody, LT1 fbody, 94-95 GT, 240sx, ae86 Corolla, Grand National, Syclone, turbo Dodges etc. I know a guy that just dumped $30k into a late '70s Datsun 510 -- would it outperform a C6? Probably not, but it's very cool and fun.
Not a contradiction....how many middle class family guys are going out financing 80k dollar cars? The only people driving them are people wealthy enough to afford the 600+ a month just for the car payment, not to mention the insane insurance price. If you can afford all that then you're probably doing well enough to charge the stuff to make a Mustang faster.
Also, how many Z06 owners are taking their cars to banked test tracks? I wasn't saying how long would it last as far as before it blew up, i'm saying how practical is a 190mph top speed when you probably will never get it that fast? Also any Mustang that you can handle driving daily can be make as fast as i'm talking about and still be daily driven....that's the magic of turbos. 1000hp street cars are very common these days, and if you build your suspension with adjustable shocks and struts then it'll handle just as well (or bad) as a typical Mustang. I don't think the Z06 is what i would call a comfortable ride either.
I forget the guys name, but he just hit the 200mph mark racing in the NMRA with a Fox Body.
there is a lot of cars that are faster than the 5.0. But there is no other car out there with the variety or aftermarket/performance parts like the 5.0 has IMO. With all of the manufacturers still coming out with more 5.0 parts than the 4.6's. With our options of performance parts, it makes us proud 5.0 owners capable of taking on anything.
LOL they have gone a tick faster than that, comparing an NMRA drag car to what we are talking about here is asanine at best.
I can build such n such for half the money and not mess wit that tharr fee yoooolll injecshun mumbo jumbo"
The correct spelling is asinine by the way.
And the original post was about how much it would cost to make equal or more horse power in a Fox compared to newer models.
I was stating a fact.
With enough knowledge and money , you can go as fast as you want!
Pro 5.0 class run 6.60 et 212 mph. These cars are similiar to a NHRA Pro Stock Type car with a carbon fiber body and a tube chassis.
.
The car I was speaking off was a Fox Body. I believe the class was Vortech Outlaw 10.5. The 10.5 is the max width of the slicks in this class.
LOL, they haven't gone a tick faster. Your thinking of Pro 5.0. This car was the first stock body type car ( and it was a Fox Body) to hit the 200mph mark.
Since Chevy started coming out with cars from the factory that were faster than well-planned H/C/I 5.0s, and since Fords mustang Cobra could make 500 rwhp with a chip, pulley, exhaust and a tune.
I know that once I twin turboed my '91 mustang, I never looked at a 5.0 as if it were a race. I did, however, look forward to racing '03-'04 cobras, '05+ vettes, etc...
I know there are some blazingly fast 5.0s out there, but guess what: on the street in two years of having a turbo 5.0 that only made around 420rwhp I only ran into one other fox-body that could run with me. They've got a corvette now from the factory that's faster than both of us were, and there are plenty of '03-'04 Cobras that I see around town that would've run with me.
5.0s just aren't competitive today. There's just too much that has to be done to one to put it in the same league as another gear-head's cobra, vette, LSx, hemi etc... They still have a reputation as being capable of being fast if a lot of money is put into them, no doubt. Then again, the same could be said of anything.
Chris