I'm running a set of Canfields on stock height headers. You know nothing.
If you run the wrong cam with the wrong head, it's not going to get good power numbers. A Canfield head is designed to flow at high rpm with a bigger cam. If you run it on smaller cam against an AFR head that is designed for that size cam, then it kind of defeats the purpose. Benchracing out of magazines is a waste of time. Go out and see what people are winning races with. That's a much better indicator.
As far as flow numbers go, Canfield publishes there flow numbers at .500" lift, while just about every other manufacturer publishes at .700" lift. That is where some people are mislead by flow numbers.
Anyway, I realized that I might have recommended a head that is a little on the large side, and I changed my suggestion to the Edelbrock head.
If you run the wrong cam with the wrong head, it's not going to get good power numbers. A Canfield head is designed to flow at high rpm with a bigger cam. If you run it on smaller cam against an AFR head that is designed for that size cam, then it kind of defeats the purpose. Benchracing out of magazines is a waste of time. Go out and see what people are winning races with. That's a much better indicator.
As far as flow numbers go, Canfield publishes there flow numbers at .500" lift, while just about every other manufacturer publishes at .700" lift. That is where some people are mislead by flow numbers.
Anyway, I realized that I might have recommended a head that is a little on the large side, and I changed my suggestion to the Edelbrock head.