K&N FIPK or Roush Performance Cold Air induction Kit

Discussion in 'SN95 4.6L Mustang' started by ccharanza87, May 5, 2005.

  1. ccharanza87 New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Message Count:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm looking to replace the factory air intake and can't decide which one to go with so i figured i'd ask here, since there is a wealth of knowledge on this board. I was originally looking into the K&N FIPK for my 02 GT and have since stumbled upon the Roush Performance Cold air intake kit, i've found plenty of reviews on the K&N but i can't really seem to find much on the Roush kit, i know that Roush is a leader in mustang performance but i wonder if anyone has any experience with the Roush kit, it seems to be a little less expensive, well at least at Summit Racing it does, but i was wondering if there is a difference or if i would probably expect the same performance out of either one.

    Thanks in Advance

    Chris
  2. propellerhead New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,593
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'd go with the Roush mainly for cool factor. Not much info on the Roush website either.
  3. speed545 New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Message Count:
    465
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I ve read in a magazine an article on Roush CAI. They had good comments on it. But i think the roush CAI puts the filter into the fenderwell.
  4. ponygirl74 New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I put a K&N FIPK in my 02 GT. The K&N is supposed to be better performing because it is plastic vs. most others are metal. It is also cheaper than the Roush. But if it is underhood bling you desire, then I would go with the Rousch. I almost wish I had gotten the Steeda CAI merely for the appearance. Here is what my K&N looks like installed. BTW - pls overlook my dirty engine bay, it is much cleaner now

    Attached Files:

  5. Silvr04GT Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Message Count:
    1,134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I was checkin out the Steeda intake, it look like a pretty cool one!
  6. UndeadRogue New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    id stay away from anything that puts the filter in the fender...I have a MAC and I love it...but having the filter in the fender is a freaking pain in the A**...
  7. propellerhead New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,593
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you're worried about temperature, it doesn't make that much of a difference. Maybe 2-4 degrees once you're moving. That's less than half a horsepower!
  8. GDawg Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 22, 2002
    Message Count:
    2,211
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I have no opinion which one to go for but here's a picture of my K&N FIPK Gen2.

    [IMG]

    btw, red text is obnoxious.
  9. UndeadRogue New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    hehe if you had to take off the bumper cover to install a filter you may have an opinion ;)
  10. closer9 New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have the Roush CAI on my 04 GT. I mainly got it, because it was black plastic, put the filter out of sight in the fender, and to the the average Joe it looks stock... I'm not into bling...

    I don't remember what I paid for it now, but I do remember I got a really good deal on it new from ebay...
  11. propellerhead New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,593
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Pics?
  12. 02camarokiller New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Message Count:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have a Roush CAI on my 02. It's in the fender and a pain in the azz to change or clean. It's plastic, not metal. K&N has only 1) 75 degree bend and Roush has 2 bends. The less bends the more performance. However, going into the fender takes away some heat. Take your pick! I'd go with Roush.
  13. closer9 New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'll try to post some when I get home tonight.
  14. StangPro New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Message Count:
    441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The DeMolet and JLT are better options.

    We've only had one customer with the Roush, and it had some fit issues. The k&n is decent and nothing really wrong with it.

    Why is the filter in the fenderwell a big deal?
    Working by themselves the average install time for a tech is 15 minutes to remove and reinstall, and with a helper it can get down to 10.

    That's 5 minutes to pull it or put it on.
  15. Torinalth Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Message Count:
    970
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i agree with StangPro. i have the Demolet fenderwell and it took me about 40 min because i actually read the instruction. had i just gone at it and ignored the directions i would have been done in 20.

    as far as the filter in the fender, i really dont see the issue either. i can pop out the filter in under a minute.... so, i fail to see where the pain is that everyone talks about. Hey Stangpro, didnt you have an article on your site of a comparison of the JLT and the DeMolet? might be a good read for some people.

    Torinalth
  16. StangPro New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Message Count:
    441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  17. BLUE03GT New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    281
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    JLT gets my vote... when it isnt 90+ degrees :nonono: here in Ca... i can definately feel the power in the upper rpms and pulls harder all the way to redline...
  18. turboscrew New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Message Count:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I 2nd on the Demolet. Its a great intake with good gains that you can actually feel. It took me about an hour to install by myself but it took me a little while to take the POS mac straight shot system out.
  19. kstang69 New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2003
    Message Count:
    153
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i vote for the demolet simply b/c i have seen several articles that noted a pretty substantial gain with it. i am going to go with it after i do a few other things.
  20. Silvr04GT Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Message Count:
    1,134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Does anyone know if most of these air intakes will work with a Kenne Bell kit? Or larger TBs?

Share This Page