I'll start off by stating my opinion. I think the dyno is a better means of showing potential of horsepower/torque gained by a mod rather than the track. There are less variables.
With the dyno, parameters are entered into the computer. You do not have to worry about driver skill/track prep/humidity levels as much.
At the track when a mod is performed, how can you possibly shift at the exact rpm or at the exact speed and launch the exact same, or have the exact same track prep to see what you gained with a mod? I think the dyno cancels out a lot of those indescrepancies...what do you guys think?
On a dyno, (with a manual), you stick in 4th gear after it has been strapped down and hit the throttle till a given rpm. You then see a breakdown of the graph and a/f ratio/etc.
Let's here what everyone thinks that shows the potential of the car? Trap speed...
I am bias on this...
With the dyno, parameters are entered into the computer. You do not have to worry about driver skill/track prep/humidity levels as much.
At the track when a mod is performed, how can you possibly shift at the exact rpm or at the exact speed and launch the exact same, or have the exact same track prep to see what you gained with a mod? I think the dyno cancels out a lot of those indescrepancies...what do you guys think?
On a dyno, (with a manual), you stick in 4th gear after it has been strapped down and hit the throttle till a given rpm. You then see a breakdown of the graph and a/f ratio/etc.
Let's here what everyone thinks that shows the potential of the car? Trap speed...
I am bias on this...