More bailouts, GMAC for the third time

Discussion in 'Fight Club' started by sphinx, Oct 29, 2009.

  1. sphinx Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Message Count:
    894
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Tim Geithner, Don't You Dare Bail Out GMAC Again


    If we don't pass the stimulus bill, the economy will collapse.
    If we don't pass the bank bailout bill, the economy will collapse.
    If we don't pass the auto bailout bill, the ecomomy will collapse.
    If we don't pass the finance bailout bill, the economy will collapse.
    If we dont pass the healthcare bill, your grandmother will die.

    Anyone else seeing a pattern?
  2. jikelly Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,344
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    58
    They passed the stimulus bill and the economy didn't collapse.
    They passed the bank bailout bill and the economy didn't collapse
    They passed the auto bailout bill and the economy didn't collapse
    They passed the finance bill and the economy didn't collapse

    See a pattern here?

    Now this last one is different I think you forgot something.

    If they don't pass the healthcare bill, your grandmother will die and you will be bankrupted by increasing medical costs.
  3. Dusstbuster I love meat more than anything! I just have a spec

    Member Since:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Problem with your logic:

    Economy wouldn't have collapsed if the stimulus hadn't been passed...
  4. jikelly Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,344
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Thank God we will never know if you're right.
  5. strtrcr50 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually, we do. Seeing as how very little of the porkulus money was spent. Although, those 30 jobs per state prob made a big difference.:rolleyes:
  6. Dusstbuster I love meat more than anything! I just have a spec

    Member Since:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It's actually pretty obvious that I am right...we've spent nearly nothing, talked all fluff and sprinkles, and the economy for the most part is turning around on its own.

    Like we've discussed before, Obama has just set it up so he can't fail.
  7. jikelly Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,344
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Oh Obama can fail. Many republicans are working on that right now. :rolleyes:

    And you're wrong about the fluff and sprinkles. Why do you think the powers that be started screaming for a bank bailout long before Obama was elected?

    Please read.

    Outrage at Wall Street: After Bailout, Bonuses Rise -- Printout -- TIME
  8. Dusstbuster I love meat more than anything! I just have a spec

    Member Since:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Preventing a major bank meltdown might be one thing, the Stimulus on the other hand is worthless. Government involvement should be minimal at most, not $1+ Trillion. Sorry Kelly, while it might have softened a blow by a small margin, all this Governmental intervention hasn't helped or solved anything drastically.

    Just like you say "prove that it hasn't helped" I say prove that it has...prove that these places NEEDED the money to survive and that this money HAD to be spent to prevent a major meltdown. You can't, and guess what, as history has shown, it doesn't help. The markets recover on their own as they always have and always will. Does there need to be oversight? Yes. Does the Goverment have more than oversight? Yes. Does the Government efficiently oversee things? NO.

    Will any of this change how you feel? No. Will anything you say change how others feel? No.
  9. jikelly Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,344
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    58
    I'll say again that unregulated capitalist markets are unstable.

    We were headed for a major severe depression (probably a world wide depression) without the injection of funds. Sure we would have eventually recovered from bank closers and the loss of the US auto industry, but that would have been a painful loss and a lot of people would be on the street. I'm going to bet it would have resulted in greater government involvement and expenditures than we have now just to keep people from starving.
  10. rbohm Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2002
    Message Count:
    4,699
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    68
    i agree that unregulated capitalism is not a good thing, but then neither is over regulated capitalism. as for the various bailouts, i give credit to the tarp fund for preventing a financial collapse, only because it freed up the credit markets a bit. the other bailouts though and stimulus package are not only unnecessary, but will push the economy into hyperinflation, high interest rates, and generally down further into depression. what should have happened in regards to the auto industry is that the government should never have loaned money to gm and chrysler, and then helped them through bankruptcy, and government/union take over of those companies. these companies should have gone into chapter 11 long before any government money was given to them, and let the chips fall where they may. as it is now we the people are on the hook for $50+ billion that will likely never be repaid.

    the tarp money has already seen some profit.

    in the end our government is spending far too much money right now, and that will only ruin the economy in the long run. i mean when china, france, and germany all tell the US that we have to stop spending money like its free, and when the world is starting to make noises about replacing the US dollar as the world currency standard, you know we are in trouble.

    as for health insurance, the bills in front of congress right now are disasters in the making, and will only drive the cost of health care up. you cant reduce costs by raising taxes on everyone and everything, and you cant recude teh deficit by hiding things, and by using creative accounting. if private business did what the government is doing, not only would that business be bankrupt, but the ceo and others running the business would be in jail on various felony charges.
  11. jikelly Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,344
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Funny that China and them would **** about the US spending money like it's free. Thay had their own bailouts. Germany even did a CFC type deal to get people buying cars.

    China's bailout was massive and apparently effective. Their economy is on its way back.

    They are just wishing we'd let our own industries fail so they can domonate the markets.

    Posted via Mobile Device
  12. Venom351R Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Message Count:
    13,335
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    78
    The direction our economy is going now it will collapse.

    Back in the 70's the government printed a lot of money, it was to much money in the system it caused inflation (inflation usually takes 2 years to take hold after mass spending). Over all there was 13% excess of money in our system so for example if you took out a loan for $100 it would cost you $120 to pay it back and that extra $20 was sent back to the reserve and destroyed to try and pull back the amount of extra money in our system. Back in the 70's the 13% excess amount of money led to a interest rate hike of 20%. Currently in the past year we have spent such a staggering amount of money that we have flooded the system with 120% in excess money. If rates went up by 20% over an influx of 13% to much money what do you think its going to be like w/ an excess amount of 120% currently in our system?

    Can you see whats happening here kelly? We cant keep borrowing money, we cant keep printing money. Its going to cause our dollar to bottom out and or economy to collapse. Iceland had a GDP of 5% in a time frame of only 4 years it all went to hell and now their currency is worthless. It can happen and it will happen if this continues.
  13. rbohm Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2002
    Message Count:
    4,699
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    68
    one thing you fail to take into account is that china is right now a creditor nation, and we are a debtor nation. also china is creating a business friendly environment, and their manufacturing base in increasing, where as ours in decreasing. they have a trade surplus, we have a trade deficit. also china has tons of cash available where as we have essentially none. we are also trying to monetize our debt, which in the end is only going to cause high inflation, and high interest rates. china has lowered taxes, we are raising them.

    in the end china is making the right moves to improve their economy, and we are making all the wrong moves.

Share This Page