Real world mileage with the 2011 V6?

Discussion in '2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech' started by JimTMich, Oct 13, 2010.


  1. JimTMich

    JimTMich Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    EPA says 19 -31.

    So what is everybody really getting and qualify those numbers with how you drive and what type of driving.
    #1
  2. 1wildGT

    1wildGT Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Messages:
    1,098
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My wife gets 25 ave in her v-6 with mixed city/highway (normal driving). When I drive it (highway) I can get 32 - 33 if I cruise at 55 - 60 with A/C on (babying it for max mpg). If I go 70 it drops to about 29 mpg.

    Pretty good for a Mustang.
    #2
  3. AlbertaEthan

    AlbertaEthan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2010
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    8
    The couple times I've taken it out on the highway I'm getting about 8L/100 km (29ish mpg) doing roughly 130km/h (80mph). Going to school (mixed driving) I get about 11L/100km (21mpg) if I'm nice to it hehe :D
    #3
  4. a_guerrajr

    a_guerrajr New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    combined i'm at around 26mpg, still havent hit 1K
    #4
  5. maddog05

    maddog05 New Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    great mpg

    after 2000 mile break in 33 mpg hyghway at 52 mph
    mixed drivlng 27 mpg keeping rev down below 2000
    26 if just mixed and relaxed:)
    #5
  6. Wrxified

    Wrxified New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Did my first trip on the highway this week. I did about 563 miles roundtrip going from Grand Rapids MI to Milwaukee WI. This was a great way to measure realistic mpg on the HWY because you drive through 4 states with speed limits ranging between 55 and 70 mph. Plus there was a little bit of construction and Chicago bumper-to-bumper traffic thrown into the mix. Of the 563 miles about 25 of it was off the expressway traveling between the hotels, restaurants and customer locations. Here are my calculations, mods and information. Also just to clarify, while I believe the car's info commuter is fairly accurate, nothing is quite as accurate as starting with a full tank and then recording miles driven/gallons used at each fill up. This is how I measured it.

    * 3.31 gears
    * 6 spd manual
    * Only modification at the time was my Bama tune (93 octane Performance Tune)
    * 563.7 miles driven, 19.64 gallons of 93 octane used = 28.7 mpg (Car calculated it to 27.4)


    Overall I'm very happy with those numbers.
    #6
  7. echo7

    echo7 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    547
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    19
    Not bad at all for 3.31 gears :)
    #7
  8. willie2323

    willie2323 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    3.31 gears

    Wrxified,
    Do you have the performance package? I am really excited about this package and curious as to others impressions that actually have this package.

    thanx,

    Bill in Phoenix
    #8
  9. Wrxified

    Wrxified New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bill - I do have the performance package and to tell you the truth I'm kind of torn on it so far.

    Here is how I break it down so far.

    • Wheels: Well they're okay. I'm not a huge fan of the style. They remind me of a lot of wheels you would see on the shelf at Discount Tire.
    • 3:31 rear: Love it but I wouldn't be surprised if I swapped it down the road some day for a 3:73.
    • Performance ECU parameters. Haven't done any real world testing at the track to have an opinion one way or another. I think a lot of people assume you get some cool setting that makes the car quicker off the line. I don't think that is what it's doing. My understanding is that it just lets you push it further before the stability control interferes.
    • Supsension: Not worth it in my opinion. I'll be replacing the shocks/springs eventually. I hate the lifted look.
    • Brakes: Love them. What's not to love? They stop on a dime.

    Like anything it's going to come down to a person's opinion. If you like the style of wheel, never want more than a 3:31 rear, and don't think the car has a lifted sort of look then the performance package is an awesome deal. I personally would have jumped in a heartbeat to have the $1700 or so Brembo upgrade that GT owners have. I love the style of wheel, drool over the Brembo brakes and could add the 3:31 rear separate then if I wanted.
    #9
  10. willie2323

    willie2323 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    thanx for that info, very nice objective opinions. yea on the lifted look, way to high in the rear.
    hmmm, performance ECU parameters? I didnt know that was part of the package.

    bill
    #10

Share This Page