I wouldn't know about all that but honestly, the things Steve did to that 95 would be no more of a challenge to tune than the typical blown combo owned by members on this site.
I just don't see where there would be a difference between his Saleen and our 94-95 cars
I wouldn't know about all that but honestly, the things Steve did to that 95 would be no more of a challenge to tune than the typical blown combo owned by members on this site.
I just don't see where there would be a difference between his Saleen and our 94-95 cars
as long as you make sure your flux capacitor is grounded properly.
I really do not know why someone would use a bronco/E series van computer? If it was for a 351...ford had a mustang eec to run that in the 94-95 in the R (ZAO) processor. I also think the 351 eecs out of those year trucks would have had an E4od and not the AOD (IIRC E4od was std. after 92 ) making more headaches than solutions. I would also think the truck batch fire vs. sequential in the mustangs and truck tune would be no better of a base/starting point.
Saleen could have tuned the stock eec since he had ford engineers to fall back on. I would not be supprised if he used the stock eec and ran an FMU as that was std. practice back in the early-mid 90's.