For the last 6 months. Guess I might as well throw my gloves down now that I'm back. Got this is an email, and it seems to pretty much sum things up. Sorry if its a repost. I thoroughly hope this reaches as many undecided voters as possible, before it is too late. Any logical person would not be able to consider voting for Satan to lead the greatest country in the world. This wave of "Change" may sound catchy, however change will not happen during an Obama presidency. If elected, the next president will face a couple of years of continuing turmoil and fallout from the current economical crisis and then ride out a wave of good fortune for the entire presidency. This good fortune will be the result of mandatory bail-outs and repairs to the economy and lending institutions which are being introduced during the current administration. As the sitting democratic congress, democratic senate and the chairman of the federal reserve have stated, it will take time for the effects of any stimulus package or bailout to be noticed. Likewise: The aftermath of the "Change" indoctrination will take 8-10 years before the effects will be felt and will occur during the next presidency after Obama-bin-changer, let me just provide some facts to back this observation. 1) Demo-criminals blamed George W. Bush for the Mortgage Crisis with assistance from the vast Media Regime. However, this article makes for a good read: Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending - New York Times It's hard to rewrite documented historical facts, unless you: dodged the draft, were born in a different country and are running for president on an empty promise of "Change". Oh ya!, and the Media is in your back pocket. I ask you now... Who is directly responsible for the Mortgage Crisis? If having it spelled out for you is not successful, then please stop reading, go back to your ignorant wellfare collection scheme and continue your miserable existence. I'm sure you can complain all day and night when you do nothing to make your situation different. 2) The war in Iraq & Afghanistan are who's fault? Bush I assume? Hmmm, I doubt anyone has forgotten a particular date, though if a reminder is necessary for the ignorant, I'll give you a subtle hint: 911. The shortlived out-pouring of "Resolve" was reminiscent of the time surrounding D-day, though with no follow-through. Everyone at the time of WWII came together and physically joined in the war effort and they didn't stop until the threat was erradicated. There was no question of "unjust occupation", we were neutralizing adversaries on numerous fronts and on several continents. Of coarse war is unpopular when people's relatives and friends are lost. We cannot stomp on these uniformed men's honor by not viewing them as anything less than heroes. Furthermore, we must sacrifice anything necessary in our homeland to ensure that they are provided with the very tools to complete their mission. These proud men & women volunteered to represent our great land in the global theater, recognizing that the ultimate price could be sacrificed. How dare any person keep a "tally" of the dead in order to use it to call our armed forces "failures". Thank you to our brave Men, Women and families for your ultimate sacrifice. May your honor shine like the brightest star and may you be recognized forever for your valor. Just a couple of links to show how Bubba-draft-dodger handled things: September 11: Bill Clinton’s Ultimate Legacy http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/felon.asp 3) Taxes without representation: Isn't this why we started our war of Independence? You may argue that Obama-bam-a-rama won't increase taxes on the poor and will take from the rich by increasing their taxes, and you justify voting for this empty cereal box because he says he won't. Just for a moment, I would like everyone to logically think of this as a long-term plan. No one economist can agree that raising taxes on anyone is going to spur economic independence and growth. You want a socialistic society move to europe or china. We need to get the governments hand out of our back pocket. I think it's ridiculous that when an average working man/woman get's paid for their work the government takes around 30% and we allow it, and even worse, we are used to it. Death tax, taxing social security, double taxation, luxury tax, on and on and on. We need a fair balanced tax code, though we need to create it responsibly and over time with a plan. Remember though that the effects of responsible spending, balanced budgets and reducing tax insults on our population will take time. McCain may not have his plan completely ironed out just yet, however the "change" agent has only proposed tax increases and more government programs. For what? So he can permanently flush our nations wealth down his Kenyan Granny's toilet? What's this genius' motives? World instability? The destruction of Isreal? Free healthcare for the poor paid for by the people who are paying way too much in taxes? Ask yourself these questions? 4) Qualifications? Who is qualified? A long-term U.S. Senator, war hero, writer of legislation and known radical in his own party might really be an agent for "change". Or do we trust a muslim, racist, 2-year term senator with a devlish tongue, smooth empty answers, with no knowledge on the economy or the military, who's friends consist of convicts, terrorists, known racists, Palestinian Liberation Organization Spokespersons, and the criminal news media? Get a ****ing grip america! Is it so popular to self loathe that we would even consider this guy? He's like a sneaky car salesman, who get's your address and sneaks in at night and pulls the sheets right out from under you while you sleep and leaves his business card on the dresser. So what do you do? Do you go down to the dealership and beat the bastards ass... Or do you invite him over for dinner and encourage him to sleep with your daughter? Kick this clown in the pants. He's a bull**** artist at best. He's refused to participate in the federal election matching system that ensures that some circus freak can't accept and spend massive amounts of money to purchase an election. Why would he have to purchase it? Because this loser has no substance, no plan and no balls on foreign aggression and domestic terrorism. There you go Obama supporters/voters/delegates, you've sold your vote to a snake.: Barack Obama on Budget & Economy 5) Killing unborn/partially born children. I don't know about you but, this idea is completely ****ing wrong, un-natural and I'm glad to hear that the occurance of abortion is in decline. You can use the arguement that in the case of rape or incest, well that's fine, although those cases hardly make-up 1% of the circumstances for abortion. Maybe we should not kill millions of children to justify the cases of a few or at least require some type of court action before it can be justified and definitely the public should not be paying for these procedures under any circumstance. If they have enough supporters to create a foundation to pay for the procedures, then great. Private funds are not a matter of public opinion. Killing unborn/partially born children is a huge act of terrorism to the only true innocence left in the world, have fun burning in hell, don't make me a part of it! Abortion Statistics Barack Obama on Abortion Soooooo! Wake up america! pass this on to as many people as you can. We need to stand for something and quit getting kicked in the teeth by the socialist elite! Stand together and ignore the polls! Get your ass out and vote, it'll make this dip**** cry like a whiney little ****.
Therian, we were discussing this over in "Redistribution" and you left me high and dry to go to Karate.
****! totally forgot man... I got too busy with Dew's post and then I got side tracked. I will get back to you
What loser sent this to you? Citing 1999 to explain what's happened in the last 9 years? What a Moron!! I guess the twit also missed the memo that Iraq was not involved in 911. Taxation without representation? Doesn't this twit understand thats where we are now? I mean, unless your in the top 1% of wage earners, then your WELL represented. Qualifications? Dubya has shown the president doesn't need 'qualifications' or even be smart, and he was a governor of an oil state. Plus I guess whoever sent you this hasn't yet realized McCains cogs are slipping. But then the anonymous mailer of your post missed the 911-Iraq memo so I don't hold out much hope on their getting a clue any time soon. Oh Yeah, then the mailer of this message makes the Partial Birth Maneuver .... Thanks for forwarding this, I needed a laugh.
Hey, no problem, I was actually hoping for someone to take a poke at this. Now are you sure that it wasn't Clinton that drove the final nail in the coffin when he repealed the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act and the 1956 Bank Holding Company Act? Google "Community Redevelopment Act" or "Graham Leech Bliley Act" and then come back and talk to me. While you're at it look at what Jimmy did back in 79' I don't believe he said they were involoved in 911. He said that 911 is what got the people behind doing something about Iraq, who should have techically been dealt with during the Clinton era for U.N. treaty voliations.
No problem. Its the same old crap. Its sad people still write it and sadder people fall for it. So, really, who sent it to you?
